Scott Pendlebury (Silk)

Deja Vu · Post by **Deja Vu** » Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:10 pm

Dal Santo???

Let's get one thing straight - Pendles does not display "Dal Santo" like qualities - he's not a wanker for one thing!

Nicky Dal wishes he was half the player Pendles is, instead of just half a mongrel...

jack_spain · Post by **jack_spain** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:57 am

Look we all know that the umpires are very conservative creatures. They don't need much provocation to award free kicks and votes against Collingwood players.

Poor Dane Swan can't win because he has permanent tattoos.

But please Scott Pendlebury lose the dreadlocks. That's something you can change. Short-back-and-sides (like Sooky-la-la of St Buggery) and you'd be a sure winner of the Charlie in 2011.

The Prototype · Post by **The Prototype** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:58 am

Pendles obviously went to Andy D's hairdresser in the summer, and was told the dreads were in, mon.

Collingwood 4 eternity · Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:07 am

jack_spain wrote:Look we all know that the umpires are very conservative creatures. They don't need much provocation to award free kicks and votes against Collingwood players.

Poor Dane Swan can't win because he has permanent tattoos.

But please Scott Pendlebury lose the dreadlocks. That's something you can change. Short-back-and-sides (like Sooky-la-la of St Buggery) and you'd be a sure winner of the Charlie in 2011.

I think it's a Peace sign from Pendles to you jack_spain

http://twitpic.com/46dvd9

jack_spain · Post by **jack_spain** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:08 am

The Prototype wrote:Pendles obviously went to Andy D's hairdresser in the summer, and was told the dreads were in, mon.

They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.

jack_spain · Post by **jack_spain** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:12 am

Collingwood 4 eternity wrote:
jack_spain wrote:Look we all know that the umpires are very conservative creatures. They don't need much provocation to award free kicks and votes against Collingwood players.

Poor Dane Swan can't win because he has permanent tattoos.

But please Scott Pendlebury lose the dreadlocks. That's something you can change. Short-back-and-sides (like Sooky-la-la of St Buggery) and you'd be a sure winner of the Charlie in 2011.
I think it's a Peace sign from Pendles to you jack_spain

http://twitpic.com/46dvd9

Oh dear! Looks like he's taken on the rasta religion mon and has been smoking the holy weed.

The Prototype · Post by **The Prototype** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:15 am

jack_spain wrote:They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.

That could explain why there were so many freekicks missed Collingwood's way tonight..

jack_spain · Post by **jack_spain** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:20 am

The Prototype wrote:
jack_spain wrote:They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.
That could explain why there were so many freekicks missed Collingwood's way tonight..

Yeah, we are seen to be too left wing at Collingwood. Just have a look at VPT.

Besides, Ablett and Judd show that you probably have to go all the way with the umpires these days to get Brownlow votes.

I mean you need to shave your hair off.

Collingwood 4 eternity · Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:20 am

jack_spain wrote:
The Prototype wrote:Pendles obviously went to Andy D's hairdresser in the summer, and was told the dreads were in, mon.
They might be in Fitzroy or Brunswick. But most umpires look like this bloke and have as much tolerance.

He only had on "Ball" didn't he , so that explains why the free kicks dry up after the first is given.

1970 · Post by **1970** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:27 am

Last year proved the Brownlow is a load of shit. Seriously. It's irrelevant as far as anyone who actually watches football is concerned.

So...

First - Pendles gets dreads so he doesn't have to win it, thereby avoiding any future comparisons with Judd. It's just belittling.

Second - Within an unspecified time frame, we give the heave ho to the Pratt Cup!

Third - if Pendles owns dreads Harry might fire up the afro which is sorely missed by at least 7 people i can think of. No, it's actually only 11.

You know it makes sense.

Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:18 am

Rather, just lose them 'cos they look ridiculous. Does anyone really care about the brownlow? I mean, really, really care?

magpietragic · Post by **magpietragic** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:13 am

I must be the only but I actually like them!

If he keeps playing like he did last night, who cares!

Stuff the umpires, I am sure Judd picked up the 3 votes anyway!

jack_spain · Post by **jack_spain** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:17 am

1970 wrote:Last year proved the Brownlow is a load of shit. Seriously. It's irrelevant as far as anyone who actually watches football is concerned.

So...

First - Pendles gets dreads so he doesn't have to win it, thereby avoiding any future comparisons with Judd. It's just belittling.

Second - Within an unspecified time frame, we give the heave ho to the Pratt Cup!

Third - if Pendles owns dreads Harry might fire up the afro which is sorely missed by at least 7 people i can think of. No, it's actually only 11.

You know it makes sense.

It does make sense.

Clemo · Post by **Clemo** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:29 am

Who cares about the Brownlow. If Pendels wants to keep the dreads - then good on him. I wish I had dreads.

tomoleary · Post by **tomoleary** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:35 am

I don't care a hell off a lot what the players look like. I just want them to be able to play!

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

Scott Pendlebury (Silk)

Pendlebury will win the Brownlow IF he loses the dreadlocks

Re: Pendlebury will win the Brownlow IF he loses the dreadlo

Re: Pendlebury will win the Brownlow IF he loses the dreadlo