Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Free will, determinism and the criminal justice system

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  

What is your position on the issue of free will?
Hard Determinist
12%
 12%  [ 1 ]
Compatibilist
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Metaphysical Libertarian
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Hard Indeterminist
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Who cares?
87%
 87%  [ 7 ]
Total Votes : 8

Author Message
Nick - Pie Man 



Joined: 04 Aug 2010


PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

It used to be interesting. It doesn't matter any more since I feel like I have free will, and that's good enough for me.

(Mind you I dont like to think about what's happening when I get drunk. Mind bending stuff)
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:39 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

OMFG bring on pre season!!

where are the saints when you need em??

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:53 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

think positive wrote:
OMFG bring on pre season!!

where are the saints when you need em??

Well, at least one of them is - as it happens - in the (cough, cough) criminal justice system. Laughing
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:05 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
think positive wrote:
OMFG bring on pre season!!

where are the saints when you need em??

Well, at least one of them is - as it happens - in the (cough, cough) criminal justice system. Laughing


Twisted Evil Twisted Evil allalulya to that!! Twisted Evil Twisted Evil

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:56 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:



Yep, but that's exactly what socialisation is.


So you are a socialist after all despite your constant denials.

You really do like socialist alternative group think.

Let's see your blue singlet comerade!!

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae-YxX71pyE
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 6:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
Lol, ok. Do you mean something spontaneous, or pre-planned? And is there really such thing as 'out of character'? Doesn't that just mean 'slightly unusual'?

Lets say I walk home the same way every night, but then one day decided to go a different direction. Is that an example of free will, or is it just symptomatic of a quality I have of liking to occasionally break routine? Or were you thinking of something else?

I wager that you can give me any example of human behaviour and I can give a possible explanation of why it was done and why it was the only thing that could have been done in those circumstances. I think. Mr. Green

(Of course, it's better if you come up with an example, otherwise it looks like I'm cheating... Razz)


LOL, back to the rescue.

Something spontaneous or planned, doing something you wouldn't normally do for no real reason other than you can.

I did that a bit when I was living alone for a few years and taught myself to be spontaneous if that makes sense.

I don't know about you, but I might be sitting home alone on a Friday night and have the whim of a thought, "why not go out?" usually I argue with myself providing reasons why not to do it until it's too late and the whim gives up.

On a few occasions, I've just gone **** it, no arguments tonight, got in the shower then called a taxi.

Another example.

I don't eat fish. Don't like the taste. When I last went to Port Douglas for a holiday I decided to eat fish. Well, Prawns. I decided to try foods I had never eaten before. Some I liked.

I suppose my point is, you can over ride instinct, judgement and routine and choose to do things way out of your comfort zone if you decide to.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:48 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Stui. Wink

If we were capable of truly spontaneous decisions, perhaps that'd be evidence of something (probably indeterminism, true randomness), but I don't think we're capable of genuine spontaneity. If I, say, impulsively do a handstand while serving a customer, even if I've barely thought about it for more than a split-second, I've really 'thought' enough for my brain to send signals to my arms and body to commence the act. This kind of spontaneity is just a quicker action than usual, but the same process as usual has occurred.

Anyway, even if we were capable of real spontaneity (and perhaps there are certain conditions like tourettes where that's the case), that hardly helps an argument for free will!

I guess the fact that we can do something 'out of character' means that, as you say, we're not bound merely to routine or convention. But I don't think that proves free will or disproves determinism; after all, if we were bound by these things, an intelligent person would be able to quite easily predict what most people would do with their lives. Determinism doesn't assert that; it simply argues that, predictable to a normal person or otherwise, everything that happens is inevitable.

Imagine for a second that you could record your brain activity during the time you decided to go out on a Friday night on a whim. Slow that process down so you can see every little step in the process between sitting on the couch and getting up, and you'd see something like this:

1) You're sitting on the couch, not sure about whether or not you'll leave the house tonight.
2) Your brain assesses various reasons why going out is a good idea (good memories, hope of having fun, not wanting to stay home, etc.). This gives you motive.
3) Your brain assesses all the data relevant to the situation (will I have a good time? Do I have a way of getting home? Do I feel tired right now?) and calculates best answer. You may not even be consciously aware of this process, but within a few microseconds you've made a decision.
4) Decision is made, so your brain sends signals down to the relevant nerves and muscles to prompt movement, and you get up from the couch. Action.

If you believe in free will, I guess you've got to point to a certain part of that process in which a free decision is being made. Most people would say step 3). The trouble is that in step 3 your brain is simply calculating an answer based on all the data available to it. It's like a computer which has been programmed with the objective: what is the best thing for Stui? You could hypothetically construct a computer and feed it all the variables to perform the same process and come up with the same answer, but you wouldn't say the computer has free will, right?

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Nick - Pie Man 



Joined: 04 Aug 2010


PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

You could extend that logic and argue that if we know all the exact physical data of every particle in the universe, it would by possible to build a computer program that can look into the past and future with 100% accuracy. No free will there.

Unfortuantely reality doesnt work that way.

