The 2021 Great Big Consolidated Trade & Draft thread

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
robevpau1
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:37 am

Post by robevpau1 »

BazBoy
Posts: 11073
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 43 times

Post by BazBoy »

Dib from Oakleigh Chargers
Aged 19
Height 174cm
Weight 76kg
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40243
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by think positive »

really hope we keep lynch
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
MJ23
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by MJ23 »

^ I was told a few weeks ago Lynch was really keen to stay. Subsequently, Harvey signed with the Hawkes and it seems things may have changed.

Ive said all along I really want him to stay. IF he were to leave I think he is worth a heel of a lot. Just look at Ceglar after we developed him.
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
Pies2016
Posts: 6871
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 176 times

Post by Pies2016 »

There’s a lot of options available to Collingwood right now if they want to switch things up and get busy again through the draft.
As long as Daicos isnt called out at #1, the club isn’t far away ( points wise ) from positioning itself to shop around #27 and receive something more beneficial in return ( likely future second rounder )
The two scenarios that make the above easiest to achieve are either walk Lipinski to the PSD or trade out either Cox or Lynch for a pick around #50 odd.
I’d like to keep Lynch too but if trading him out was the difference between using pick 27 on something other than Daicos points, then I’m ok with the Lynch trade going through. We need to keep either one of Lynch or Cox and obviously there will be different views as to who should stay or go. I’m not overly fussed but I know I would prefer a future second rounder to either of them, given that we would keep the other anyway.
If Lynch goes and Cox stays on for a year, then we just join the back up ruckman merry go round next trade period. At least we would have plenty of picks to do so.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
23 YIPPEE!!!

Post by 23 YIPPEE!!! »

I want Cox gone
User avatar
thesoretoothsayer
Posts: 1109
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:15 am
Been liked: 23 times

Post by thesoretoothsayer »

^ Thank you for sharing your transgender journey with us.
User avatar
mattdally
Posts: 1479
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 10 times
Contact:

Post by mattdally »

Hearing Graeme Wright just now I would take away the following:
- JT not offered new contract - unlikely to be with us next year
- Cox not yet offered new contract - unlikely, but see what happens
- Lipinski - PSD is an option - preference is to not go down that path though

Key point he noted re Nick Daicos bid - we are only allowed to use the same number of picks as per available list spots to match the bid.

Therefore if we have 3 spots on our list, we can't use 27, 36, 43, 46, 48, 55, 58 to match it. We can only use 27, 36 and 43
Nifft
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 11:07 am

Post by Nifft »

North Melbourne Horne Francis
Western Bulldogs Darcy GWS
GWS Callaghan
GC Hobbs
Adelaide Daicos Collingwood
Where men are beasts and beasts are men
User avatar
think better
Posts: 3114
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 40 times

Post by think better »

thesoretoothsayer wrote:^ Thank you for sharing your transgender journey with us.
I probably laughed more than I should have at this one!
I think therefore I think - I think
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 23 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Nifft wrote:North Melbourne Horne Francis
Western Bulldogs Darcy GWS
GWS Callaghan
GC Hobbs
Adelaide Daicos Collingwood
Won't Happen.

Suns will bid for Daicos at the Latest
I am Da Man
User avatar
WhyPhilWhy?
Posts: 9547
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Location: Location:
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 37 times

Post by WhyPhilWhy? »

The Hawks offering up Mitchell, Wingard and O'Meara is interesting...
User avatar
masoncox
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 12:32 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by masoncox »

So Mitchell and O'meara up for sale at hawthorn and anybody 26 or over it seems.
The above 2 will be 28 next season.
Wanting first round picks it seems.
They are opting for a full rebuild.
We signed Pendles at 33 for 2 more years.
I was the only person on this board who thought it was risky.
It seems the draft over the years has become more focused on the age profiles.
I can't see many clubs being sucked into giving away great picks for aging stars.
Only those clubs who are convinced they are in the premiership window would apply.
Pies2016
Posts: 6871
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 176 times

Post by Pies2016 »

mattdally wrote: Key point he noted re Nick Daicos bid - we are only allowed to use the same number of picks as per available list spots to match the bid.

Therefore if we have 3 spots on our list, we can't use 27, 36, 43, 46, 48, 55, 58 to match it. We can only use 27, 36 and 43
Cheers MD. I’m under the impression this is why we have so many unsigned players at the moment. The club will have to continue to run the numbers carefully until it all comes together at crunch time. Obviously Mayne and Greenwood are already off the primary list. Thomas looks in trouble and Lipinski is an upgrade on Sier, so there’s a start. Lynch, Cox and Rantall are all unsigned. Not sure on contract status of Madgen or Chugg ?
They would be looking at trading out a couple during this trade window, delisting others shortly after the trade period and also promising to re sign those left via the rookie draft ( possibly Rantall ) The other option is to keep rolling up those later picks together and turning them into one earlier pick.
It’s just another piece to the AFL F / S bidding process jigsaw.
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7709
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 185 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

Sam Mitchell personally calling clubs asking for first round picks in exchange for older Hawks players, what a flog
Post Reply