??? Tarrant's been brilliant for us in recent weeks, genuinely baffled by this comment. Can't remember him dropping anything last night.eddiesmith wrote:Atleast up forward his dropping of uncontested marks wont immediately cost us a goal the other way...ADRIAN25 wrote:At Game Day this morning. Maxy said Buckley had tightness in the back. If played would have been the sub. He thought Blair will come in for Swan. He also said that the club is trying there best for Nathan Brown to be back between round 17 to 19. Moving Tarrent to forward line then.
Post Match. Pies wallop Saints - all comments please
Moderator: bbmods
- Invigoration
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:45 pm
- jack_spain
- Posts: 23349
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm
The reality is though guys, Collingwood games will mostly be on free-to-air. I won't be rushing out to take up Foxtel. If I want to see those games I'll go to a local sporty pub.Doc63 wrote:There will be no way known I'll be giving up my Legends membership just to get Foxtel. I barely have enough time to watch the games that are on free to air, let alone 9 games every weekend. Other than the footy & a few other sports, its crap.mattys123 wrote:You can hold off your AFL membership for one year though, so many will do that next year, if they haven't already.Brenny wrote:I believe AFL memberships might drop off. I'm sure there are people out there who will have to make decisions...
Memberships or Foxtel. At current rates, Foxtel is $60 pm for spots. $720 a year.
My bro-in-law is doing exactly that, as he has 2 young kids (2yo and 6 months) and simply can't get to most games, so he will hold his membership over for one year (at no cost) and buy Foxtel for 12 Months.
Many will do likewise.
It will be interesting to see if Collingwood's membership numbers can keep growing also, but I think the 3 game option helps here, as I think many more will take up a 3 game membership next year, maybe even cutting back from an 11 of 18 gamer.
Even if things got tough financially, Id rather sell a kidney than give up my Legends membership.
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:45 pm
- Been liked: 2 times
He dropped an easy(ish) one in the second quarter that led directly to a Saints goal that gave them the lead. If Brown is ready to go, is there any chance either Tarrant or Dawes could take Leroy's role as the 3rd tall / 2nd ruck? Hawthorn's had success playing "undersized" Roughead in the ruck and Leroy hasn't been giving us much all season, apart from the quarter of his life against the Bullflogs?Invigoration wrote:??? Tarrant's been brilliant for us in recent weeks, genuinely baffled by this comment. Can't remember him dropping anything last night.eddiesmith wrote:Atleast up forward his dropping of uncontested marks wont immediately cost us a goal the other way...ADRIAN25 wrote:At Game Day this morning. Maxy said Buckley had tightness in the back. If played would have been the sub. He thought Blair will come in for Swan. He also said that the club is trying there best for Nathan Brown to be back between round 17 to 19. Moving Tarrent to forward line then.
"We ain't gotta dream no more"
- jack_spain
- Posts: 23349
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:48 pm
Correct. Didn't you see the screamer?Invigoration wrote:??? Tarrant's been brilliant for us in recent weeks, genuinely baffled by this comment. Can't remember him dropping anything last night.eddiesmith wrote:Atleast up forward his dropping of uncontested marks wont immediately cost us a goal the other way...ADRIAN25 wrote:At Game Day this morning. Maxy said Buckley had tightness in the back. If played would have been the sub. He thought Blair will come in for Swan. He also said that the club is trying there best for Nathan Brown to be back between round 17 to 19. Moving Tarrent to forward line then.
Eddiesmith is to Tarrant what Pants is to Maxwell.
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
It was an absolute shocking drop, you wont see any worse than that by a defenderDuff Soviet Union wrote:He dropped an easy(ish) one in the second quarter that led directly to a Saints goal that gave them the lead. If Brown is ready to go, is there any chance either Tarrant or Dawes could take Leroy's role as the 3rd tall / 2nd ruck? Hawthorn's had success playing "undersized" Roughead in the ruck and Leroy hasn't been giving us much all season, apart from the quarter of his life against the Bullflogs?Invigoration wrote:??? Tarrant's been brilliant for us in recent weeks, genuinely baffled by this comment. Can't remember him dropping anything last night.eddiesmith wrote:Atleast up forward his dropping of uncontested marks wont immediately cost us a goal the other way...ADRIAN25 wrote:At Game Day this morning. Maxy said Buckley had tightness in the back. If played would have been the sub. He thought Blair will come in for Swan. He also said that the club is trying there best for Nathan Brown to be back between round 17 to 19. Moving Tarrent to forward line then.
