#32 Travis Cloke

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
makri
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:24 pm
Location: Clifton Hill
Been liked: 2 times
Contact:

Post by makri »

eddiesmith wrote:
Robbie wrote:This sad situation will never stop until David undertands his good work has cost two of his three sons their careers.

I hope he is a better man than he appears, and puts the furture of Travis above those of his media popularity. All of us at Collingwood want him to stay however, we would all prefer he finds a place to find his talent again regardless of the club.

There are no Collingwood supporters that want you to stay at Collinwood however, if it's impossible for your Dad, do what you can to stay in the game because you are a better footballer than your Dad ever was.
Mick Malthouse cost the first 2 boys their careers and now everyone reckons Travis has signed a deal to join Carlton WITH Mick? Its hilarious :lol:
I agrree with you on this one.

Malthouse should have been sacked for playing Jason up forward in the '03 GF and then his subsequent comments about Jason's performance, but that is content for another thread.....
User avatar
uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
Posts: 4929
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Under negotiation

Post by uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR »

You don't have to read between the lines to realise that The Club & the Clokes are not on the same page. It seems they have tried, but just haven't been able to get there.

Obviously something would have to change before the year is out and I would guess that The Cub doesn't have as much room to move as the Clokes.

It's up to him.
User avatar
uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
Posts: 4929
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Under negotiation

Post by uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR »

nulla wrote: The Salary Cap has caused this problem
A club in a position like Collingwood should NOT be losing players to salary cap restraints.
User avatar
The Weed
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:25 pm

Post by The Weed »

eddiesmith wrote:
Robbie wrote:This sad situation will never stop until David undertands his good work has cost two of his three sons their careers.

I hope he is a better man than he appears, and puts the furture of Travis above those of his media popularity. All of us at Collingwood want him to stay however, we would all prefer he finds a place to find his talent again regardless of the club.

There are no Collingwood supporters that want you to stay at Collinwood however, if it's impossible for your Dad, do what you can to stay in the game because you are a better footballer than your Dad ever was.
Mick Malthouse cost the first 2 boys their careers and now everyone reckons Travis has signed a deal to join Carlton WITH Mick? Its hilarious :lol:
What's hilarious is you think the first 2 Clokes had a career.
User avatar
magpieazza
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:27 am
Location: Griffith N.S.W

Post by magpieazza »

^^ Yep well said.

What do we in fact get for Travis in terms of draft picks?
Do we get more if we trade with GWS?
Is the AFL watering down the compensation for trading players, do they have a say in what Travis is worth?

I certainly hope and expect two first round draft picks for Travis and if anyone says he is not worth it then they are dreaming. The amount of blood, sweat, tears, time, and money gone into this fella is worth every bit of 2 first round draft picks surely.
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
User avatar
The Weed
Posts: 540
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:25 pm

Post by The Weed »

eddiesmith wrote:Oh no, not a form slump, what a disgrace, no player ever has those, he is struggling badly, about 3 goals worse off than last year at this stage, unacceptable

BTW suprised there has been no bagging of Ben Reid? The Cloke has gone thread sure sounded like Reid had been holding out for more money, combined with the fact he has been in absolutely shithouse form and gets bagged in every post match thread, that would keep up the consistency?

Oops, last names not Cloke, so no hate there ;)
Oops Eddie, not so good with maths, this time last year Cloke had kick 45 he now has 35, approx 22% decrease, so no objective facts there :oops: .
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

The Weed wrote:
eddiesmith wrote:Oh no, not a form slump, what a disgrace, no player ever has those, he is struggling badly, about 3 goals worse off than last year at this stage, unacceptable

BTW suprised there has been no bagging of Ben Reid? The Cloke has gone thread sure sounded like Reid had been holding out for more money, combined with the fact he has been in absolutely shithouse form and gets bagged in every post match thread, that would keep up the consistency?

Oops, last names not Cloke, so no hate there ;)
Oops Eddie, not so good with maths, this time last year Cloke had kick 45 he now has 35, approx 22% decrease, so no objective facts there :oops: .
It isn't about goals though, he's kicked a sh!t load of goals this year in junktime, rarely has he had an influenced on the result.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7857
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 3 times

Post by burnsy17 »

^^

Other than perhaps the WCE game.... but you'd want to influence more than 1 game a year if you're commanding $1M a year.
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Pie 65 wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote: And could you tell us the basis for the revelation that Liam Jurrah is "likely to get off"?
There was no machete on the charge sheet. Yet that is the weapon he is being charged to have made the attack with.

