Scott Pendlebury (Silk)

Sat Oct 08, 2011 1:57 pm

Apologies for going off topic but am I the only person who thinks that 'wasteofspace' character is still with us?

lol, I remember when I joined Nick's (a few days before this thread) and he thought I was magpie greg!

The Prototype · Post by **The Prototype** » Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:34 pm

frankiboy wrote:Apologies for going off topic but am I the only person who thinks that 'wasteofspace' character is still with us?

lol, I remember when I joined Nick's (a few days before this thread) and he thought I was magpie greg!

It wouldn't surprise me if he's still lurking around here somewhere, just waiting for his chance to re-appear.

Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:45 pm

ClokingDevice · Post by **ClokingDevice** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:15 pm

Obviously restricted but can still set up like no other.. let the howls of protest begin starting with the despised term 'Quarterback role'

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:18 pm

His clearance work is enough to justify his position in the middle. Who do you propose replaces him in the midfield?

MJ23 · Post by **MJ23** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:20 pm

Joel wrote:His clearance work is enough to justify his position in the middle. Who do you propose replaces him in the midfield?

correct
His good is better than most.
His best is better than all

Be better forward anyway

ClokingDevice · Post by **ClokingDevice** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:23 pm

Joel wrote:His clearance work is enough to justify his position in the middle. Who do you propose replaces him in the midfield?

Yeah it's a pity we don't have any other midfield stars.. we have to do something, it straight sets the way we are playing

Big moves can sometimes turn it around ala Jarman to FF when the Cows lost Modra.. can't just go in the way we have been or it's death

Funkadelic · Post by **Funkadelic** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:31 pm

I agree we have to throw some curveballs, but i think pendles is too important in the middle. Plus i thought maxy was the 3rd man unaccountable player down back! (jokes people, i love maxy)

Lazza · Post by **Lazza** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:34 pm

Joel wrote:His clearance work is enough to justify his position in the middle. Who do you propose replaces him in the midfield?

Blair?

Member 7167 · Post by **Member 7167** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:56 pm

With due respect, anybody who would consider putting Pendles in the back line must be on drugs. Forward at time throughout the game - most certainly, but putting him back for long periods of time would be counterproductive. He certainly hsa not been in best form since breaking his leg (who would be) but he still much better than most. What we are missing in the middle is Ball and his hard ball gets.

ClokingDevice · Post by **ClokingDevice** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:06 pm

Member 7167 wrote:With due respect, anybody who would consider putting Pendles in the back line must be on drugs.

I don't think that had too much to do with it

At the moment he's just a good ordinary player as Jack Dyer would say, but down back his disposal would create something very difficult to stop and wouldn't be as demanding on his body

ps: 'With due respect' is internet code for I'm a passive aggressive little pussy

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:10 pm

Lazza wrote:
Joel wrote:His clearance work is enough to justify his position in the middle. Who do you propose replaces him in the midfield?
Blair?

I hope you are not being serious (hence the roll eyes). I like Blair, but he isn't in the same league.

Tannin · Post by **Tannin** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:02 pm

Joel wrote:
Lazza wrote:
Joel wrote:His clearance work is enough to justify his position in the middle. Who do you propose replaces him in the midfield?
Blair?
I hope you are not being serious (hence the roll eyes). I like Blair, but he isn't in the same league.

Actually, he is. It's called "the Australian Football League" and it plays in Melbourne. (Also in some other cities around Australia.) Matches are held several times a week during the season. They are rather good. You should go to one.

Beast · Post by **Beast** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:08 pm

Won't happen, he might not be in the best of nicks but he's still our main contested ball winner in the guts in the absence of Bally. The area we sadly lacked in this year.

What'sinaname · Post by **What'sinaname** » Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:12 pm

ClokingDevice wrote:Obviously restricted but can still set up like no other.. let the howls of protest begin starting with the despised term 'Quarterback role'

If he has 40 pass attempts like a QB, that's 40 free kicks paid against him for a throw in our back half. That's just stupid.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

Scott Pendlebury (Silk)

Pendlebury to half back

Re: Pendlebury to half back