#13 Dale Thomas

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Darkstranger wrote:
jack_spain wrote:
mudlark wrote:What a stupid frickin' post. EVERY player at some stage will come out of contract FFS give it a break!! It's still 2012 and next year will take care of itself. Daisy WILL be a one club player.
Hey clown, don't blame me. It was Nathan Buckley who stirred up this non-story. Read the article from Jon Pierek.

As usual on Nick's people shoot the messenger.



If I could shoot the messenger it'll be the giant size turd who started this thread.... Oh that's you JS...typical nothing positive about the Pies...

When will you finally get the message and F off our board?
METHINKS a lousy 5 month membership on Nicks hardly gives you creedence to tell people to f-ck off "our" Board, youve gotta put in a bit more posting time than that, say 3 years, to earn that right. ! :idea: :idea:
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Let me check my calendar and get back to you.
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29519
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 338 times

Post by Jezza »

Let's not fall into the media trap. The papers have to report on something and it was inevitable that they would discuss the Thomas contract situation.

We all predicted it earlier in the year on Nicks that Daisy would be the talk of the town in 2013. He still has another year left on his contract, so let's not jump on the bandwagon of accusing him to being un-loyal to the club. He re-signed with us a few years ago and there isn't any evidence to say he won't do it again in the near future, even though Mick has left the club, to whom Daisy was apparently very close to at the time.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
Post Reply