This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Should also mention Langdon's game. I thought he handled the pressure very well. Beat his man on numerous occasions and 22 disposals with 86% efficiency is quality stuff from any player.
Totally agree - I thought from last week he (Langdon) was starting to look tired and might be about to be dropped - he stepped up and played his best game in the black and white.
His pace is fantastic... just so good to have those burners down back!
Last edited by yin-YANG on Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Love us or Hate us... we are Collingwood - you can't ignore the Mighty Magpies!!!
Gotta say I felt a little ill at quarter time, and I was in shock at half time. Brilliant comeback by the boys. Restricting an attacking team like the Bummers to 3 goals in 3 qtrs of footy is the stuff that premiership teams are built on
AN_Inkling wrote:^^He also had 9 tackles (I'm defending Beams? There's a first ). Maybe Heppell was his direct opponent, but players are not always instructed to play close. We may have been getting more from Beams the other way.
in the pre game thread someone mentioned Macca should go on Heppell
for the first tagging role. he didn't have much of it in the first 3/4s but
could have been a different story in the last if they got a role on.
keep it in the vault for next time Pies for i though it was the only concern
in a brilliantly coached match.
Keeffe will be a hard done by if dropped in the near future. he's set up
and composure down there is reassuring. sold a beauty to Merritt i think.
well done.
can't say there will be anyone dropped unless of injuries of course.
GreekLunatic wrote:i apologise for saying it was game over in the first quarter . Great we fought back and won. Lets move onto the blooze next week
No need to apologize, GreekLunatic. Most sane people thought we were gone too. At 40-3, I called it an abortion to trump all abortions. We were playing like sh!t at the time, and you called it as you saw it. Nothing wrong with that.
AN_Inkling wrote:^^He also had 9 tackles (I'm defending Beams? There's a first ). Maybe Heppell was his direct opponent, but players are not always instructed to play close. We may have been getting more from Beams the other way.
in the pre game thread someone mentioned Macca should go on Heppell
for the first tagging role. he didn't have much of it in the first 3/4s but
could have been a different story in the last if they got a role on.
keep it in the vault for next time Pies for i though it was the only concern
in a brilliantly coached match.
Heppell had 19 disposals till half time and was allowed to much latitude all day.