Liam's Lawyer has been able to prove that everyone other than one person was drunk at the time. The person who wasn't drunk has claimed that Liam was only using self defence.

The trial seems to be a dogs breakfast.
When you've been reading Nick's for a bit longer, you (and Beast) will, no doubt, come to appreciate that when I ask people about the purported basis for their opinion about a legal matter, it's an entirely rhetorical question.:shock:

What you were both discussing was the committal hearing, not the trial. Liam Jurrah has, as I understand the position, today been committed to stand trial at a later date.

I should say, for the record (and particularly bearing in mind Rudeboy's position) that I take no pleasure at all in the fact that the committal has turned out this way (or - for that matter - that it was always likely to do so). But your over-statements based on what were (I presume) news reports (if you were Tippet's instructing solicitor, you wouldn't have been posting about the case on Nick's) did make me wonder about the reliability of some other things you were posting.

The devil is, as they say, usually in the detail.
Pie 65

Post by Pie 65 »

Right then, we will see what happens at the trial. I still say he will get off.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Pie 65 wrote:Right then, we will see what happens at the trial. I still say he will get off.
No, you'll see. Predicting the future is not what I do for a living. I called you for over-reaching, not for guessing wrong.
Pie 65

Post by Pie 65 »

Seems there are different opinions of what exactly happened and it will end up, one person's word against another person's word. And most of it is contradictory. But you must know something else...

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/demons ... 6432167209

[Evidence given during this week's committal hearing has been contradictory.

The woman Jurrah allegedly assaulted did not mention his name while on the witness stand, while another alleged victim said they only argued and had no physical contact.

Basil Jurrah - who claims the footballer inflicted a "skull-deep" 7cm wound with a machete - admitted to being drunk at the time.

An eye-witness, meanwhile, said Basil was so drunk that night he could only stand and hold the machete, while Jurrah was acting to defend himself.

This morning, witness James Turner claimed Basil had brought the machete to the brawl.

Jurrah, he said, was "telling people to stop fighting".

Lawyers for Walker and Fry also asked the bulk of the charges be dismissed.

Walker's lawyer said that, at arraignment, he would plead guilty to causing Basil Jurrah harm.

Steve Robson, prosecuting, withdrew one of the charges because the alleged victim did not attend court to give evidence.

The remainder of the allegations, he said, should go to trial.
Last edited by Pie 65 on Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BHPIE
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Broken Hill

Post by BHPIE »

CLOKE IS NOT THAT GOOD ,NOT WORTH 500K LET ALONE 800-900K IT IS JUST COMMON SENSE.
User avatar
BBHS
Posts: 4975
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Bellarine
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by BBHS »

None of this makes one bit of sense to me anymore. I don't think he even understands what his demands are.

Has there been a more poorly handled contract negotiation...Tooves manager gave it a fair crack last year and the last contract Cloke signed comes a pretty close runner up.
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12396
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 24 times

Post by eddiesmith »

The Weed wrote:
eddiesmith wrote:Oh no, not a form slump, what a disgrace, no player ever has those, he is struggling badly, about 3 goals worse off than last year at this stage, unacceptable

BTW suprised there has been no bagging of Ben Reid? The Cloke has gone thread sure sounded like Reid had been holding out for more money, combined with the fact he has been in absolutely shithouse form and gets bagged in every post match thread, that would keep up the consistency?

Oops, last names not Cloke, so no hate there ;)
Oops Eddie, not so good with maths, this time last year Cloke had kick 45 he now has 35, approx 22% decrease, so no objective facts there :oops: .
If going to accuse others, get your own facts straight, he had kicked 43, it was also about this time he started hitting his straps and kicking multiple goals every week. This year he has actually been more consistent up untill the last couple of weeks when the whole team has been playing shit

It was only about 2-3 goals difference a couple of weeks ago when everyone kept saying how worse off he was and quoting year long averages to prove their points

Even if he finishes the year with 61-62 goals, its still a good year and would make a mockery of all this crap he is copping
Post Reply