Pre match. Magpies v. Demons - all comments please

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

How far up?
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

In: Ball, Swan, Dwyer
Out: Sidebottom, Maxwell, Adams

Adams the obvious omission with Ball back. Ball, Swan, Dwyer all good ins.

A good call to go with one ruck, will be a good chance to see how White goes as backup. Interesting though that the one ruck is Witts. Has he gone past Grundy, or are we just giving him an opportunity?
Well done boys!
User avatar
Doc63
Posts: 4558
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Newport

Post by Doc63 »

AN_Inkling wrote:In: Ball, Swan, Dwyer
Out: Sidebottom, Maxwell, Adams

Adams the obvious omission with Ball back. Ball, Swan, Dwyer all good ins.

A good call to go with one ruck, will be a good chance to see how White goes as backup. Interesting though that the one ruck is Witts. Has he gone past Grundy, or are we just giving him an opportunity?
Maybe Grundy's back is a bit worse than we have been led to believe.
I hold a cup of wisdom, but there is nothing within.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

I am Da Man
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Still half a season to go plus finals so I think we're just easing the load on Grundy now with the side benefit of giving Witts more opportunity as our main ruck option.

As far as actual tap work to advantage goes it's pretty even between Grundy and Witts with Witts if anything slightly in front.

Grundy gets the nod in terms of work around the ground and second efforts at ruck contests while Witts has shown a little more as a forward IMO though neither have shown enough at present in that role to warrant us going with a two ruck setup.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

Post by Mugwump »

HAL wrote:How far up?
Bit of a personal question, that, Hal....
Two more flags before I die!
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

How far up?
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

Wingard just took mark of the year to date, Jamie better lift his game. :)

Check out this puppy. http://www.snappytv.com/snaps/the-chad- ... y_oo/32203
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Elliott's was better.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

Post by Mugwump »

swoop42 wrote:Still half a season to go plus finals so I think we're just easing the load on Grundy now with the side benefit of giving Witts more opportunity as our main ruck option.

As far as actual tap work to advantage goes it's pretty even between Grundy and Witts with Witts if anything slightly in front.

Grundy gets the nod in terms of work around the ground and second efforts at ruck contests while Witts has shown a little more as a forward IMO though neither have shown enough at present in that role to warrant us going with a two ruck setup.
At this stage it seems to me that Witts is a better ruckman. Grundy gives away too many frees, often in front of goal, and Witts seems to me a better tap ruckman. Neither are great at taking overhead marks, and both are ok at ground level - though Grundy may have the edge there, one or two extra clearances do not make up for the other things that give big Jarrod the edge. I hope there is a place for both, as both are exciting prospects as they mature. Maturity may also make one far better than the other, of course. I recall a time, ca 2010, when I thought Sidebottom was a coming megastar star and Beams a good player. Now both are excellent, but Beams is slightly superior... Time will tell.
Two more flags before I die!
perthmagpie
Posts: 4373
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 10:11 am
Location: Yarrawonga

Post by perthmagpie »

If Frawley plays forward who will play on Cloke? Chalet or Christian Slalom?
Magpies love pies(Lol)
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
Has liked: 1 time

Post by woftam »

I think Grundy is the better tap ruckman of the two. Witts has very little leap & centre bounces & still gets pushed around a bit. Needs a few more KG's on him. Other than that there is not much between them.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

woftam wrote:I think Grundy is the better tap ruckman of the two. Witts has very little leap & centre bounces & still gets pushed around a bit. Needs a few more KG's on him. Other than that there is not much between them.
I think Grundy as a way bigger Upside then Witts.

As you say Witts hardly leaves the Ground and he is a bit of Slow Plodder around the Ground
I am Da Man
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Not sure who has the bigger future. Witts has better skills and is a giant, but Grundy goes in hard and is more mobile. Will be interesting to see.
Well done boys!
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

I am Da Man
Post Reply