Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Form ladder 2013

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 9, 10, 11  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:51 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

No I wouldn't. We would have beaten the GWS by more than 40 points even on our form on Thursday. As for spirit, who says? You can play with spirit and still lose. I'd have Richmond and Essendon highest on that count.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
jack_spain Aries



Joined: 03 May 2008


PostPosted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
No I wouldn't. We would have beaten the GWS by more than 40 points even on our form on Thursday. As for spirit, who says? You can play with spirit and still lose. I'd have Richmond and Essendon highest on that count.


We disrespect Port Adelaide at our peril. Last night's game was an absolutely brilliant fightback (Did you see it David? One of the best games of the year for pure football.). You don't win those without fantastic spirit. Ken Hinkley will prove to be the best coach in football. He's been waiting for a senior spot for years, and all the interviews I've seen with Port players show that he is a brilliant man manager and motivator. He's pretty sharp with his footy nous as well.

And so much for the Tiger spirit, they've dropped two in a row. Laughing

The Bombers are just the Peptide kings. I don't think they have any spirit other than roid rage. Razz
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Warnings : 1 
John Wren Virgo

"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."


Joined: 15 Jul 2007


PostPosted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 8:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

north couldn't quite get over the line against a subpar hawthorn. cracker of a game nonetheless.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Round 5 form ladder:

1. Geelong
2. Hawthorn
3. Essendon
4. Sydney
5. Collingwood
6. Fremantle
7. Richmond
8. Carlton

9. North Melbourne
10. Port Adelaide
11. West Coast
12. Adelaide
13. St. Kilda
14. Gold Coast
15. Western Bulldogs
16. Brisbane
17. Melbourne
18. GWS

I actually can't see any good reason to change last week's ladder, apart from moving St. Kilda above the Gold Coast (it strikes me that the Saints have actually been reasonably competitive against Essendon, Sydney and Richmond now; perhaps I've been overly harsh on them). Otherwise, who would you move? None of Geelong, Hawthorn or Sydney particularly impressed, though I still don't think Essendon's worthy of a top 2 spot. And we're still probably ahead of Fremantle and Richmond. Can't get Port any higher. Perhaps this is a good thing? Confused

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 2:40 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Whatever happens on Saturday, the bookies seem to be agreeing with me on North and Port:

North Melbourne (1 wins, 4 losses): $1.38
Port Adelaide (5 wins, 0 losses): $3.05

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
John Wren Virgo

"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."


Joined: 15 Jul 2007


PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 3:50 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
Whatever happens on Saturday, the bookies seem to be agreeing with me on North and Port:

North Melbourne (1 wins, 4 losses): $1.38
Port Adelaide (5 wins, 0 losses): $3.05


what's your point?

_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:28 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

That 'form' is about far more than mere win/loss ratio. Perhaps I'm labouring the point, but I feel like these two teams have provided an unusually stark example of it.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
John Wren Virgo

"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."


Joined: 15 Jul 2007


PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:21 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
That 'form' is about far more than mere win/loss ratio. Perhaps I'm labouring the point, but I feel like these two teams have provided an unusually stark example of it.


indeed the form ladder is more than just the w/l ratio. my question was mischievous given that you do often labour your points.

case in point, we have won four games but are hardly in form. i would venture to say that carlton are in better form than us.

anyway, you will be pleased with yesterday's result. though, north looked far from convincing.

_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 2:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep, although given I've only had them one place above them for the last couple of weeks, I guess a close result was fitting.

Not sure about Carlton. I think they're possibly a top 8 side — just — but don't forget they lost to Richmond (who we beat soundly) and, of course, lost to us. There's scope for improvement, but I think we're traveling a little better at present.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
jack_spain Aries



Joined: 03 May 2008


PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 2:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

John Wren wrote:
David wrote:
That 'form' is about far more than mere win/loss ratio. Perhaps I'm labouring the point, but I feel like these two teams have provided an unusually stark example of it.


indeed the form ladder is more than just the w/l ratio. my question was mischievous given that you do often labour your points.

case in point, we have won four games but are hardly in form. i would venture to say that carlton are in better form than us.

anyway, you will be pleased with yesterday's result. though, north looked far from convincing.


Spot on JW! Yes we have won four, but on form I'd have us no higher than 10th at the moment. Arguably North Melbourne has been playing better football than us, just getting beaten until yesterday. You could make a case that Richmond has been better than us too (despite losing to us).
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Warnings : 1 
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 2:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

None of those teams have beaten anyone that we wouldn't have beaten. I thought Richmond were playing superbly until late in the third quarter last night, but they fell away badly and ended up getting thrashed (just like us against Essendon). I have them around 6th or 7th at present.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 12:28 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Round 7 form ladder:

1. Geelong
2. Hawthorn
3. Essendon
4. Fremantle
5. Sydney
6. Collingwood
7. Richmond
8. North Melbourne

9. Carlton
10. Port Adelaide
11. Adelaide
12. West Coast
13. St. Kilda
14. Gold Coast
15. Brisbane
16. Western Bulldogs
17. Melbourne
18. GWS

Geelong well out on top now. Hawthorn look ominous at times, but they nearly lost to mid-range teams in rounds 5 and 6, while Essendon haven't been impressive since Anzac Day. As for Sydney, can't justify having them in the top 4 any more — who have they even beaten? We're still 6th for the time being, although it was only our convincing win against them in round 4 that stopped me from putting Richmond above us.

Otherwise, the rest seems about right. What do you think?

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
John Wren Virgo

"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."


Joined: 15 Jul 2007


PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 12:34 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

how can north not be ahead of us? we're not sixth on form. this is rubbish david.

gcs have won more quarters than us. our defence is only marginally better than some of the bottom four teams.

_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 12:40 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, we beat them for one. Otherwise, here are our respective performances:

Wins: Carlton (good), Richmond (good), St. Kilda (unconvincing)
Losses: Hawthorn, Essendon, Fremantle

North, on the other hand:

Wins: Brisbane (easy), Port (OK), Bulldogs (easy)
Losses: Geelong (close), Sydney (not close), Hawthorn (close)

They've certainly shown more in their losses — particularly the two games against Geelong and Hawthorn — but our wins have been more impressive than theirs and, lest it be forgotten, we beat them. I think that tends to suggest they're in the right place.

It does seem strange that we're in 6th at the moment, but this is a strange season — the ladder seems very tiered. There haven't been many upsets. We're somewhere in that 6-12 pack, and we just happen to have beaten all of those teams that we've played (and I'd back us in to beat Port, Adelaide and West Coast, too). I think 6th is actually about right.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
John Wren Virgo

"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."


Joined: 15 Jul 2007


PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 12:44 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

what does your ladder look like using a four week window, i.e. the last four rounds? going back to round one is too big a span. we have lost three of the last four. that is no form.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 3 of 11   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group