Pre match. Magpies v. Demons - all comments please

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
5150
Posts: 8059
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:36 pm

Post by 5150 »

FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote:In: Swan, Grundy, Dwyer, Ball
Out: Maxwell, Witts (rest), Blair, Sidey
+1 I had these as my selection changes then decided I'd look through other suggestions and found Frankie has nailed it.

If White is unavailable, I'd play Witts and sub him (perfect scenario would be early in the 3rd quarter) and play Kennedy.
User avatar
melliot
Posts: 5179
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by melliot »

This will be Dawes first game against us I believe.
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
Has liked: 1 time

Post by woftam »

melliot wrote:This will be Dawes first game against us I believe.
2nd - Played last against us last year.
User avatar
melliot
Posts: 5179
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by melliot »

Wasn't he injured??
User avatar
yin-YANG
Posts: 2292
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:13 pm

Post by yin-YANG »

yin-YANG wrote:I think Grundy was rested and so was Swan and probably Ball with only minor niggles... All to come back. I would have a go with the one ruck given the extra run generated and WHite having his best game playing more in the ruck! Adams disposal really let him down.

Out: Sidey, Maxy, Adams, Witts
In: Swan, Dwyer, Ball, Grundy

I would have had PK in this week if he didn't cop a hammy!

Quite a few changes but we don't lose too much except for Maxy's strong leadership down back!
I prefer this... although Frankie did Ok also! :shock:
Love us or Hate us... we are Collingwood - you can't ignore the Mighty Magpies!!!
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

^^Agree. If Ball's back, Adams is out, unless one of them is the sub.

Dwyer or Kennedy also a chance if Goldsack is moved back to cover for the loss of Maxwell.
Well done boys!
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

That is a hypothetical question.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

5150 wrote:
FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote:In: Swan, Grundy, Dwyer, Ball
Out: Maxwell, Witts (rest), Blair, Sidey
+1 I had these as my selection changes then decided I'd look through other suggestions and found Frankie has nailed it.

If White is unavailable, I'd play Witts and sub him (perfect scenario would be early in the 3rd quarter) and play Kennedy.
If White is out you'd play Witts with the plan to sub him early in the 3rd? Really? You think we should leave Cloke as our only tall forward and Grundy unsupported in the ruck against Jamar and Gawn? Really?
User avatar
collie dog
Posts: 1348
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Shelby Christmas dog

Post by collie dog »

FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote:oh my, we must be the only club that has a danger game every week. Are we the Austin Powers of the AFL?
We are! :lol:

But seriously, every week other teams get up for us. That's the problem.
Rain or hail, I wag my tail
User avatar
stoliboy
Posts: 4979
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 57 times

Post by stoliboy »

woftam wrote:
melliot wrote:This will be Dawes first game against us I believe.
2nd - Played last against us last year.
Dawes's stats from the Pies vs Melbourne game last year... 0 goals, 1 behind, 4 disposals, 4 kicks, 3 marks, 1 tackle.

Dawes is playing better this year though.
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
5150
Posts: 8059
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:36 pm

Post by 5150 »

jackcass wrote:
5150 wrote:
FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote:In: Swan, Grundy, Dwyer, Ball
Out: Maxwell, Witts (rest), Blair, Sidey
+1 I had these as my selection changes then decided I'd look through other suggestions and found Frankie has nailed it.

If White is unavailable, I'd play Witts and sub him (perfect scenario would be early in the 3rd quarter) and play Kennedy.
If White is out you'd play Witts with the plan to sub him early in the 3rd? Really? You think we should leave Cloke as our only tall forward and Grundy unsupported in the ruck against Jamar and Gawn? Really?
We should be well up by then. :wink:
User avatar
Neil Appleby
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 1998 11:10 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Neil Appleby »

Really don't understand this irrational desire to play Kennedy and Martin at the expense of Blair and Adams. Blair stays without doubt. Adams gets another gig on the back of his hard work against St Schoolgirl. He butchered it by foot sure, but he is clean by hand and that after all is his stock in trade; great inside, hard over the ball and very brave. Adams needs to get a few consecutive games and if he then still can't exhibit some composure then OK, give Kennedy or Dwyer his spot, but Martin is a long way behind in my opinion.
Out: Sidebottom, Maxwell & White (inj)
In: Ball, Swan, Grundy
After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing!
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

swoop42 wrote:I'd look at resting O'Brien for a week and give Broomhead a run.
Who does he play for??? :roll:
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34885
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

^^^ I think he means the guy with the scary hair-cut wearing H's number. I didn't recognise him in the pre-game warm-up, either.
Joel
Posts: 21161
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 1999 8:01 pm
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Joel »

Piesnchess wrote:Im still patiently waiting for Kyle Martin to get a game. Now im getting a trifle impatient. !!
Not sure if someone has answered this already.

He is a rookie listed player. He would need to be upgraded to get a game. This may happen so due to the Round 11 rule which allows the upgrade of a rookie without an LTI.

We haven't been able to upgrade him because IIRC, it would have forced Frost out (he is also a rookie listed player).
Post Reply