Collingwood misses out on Frawley

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Great outcome. He's an average player. Dangerfield and Cameron next year, please.
Siceman
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:19 pm

Post by Siceman »

Hawthorn and Geelong are after him.

Where did they finish this year? and the last 2-3 years where have they been?

The fact these 2 teams are after him tell me that he is worth pursuing.

A bit like the Dogs drafting Bontempelli because we were keen.. with our recent drafting record..
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34870
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 178 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

No. Different stages of development. They have senior players at the precipice and, in each case, defensive holes that may need plugging next season in order to load up for another top 4 finish. Eg, Lake at Hawthorn seems to be struggling, injury-wise. When their current crop of stars go (and Mitchell and Hodge haven't got too many more seasons in the tank), they will likely be out of premiership contention for some years, so it makes sense for them to go for the best available players, now, irrespective of the long-term consequences. Not so for us.
User avatar
Holbrook Bloke
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:23 pm
Location: Sydney, but Holbrook beckons

Post by Holbrook Bloke »

I'd be happy if we seriously looked at Daniel Merritt - hard, tough defender who will help our our young backline.
Jonno
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club (Est 2003)

Camelia Grove Hotel - The best AFL pub in Sydney all season, not just the finals.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Only a few journos ever had us in the mix for Frawley but the majority never did.

He'll be a good pick up for Hawthorn or Geelong and would have been handy one for us with our young back line.

While the hawks and cats might have more aging stars than us, with free agency now available to them don't you think they'll be able to adequately replace most of them with the salary cap space that will be freed up?

I'm not as convinced as some that we'll see Geelong and Hawthorn tumble out of the eight anytime soon.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

BBHS wrote:How can you miss out on someone your not chasing?
Yep!
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

collie dog wrote:^ And you believe that tripe? We never get champions at Collingwood. Either we fund player's retirement or they are finished as decent players. Fact.

But no one has answered the question about how Geelong or Hawthorn can AFFORD Frawley.
Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

Breadcrawl wrote:If we were signing him you'd be questioning his worth and insisting that we were overpaying and crippling ourselves like you are now claiming we did with Cloke.

None of your dodgy tactics will work here, regardless of the account you happen to be using at the time, ever again.

Give up and go away
Wow breadcrawl you are the master club stooge.
The grand honcho! !!
Why dont you answer the criticism instead of mouthing off your usual
personal stupid rubbish.
Remember the annual stooge camp is coming soon.
Get in early!
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

piester wrote:Frawley is not a genuine star and not worth anything near $800K. A good ordinary player at best and we are better biding our time and going for a really big fish not an over rated guppy. Might not be some one this year, but maybe next.
Agree. Rather spend less than half the money Frawley is asking for to retain the Sack. At least you know he loves the club and gives it everything every week.
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

jackcass wrote:
collie dog wrote:^ And you believe that tripe? We never get champions at Collingwood. Either we fund player's retirement or they are finished as decent players. Fact.

But no one has answered the question about how Geelong or Hawthorn can AFFORD Frawley.
Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.
And that is why they thrash us in the winning stakes!
Because we refuse to learn.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

thompsoc wrote:
jackcass wrote:
collie dog wrote:^ And you believe that tripe? We never get champions at Collingwood. Either we fund player's retirement or they are finished as decent players. Fact.

But no one has answered the question about how Geelong or Hawthorn can AFFORD Frawley.
Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.
And that is why they thrash us in the winning stakes!
Because we refuse to learn.
They thrash us because a few posters on a forum don't give a fluck about them.... yeah right!
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

jackcass wrote:
thompsoc wrote:
jackcass wrote: Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.
And that is why they thrash us in the winning stakes!
Because we refuse to learn.
They thrash us because a few posters on a forum don't give a fluck about them.... yeah right!
Then stop posting
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
Breadcrawl
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm

Post by Breadcrawl »

thompsoc wrote:
Breadcrawl wrote:If we were signing him you'd be questioning his worth and insisting that we were overpaying and crippling ourselves like you are now claiming we did with Cloke.

None of your dodgy tactics will work here, regardless of the account you happen to be using at the time, ever again.

Give up and go away
Wow breadcrawl you are the master club stooge.
The grand honcho! !!
Why dont you answer the criticism instead of mouthing off your usual
personal stupid rubbish.
Remember the annual stooge camp is coming soon.
Get in early!
Trolls getting in behind trolls.

I don't answer criticism that is just for the sake of criticism. And that is all the dog does. Been that way for years.

Didn't realise the dog had a bitch. Figures though
they can smell what we're cookin'
User avatar
derkd
Posts: 2887
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 33 times

Post by derkd »

The equasion in my mind ( and i know i am far from a expert) but only elite players in the comp should be asking +700k a year. Frawley far from that class.
"To know nothing of events before your birth, is to forever remain a child" - Cicero (Roman Lawyer/Senator) 46 BCE.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

Breadcrawl wrote:
thompsoc wrote:
Breadcrawl wrote:If we were signing him you'd be questioning his worth and insisting that we were overpaying and crippling ourselves like you are now claiming we did with Cloke.

None of your dodgy tactics will work here, regardless of the account you happen to be using at the time, ever again.

Give up and go away
Wow breadcrawl you are the master club stooge.
The grand honcho! !!
Why dont you answer the criticism instead of mouthing off your usual
personal stupid rubbish.
Remember the annual stooge camp is coming soon.
Get in early!
Trolls getting in behind trolls.

I don't answer criticism that is just for the sake of criticism. And that is all the dog does. Been that way for years.

Didn't realise the dog had a bitch. Figures though
death by a thousand cuts. these types of posters are diminishing their relevancy with every post they make.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Post Reply