Can we ban the Mick and Trav bashers please

Suggestions, praise, feedback. Need to communicate with the moderators? This is the place. If you need to communicate privately with the moderators, send email to lesbastardssinistres(at)magpies.net

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Nick - Pie Man
Posts: 7194
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:53 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Can we ban the Mick and Trav bashers please

Post by Nick - Pie Man »

They are ejaculating negativity everywhere and ruining Nick's
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12392
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 24 times

Post by eddiesmith »

Just wait untill next year, I think Daisy is out of contract, this could become a fun game every year :lol:
User avatar
Deja Vu
Posts: 4411
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am

Post by Deja Vu »

Daisy already gone. Part of Malthouse's contract at Carlton. Must get Daisy as a free agent at end of 2013, or he will not sign on.

Daisy has already agreed to it

Can't tell you how I know this, but I trust my source.




Is that how you do it?
User avatar
Nick - Pie Man
Posts: 7194
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:53 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Nick - Pie Man »

Daisy has already derailed our season. You'd think he'd be grateful, is this how he repays us?!? SIGN NOW DALE OR **** OFF TO CARLSCUM
User avatar
Nick - Pie Man
Posts: 7194
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:53 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Nick - Pie Man »

Eh, it's not as funny as it once was.

Ban the Mick haters please!
User avatar
eddiesmith
Posts: 12392
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
Location: Lexus Centre
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 24 times

Post by eddiesmith »

Deja Vu wrote:Daisy already gone. Part of Malthouse's contract at Carlton. Must get Daisy as a free agent at end of 2013, or he will not sign on.

Daisy has already agreed to it

Can't tell you how I know this, but I trust my source.




Is that how you do it?
Damn you, thats my rumour

So I might just wait 2 weeks, start a new thread and say I just heard from an impeccable source and act as if no one has mentioned it before :wink:
User avatar
Nick - Pie Man
Posts: 7194
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:53 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Nick - Pie Man »

If you aren't going to ban them, which is weird coz you delete threads whenever you feel like it and banning them would be a natural extension of that, then at least quarantine them. Confine them to a hidden board so that journos and scum from TalkingCarlton can't see their garbage and assume that we are all hysterical, irrational idiots.
User avatar
mandy
Posts: 5520
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Glen Iris

Post by mandy »

You know, it's not very otfen I agree with Nick but in this case he's right. Too few are ruining it for everyone else. GD is a nightmare to try and read anything decent without threads being hijacked by posters bleeting out the same shit over and over again.

Banning might be a bit extreme but warnings and maybe 24 hour timeouts might improve the site for the rest of us.

Jesus! We're on the eve of playing finals and hardly anyone is even talking about football! It's doing my head in....
#TEAMBUCKS
#TEAMEDDIE
#TEAMCOLLINGWOOD
#SIDEBYSIDE
Joel
Posts: 21161
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 1999 8:01 pm
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Joel »

mandy wrote:Banning might be a bit extreme but warnings and maybe 24 hour timeouts might improve the site for the rest of us.
Agreed. But then again, I used to get in trouble for "over moderating" when I was a mod. I'm all for open discussion, but the stream of crap that is posted in GD these days is beyond a joke.

By the way, there are a few mods listed that don't even really post on here anymore. Are all the mods still active, does this list need to be change?

http://magpies.net/nick/bb/rules.htm
Post Reply