Scott Pendlebury (Silk)

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Deja Vu
Posts: 4411
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am

Post by Deja Vu »

Dal Santo???

Let's get one thing straight - Pendles does not display "Dal Santo" like qualities - he's not a wanker for one thing!

Nicky Dal wishes he was half the player Pendles is, instead of just half a mongrel...
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Pendlebury will win the Brownlow IF he loses the dreadlocks

Post by jack_spain »

Look we all know that the umpires are very conservative creatures. They don't need much provocation to award free kicks and votes against Collingwood players.

Poor Dane Swan can't win because he has permanent tattoos.

But please Scott Pendlebury lose the dreadlocks. That's something you can change. Short-back-and-sides (like Sooky-la-la of St Buggery) and you'd be a sure winner of the Charlie in 2011.
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

Pendles obviously went to Andy D's hairdresser in the summer, and was told the dreads were in, mon.
User avatar
Collingwood 4 eternity
Posts: 5271
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:00 am

Re: Pendlebury will win the Brownlow IF he loses the dreadlo

Post by Collingwood 4 eternity »

jack_spain wrote:Look we all know that the umpires are very conservative creatures. They don't need much provocation to award free kicks and votes against Collingwood players.

Poor Dane Swan can't win because he has permanent tattoos.

But please Scott Pendlebury lose the dreadlocks. That's something you can change. Short-back-and-sides (like Sooky-la-la of St Buggery) and you'd be a sure winner of the Charlie in 2011.
I think it's a Peace sign from Pendles to you jack_spain

http://twitpic.com/46dvd9
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
1990 Grand Final :
"From the back pocket, this will be probably the last kick, he need not even kick it, the drought is over. 32 years they've waited, let the celebrations begin" Sandy Roberts
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Post by jack_spain »

The Prototype wrote:Pendles obviously went to Andy D's hairdresser in the summer, and was told the dreads were in, mon.
They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Re: Pendlebury will win the Brownlow IF he loses the dreadlo

Post by jack_spain »

Collingwood 4 eternity wrote:
jack_spain wrote:Look we all know that the umpires are very conservative creatures. They don't need much provocation to award free kicks and votes against Collingwood players.

Poor Dane Swan can't win because he has permanent tattoos.

But please Scott Pendlebury lose the dreadlocks. That's something you can change. Short-back-and-sides (like Sooky-la-la of St Buggery) and you'd be a sure winner of the Charlie in 2011.
I think it's a Peace sign from Pendles to you jack_spain

http://twitpic.com/46dvd9
Oh dear! Looks like he's taken on the rasta religion mon and has been smoking the holy weed. :P
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

jack_spain wrote:They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.
That could explain why there were so many freekicks missed Collingwood's way tonight.. :lol: 8)
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Post by jack_spain »

The Prototype wrote:
jack_spain wrote:They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.
That could explain why there were so many freekicks missed Collingwood's way tonight.. :lol: 8)
Yeah, we are seen to be too left wing at Collingwood. Just have a look at VPT. :wink:

Besides, Ablett and Judd show that you probably have to go all the way with the umpires these days to get Brownlow votes. :P

I mean you need to shave your hair off.
Last edited by jack_spain on Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Collingwood 4 eternity
Posts: 5271
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:00 am

Post by Collingwood 4 eternity »

jack_spain wrote:
The Prototype wrote:Pendles obviously went to Andy D's hairdresser in the summer, and was told the dreads were in, mon.
They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.
He only had on "Ball" didn't he , so that explains why the free kicks dry up after the first is given.
1990 Grand Final :
"From the back pocket, this will be probably the last kick, he need not even kick it, the drought is over. 32 years they've waited, let the celebrations begin" Sandy Roberts
User avatar
1970
Posts: 803
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:45 pm

Post by 1970 »

Last year proved the Brownlow is a load of shit. Seriously. It's irrelevant as far as anyone who actually watches football is concerned.

So...

First - Pendles gets dreads so he doesn't have to win it, thereby avoiding any future comparisons with Judd. It's just belittling.

Second - Within an unspecified time frame, we give the heave ho to the Pratt Cup!

Third - if Pendles owns dreads Harry might fire up the afro which is sorely missed by at least 7 people i can think of. No, it's actually only 11.

You know it makes sense.
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19603
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 17 times

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

Rather, just lose them 'cos they look ridiculous. Does anyone really care about the brownlow? I mean, really, really care?
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
User avatar
magpietragic
Posts: 462
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:33 pm

Post by magpietragic »

I must be the only but I actually like them! :oops:

If he keeps playing like he did last night, who cares!

Stuff the umpires, I am sure Judd picked up the 3 votes anyway!
User avatar
jack_spain
Posts: 23349
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Post by jack_spain »

1970 wrote:Last year proved the Brownlow is a load of shit. Seriously. It's irrelevant as far as anyone who actually watches football is concerned.

So...

First - Pendles gets dreads so he doesn't have to win it, thereby avoiding any future comparisons with Judd. It's just belittling.

Second - Within an unspecified time frame, we give the heave ho to the Pratt Cup!

Third - if Pendles owns dreads Harry might fire up the afro which is sorely missed by at least 7 people i can think of. No, it's actually only 11.

You know it makes sense.
It does make sense. :lol:
User avatar
Clemo
Posts: 4039
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 1998 8:01 pm
Location: Mentone

Post by Clemo »

Who cares about the Brownlow. If Pendels wants to keep the dreads - then good on him. I wish I had dreads. ;)
Go Pies !!!!
User avatar
tomoleary
Posts: 3081
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Rosanna

Post by tomoleary »

I don't care a hell off a lot what the players look like. I just want them to be able to play!
Post Reply