#28 Ben Sinclair

roar · Post by **roar** » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:00 am

SuperStar Beams wrote:Sinclair was good for us and moving to him to the backline was the best choice for him. He is best 22 for us even with Williams. I would imagine our back line looking like this
FB: Sinclair Brown Toovey
HB: Williams Keefe Reid/Young/Seedsman

4 of your back 6 have poor to average disposal, which isn't good enough, IMO.

King Malta · Post by **King Malta** » Wed Mar 19, 2014 3:33 pm

Always been a big fan of Sinkers and was impressed with him on Friday, busted his ass for the stripes and was one of the only players who could hold his head somewhat high on the night.

I also don't understand the flogging of his disposal, he was disposing of it at around 75% last season, nothing wrong with that.

jackcass · Post by **jackcass** » Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:08 pm

King Malta wrote:Always been a big fan of Sinkers and was impressed with him on Friday, busted his ass for the stripes and was one of the only players who could hold his head somewhat high on the night.

I also don't understand the flogging of his disposal, he was disposing of it at around 75% last season, nothing wrong with that.

Missed a couple of goals early in his career and some people just can't move on.

Post by **think positive** » Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:57 pm

jackcass wrote:
King Malta wrote:Always been a big fan of Sinkers and was impressed with him on Friday, busted his ass for the stripes and was one of the only players who could hold his head somewhat high on the night.

I also don't understand the flogging of his disposal, he was disposing of it at around 75% last season, nothing wrong with that.
Missed a couple of goals early in his career and some people just can't move on.

Yep yep yep yep yep yep
Glad his names not cloke

John Wren · Post by **John Wren** » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:20 am

MagpieBat wrote:He's best 22 so long as Marley is out, but ideally he's not in our best 30 players.

you are going to be stuck with watching him for a while. he is best 22. he reads the play well. he knows where the footy is, how to get the footy and to keep it moving forward. he will get better and better as his body continues to grow.

MagpieBat · Post by **MagpieBat** » Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:36 am

John Wren wrote:
MagpieBat wrote:He's best 22 so long as Marley is out, but ideally he's not in our best 30 players.
you are going to be stuck with watching him for a while. he is best 22. he reads the play well. he knows where the footy is, how to get the footy and to keep it moving forward. he will get better and better as his body continues to grow.

So long as Buckley is coach, yeah he is, particularly with Marley absent.

But I stand by my contention that he is not a best 22 player with everyone available.

HAL · Post by **HAL** » Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:40 am

Is that what you think?

MagpieBat · Post by **MagpieBat** » Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:51 am

roar wrote:
SuperStar Beams wrote:Sinclair was good for us and moving to him to the backline was the best choice for him. He is best 22 for us even with Williams. I would imagine our back line looking like this
FB: Sinclair Brown Toovey
HB: Williams Keefe Reid/Young/Seedsman
4 of your back 6 have poor to average disposal, which isn't good enough, IMO.

This.

Particularly given the brand of football Buckley wants us to play.

Ideally you'd have Sinclair out of there for another defensive small with better kicking prowess (maybe Ramsay or Broomhead). Or perhaps for a Scharenberg and have Toovey play smaller. You'd definitely have Reid there, especially as a spare man, which would require us to abandon this notion of sending the +1 to the contest.

That way, you would have 3 or 4 reliable outlets by foot (Keeffe, Seedsman, Reid, Scharenberg/Ramsay/Broomhead). A wingman like Young dropping back makes it as many as 5.

John Wren · Post by **John Wren** » Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:22 am

SuperStar Beams wrote:Sinclair was good for us and moving to him to the backline was the best choice for him. He is best 22 for us even with Williams. I would imagine our back line looking like this
FB: Sinclair Brown Toovey
HB: Williams Keefe Reid/Young/Seedsman

While Williams cant play it will be Young/Seedsman/Reid and Maxwell in those final 2 spots

i'd be running young/seedsman off the half back flank or wing. fasolo to move back forward eventually.

the back half would consist of sinclair, brown, williams, toovey, keeffe, young, seedsman and harryl plus a midfielder or two for cover.

djjim · Post by **djjim** » Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:21 pm

Lolvu guys must all be brain dead sinclear is the biggest dud playing afl the most basic skill is 2 kick and he cant if use think he is our future thats why we got smashed rd 1 and many more 2 come big discrase wearing the black and white

HAL · Post by **HAL** » Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:24 pm

Or what?

Breadcrawl · Post by **Breadcrawl** » Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:31 pm

One of the reasons we will suddenly turn into a seriously good football team as the year progresses and he starts to realise that he is a fair dinkum AFL player

John Wren · Post by **John Wren** » Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:34 pm

djjim wrote:Lolvu guys must all be brain dead sinclear is the biggest dud playing afl the most basic skill is 2 kick and he cant if use think he is our future thats why we got smashed rd 1 and many more 2 come big discrase wearing the black and white

come back when you have learned to write english. this appears to be on a par of where you rate sinclair.

Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:36 pm

I agree with Sonic Animation, re djays

Post by **think positive** » Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:20 pm

djjim wrote:Lolvu guys must all be brain dead sinclear is the biggest dud playing afl the most basic skill is 2 kick and he cant if use think he is our future thats why we got smashed rd 1 and many more 2 come big discrase wearing the black and white

Wholly f&ck, I thought I was drinking early

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

#28 Ben Sinclair