As for Tarrant replacing Leroy, are you kidding me? Leroy is definately ahead of Tarrant in the pecking order, if N.Brown comes back then Tarrant goes and he works on taking out someone at training
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:45 pm
- Been liked: 2 times
I'm happy with Taz at full back. That one drop aside, he's been rock solid all season and everyone's entitled to the odd mistake even if it does cost a goal. I just think ultimately the team might be better off with Nathan Brown at full back (if he's properly recovered of course. Otherwise this is all moot), and Tarrant as the third tall forward. He can take a mark, he's mobile and his forward pressure is honed from playing as a defender. As for his kicking at goal...well hopefully he can handball to someone. I think if he can play on the ball, even for only 5-10 minutes a quarter, he'd be excellent for Leroy's role. He'd almost be a combination of Leroy and Macca actually and give us the freedom to play an extra midfielder or small forward. All this is weeks away obviously.
"We ain't gotta dream no more"
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
He has been ok as a defender but yeah Nathan Brown definately takes his spot when fitDuff Soviet Union wrote:I'm happy with Taz at full back. That one drop aside, he's been rock solid all season and everyone's entitled to the odd mistake even if it does cost a goal. I just think ultimately the team might be better off with Nathan Brown at full back (if he's properly recovered of course. Otherwise this is all moot), and Tarrant as the third tall forward. He can take a mark, he's mobile and his forward pressure is honed from playing as a defender. As for his kicking at goal...well hopefully he can handball to someone. I think if he can play on the ball, even for only 5-10 minutes a quarter, he'd be excellent for Leroy's role. He'd almost be a combination of Leroy and Macca actually and give us the freedom to play an extra midfielder or small forward. All this is weeks away obviously.
But I dont see him being an improvement on Leigh Brown at all, things might change by the end of the year and he might get lucky again, but if everyones fit then Tarrant is out
- jackcass
- Posts: 12529
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Bendigo
From memory, dropped one going back with the flight of the ball. Hardly a hanging offence.Invigoration wrote:??? Tarrant's been brilliant for us in recent weeks, genuinely baffled by this comment. Can't remember him dropping anything last night.eddiesmith wrote:Atleast up forward his dropping of uncontested marks wont immediately cost us a goal the other way...ADRIAN25 wrote:At Game Day this morning. Maxy said Buckley had tightness in the back. If played would have been the sub. He thought Blair will come in for Swan. He also said that the club is trying there best for Nathan Brown to be back between round 17 to 19. Moving Tarrent to forward line then.
Was at the game and as soon as Tarrant dropped that mark and it went in for a goal Tarrant signaled to Leon with a hand gesture suggesting 'where was the talk' so wasn't entirely Tarrant's fault.jackcass wrote:From memory, dropped one going back with the flight of the ball. Hardly a hanging offence.Invigoration wrote:??? Tarrant's been brilliant for us in recent weeks, genuinely baffled by this comment. Can't remember him dropping anything last night.eddiesmith wrote:Atleast up forward his dropping of uncontested marks wont immediately cost us a goal the other way...ADRIAN25 wrote:At Game Day this morning. Maxy said Buckley had tightness in the back. If played would have been the sub. He thought Blair will come in for Swan. He also said that the club is trying there best for Nathan Brown to be back between round 17 to 19. Moving Tarrent to forward line then.
- GoWoodsmen
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:18 am
- Location: Australia
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
- GoWoodsmen
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:18 am
- Location: Australia
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
- GoWoodsmen
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:18 am
- Location: Australia