I wonder what would happen if I did build such a computer. Would it simulate itself simulating itself?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:54 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick - Pie Man wrote:
You could extend that logic and argue that if we know all the exact physical data of every particle in the universe, it would by possible to build a computer program that can look into the past and future with 100% accuracy. No free will there.

Unfortuantely reality doesnt work that way.

I wonder what would happen if I did build such a computer. Would it simulate itself simulating itself?


did u miss a T there??

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:56 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Hurrah! Define free.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Nick - Pie Man 



Joined: 04 Aug 2010


PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Free will, determinism and the criminal justice systemReply with quote

David wrote:

When coupled with the philosophical concept of determinism (the concept that everything that happens is the direct and only result of what has come before) you get Hard Determinism. This is the position I subscribe to. I believe that everything that happens has a direct and specific cause (when I roll a dice and it lands on a 6, it does so because I threw the dice in a certain way from a certain height and starting point; and, if I did the exact same thing again in the exact same conditions, I'd get the same result) and I don't believe we have any real control over our own actions or what happens to us.


And this is where you fall down, and why engineers will always pwn arts students.

The fact is, the non deterministic nature of the universe was settled by physists decades ago. I sure hope I spelled that correctly. According to the theories, when you get right down to the subatomic level, determinism breaks down. It's quite nasty stuff actually. You have subatomic particles that exist everywhere until someone looks at them, and cats in boxes that are dead and alive at the same time.

Unfortuantely this is not philosophical theory but scientific fact - or as close to fact as you can get in the strange world of quantum mechanics.

The Casimir effect, again I hope I speleed that right, is an excellent example of quantum weirdness at work. Energy coming out of a vacuum, literally created out of nothing but space. And the decay of a radioactive element, another great example. You know it will happen but you never know when .. and if the universe were to be repeated it wouldn't necessarily fire at the same time as it did the first time around.

So on the most basic level determinism gets owned. How this translates to the macro world is open to debate. Buddhists believe in chaos theory, and I'm inclined to agree with them. If Schroedinger's cat is dead, Hitler never betrayed Stalin and won the second world war. Heil!

I do so wish this universe was deterministic. And that I had a time machine so I could go back in time and have massive sex orgies with myself.


Better go tell your philosopher buddies that determinism was left behind in the 19th century.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:28 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=vIzQyskCEPs
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Nick - Pie Man 



Joined: 04 Aug 2010


PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Free will, determinism and the criminal justice systemReply with quote

You are right David, this topic is awesome. Pity you can't take any credit for it, as it is wholly determined by forces outside your control. Cool

David wrote:
In other words, Hard Interdeterminists believe that randomness is no more friendly to free will than predetermination; both take all the power away from us.


I am glad something makes them hard anyway.

These chaps have got themselves into a lather over what is essentially a question of semantics. Takes all the power away from us - what are we?? What is the thing that has or doesn't have the free will?

If it's not the soul (Erectile Determinists are not Metaphysical whatsits) and its not the atoms, whats left?

If we are our atoms, then how is it that either deterministic or random interactions between our tiny bits takes power away from us? They are us!

What the hell is us??

This thing called 'consciousness', which is not a soul, and is not atoms, and is some sort of great cosmic joke, or delusion.

Who or what is being deluded?????

THAT is the question philosophers have been trying to answer since the start of time.

Sort out your semantics. You can't say there's no free will without specifying who or what is supposed to have or not have it.

Quote:

The last major view, that of the bearded fellow in the video above, is Compatibilism that is, the view that everything that happens is determined but free will still exists. Theirs is a complex argument that goes something like this: free will in the classical sense may not exist, but we think it does, and we act as if it does, so isn't what we have more or less the same thing anyway?


Nice and pragmatic. + 1

Quote:
Some argue that this is just playing with semantics


The whole issue is just playing with semantics. Pointless wordplay.

Quote:
but what if you can't blame anybody for their actions, or hold people morally responsible? If so, you only institute punishment as deterrent, to protect society and to rehabilitate, and indeed you stop thinking about punishment as such and start thinking more about treatment. This is the conclusion that Greene and Cohen come to I recommend clicking on the link above and at least having a skim through their argument, it's fascinating stuff.


I don't disagree with the conclusion, although the reasoning is farcical. Can't hold anyone responsible? Of course you can! Being responsible for things you have no control over is one of the foundations of adult life! I can't control my store's sales figures but I'm still responsible for them. Coaches can't control how many games their teams win, but they're still booed out at the end of the season if they do badly.

(It's not my fault I haven't returned those DVDs yet, but I'm still responsible Mad )

I do like the idea of rehabilitation, although 'treatment' sounds too much like brainwashing and Nazis for my taste.

But the reality is that most people are little more than apes with words, who would happily turn on one of their own if the poor sod fails to meet the society's expectations.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Tannin Capricorn

Can't remember


Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:34 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick - Pie Man wrote:
I wonder what would happen if I did build such a computer. Would it simulate itself simulating itself?


HAL spends way, way too much time stimulating himself.

_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group