Things that make you go.......WTF?

[1061]

Put her on a Boat to Australia!

[5150]

Put her on a Boat to Australia!

Without the vest...

[1061]

Put her on a Boat to Australia!

Without the vest...

Now that you mention it she might get cold and there are many enclaves that could do with a vest.







[align=right]did I just say that[/align]

[stui magpie]

Chowing down a 2kg steak (looks more like a roast beef) in under 3 minutes, then going for the side dishes.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/food/m ... 6799081859

Vegetarians, do NOT watch the video at the link.

[think positive]

if it was medium rare, id give it a shot!!

[think positive]

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/world/ ... s-trolley/

[swoop42]

^So that's the reason for all those wonky trolley wheels in Coles.

Dirty bastards.

[HAL]

All?

[1061]

Just thinking this would be a criminal conviction has me going wtf.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-12/m ... ed/5195978

[David]

We've certainly come a long way in a relatively short period of time.

[Brenny]

Glad to hear it.

This totally blows my mind...

"Tom Anderson was charged with having gay sex in 1977 at the age of 14, despite being the victim of sexual abuse."

[stui magpie]

Everyone has the right to an opinion, some people abuse that.

This person, is just...............out there. The term Misandrist comes to mind. Wow.

http://witchwind.wordpress.com/2013/12/ ... s-rape-ok/

[swoop42]

Brynne and the old doc are no more.

And here I thought it was a love for the ages.

[David]

Everyone has the right to an opinion, some people abuse that.

This person, is just...............out there. The term Misandrist comes to mind. Wow.

http://witchwind.wordpress.com/2013/12/ ... s-rape-ok/

I'll call your misandry and raise you a double misandry with an extra pile of crazy:

http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm

(Admittedly, it is somewhat of a brilliant satirical piece made somewhat less funny by the fact that Solanas was actually homicidal and tried to kill poor old Andy Warhol because he didn't like the play she wrote. But I'm amazed by the claims in the Wikipedia article on radical feminism that Solanas played a huge role in its development. Ah well, I guess times were tougher back then... )

Anyway, enjoy the SCUM manifesto:

The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection of tenderness. He is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. His responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; his intelligence is a mere tool in the services of his drives and needs; he is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; he can't relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. He is a half-dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, he is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. He is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings -- hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt -- and moreover, he is aware of what he is and what he isn't.

Although completely physical, the male is unfit even for stud service. Even assuming mechanical proficiency, which few men have, he is, first of all, incapable of zestfully, lustfully, tearing off a piece, but instead is eaten up with guilt, shame, fear and insecurity, feelings rooted in male nature, which the most enlightened training can only minimize; second, the physical feeling he attains is next to nothing; and third, he is not empathizing with his partner, but is obsessed with how he's doing, turning in an A performance, doing a good plumbing job. To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo. It's often said that men use women. Use them for what? Surely not pleasure.

Eaten up with guilt, shame, fears and insecurities and obtaining, if he's lucky, a barely perceptible physical feeling, the male is, nonetheless, obsessed with screwing; he'll swim through a river of snot, wade nostril-deep through a mile of vomit, if he thinks there'll be a friendly pussy awaiting him. He'll screw a woman he despises, any snaggle-toothed hag, and furthermore, pay for the opportunity. Why? Relieving physical tension isn't the answer, as masturbation suffices for that. It's not ego satisfaction; that doesn't explain screwing corpses and babies.

Completely egocentric, unable to relate, empathize or identify, and filled with a vast, pervasive, diffuse sexuality, the male is pyschically passive. He hates his passivity, so he projects it onto women, defines the make as active, then sets out to prove that he is (`prove that he is a Man'). His main means of attempting to prove it is screwing (Big Man with a Big Dick tearing off a Big Piece). Since he's attempting to prove an error, he must `prove' it again and again. Screwing, then, is a desperate compulsive, attempt to prove he's not passive, not a woman; but he is passive and does want to be a woman.

Of course, as they say, feminism is a broad church. I hope people won't think I'm being too unfair, though, if I consider radical feminism to (mostly) be a broad asylum.

[David]