Collingwood misses out on Frawley
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:19 pm
No. Different stages of development. They have senior players at the precipice and, in each case, defensive holes that may need plugging next season in order to load up for another top 4 finish. Eg, Lake at Hawthorn seems to be struggling, injury-wise. When their current crop of stars go (and Mitchell and Hodge haven't got too many more seasons in the tank), they will likely be out of premiership contention for some years, so it makes sense for them to go for the best available players, now, irrespective of the long-term consequences. Not so for us.
- Holbrook Bloke
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, but Holbrook beckons
Only a few journos ever had us in the mix for Frawley but the majority never did.
He'll be a good pick up for Hawthorn or Geelong and would have been handy one for us with our young back line.
While the hawks and cats might have more aging stars than us, with free agency now available to them don't you think they'll be able to adequately replace most of them with the salary cap space that will be freed up?
I'm not as convinced as some that we'll see Geelong and Hawthorn tumble out of the eight anytime soon.
He'll be a good pick up for Hawthorn or Geelong and would have been handy one for us with our young back line.
While the hawks and cats might have more aging stars than us, with free agency now available to them don't you think they'll be able to adequately replace most of them with the salary cap space that will be freed up?
I'm not as convinced as some that we'll see Geelong and Hawthorn tumble out of the eight anytime soon.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
- jackcass
- Posts: 12529
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.collie dog wrote:^ And you believe that tripe? We never get champions at Collingwood. Either we fund player's retirement or they are finished as decent players. Fact.
But no one has answered the question about how Geelong or Hawthorn can AFFORD Frawley.
- thompsoc
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm
Wow breadcrawl you are the master club stooge.Breadcrawl wrote:If we were signing him you'd be questioning his worth and insisting that we were overpaying and crippling ourselves like you are now claiming we did with Cloke.
None of your dodgy tactics will work here, regardless of the account you happen to be using at the time, ever again.
Give up and go away
The grand honcho! !!
Why dont you answer the criticism instead of mouthing off your usual
personal stupid rubbish.
Remember the annual stooge camp is coming soon.
Get in early!
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
- jackcass
- Posts: 12529
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Agree. Rather spend less than half the money Frawley is asking for to retain the Sack. At least you know he loves the club and gives it everything every week.piester wrote:Frawley is not a genuine star and not worth anything near $800K. A good ordinary player at best and we are better biding our time and going for a really big fish not an over rated guppy. Might not be some one this year, but maybe next.
- thompsoc
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm
And that is why they thrash us in the winning stakes!jackcass wrote:Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.collie dog wrote:^ And you believe that tripe? We never get champions at Collingwood. Either we fund player's retirement or they are finished as decent players. Fact.
But no one has answered the question about how Geelong or Hawthorn can AFFORD Frawley.
Because we refuse to learn.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
- jackcass
- Posts: 12529
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Bendigo
They thrash us because a few posters on a forum don't give a fluck about them.... yeah right!thompsoc wrote:And that is why they thrash us in the winning stakes!jackcass wrote:Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.collie dog wrote:^ And you believe that tripe? We never get champions at Collingwood. Either we fund player's retirement or they are finished as decent players. Fact.
But no one has answered the question about how Geelong or Hawthorn can AFFORD Frawley.
Because we refuse to learn.
- thompsoc
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm
Then stop postingjackcass wrote:They thrash us because a few posters on a forum don't give a fluck about them.... yeah right!thompsoc wrote:And that is why they thrash us in the winning stakes!jackcass wrote: Mainly because we don't give a fluck about Geelong or Hawthorn.
Because we refuse to learn.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
- Breadcrawl
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm
Trolls getting in behind trolls.thompsoc wrote:Wow breadcrawl you are the master club stooge.Breadcrawl wrote:If we were signing him you'd be questioning his worth and insisting that we were overpaying and crippling ourselves like you are now claiming we did with Cloke.
None of your dodgy tactics will work here, regardless of the account you happen to be using at the time, ever again.
Give up and go away
The grand honcho! !!
Why dont you answer the criticism instead of mouthing off your usual
personal stupid rubbish.
Remember the annual stooge camp is coming soon.
Get in early!
I don't answer criticism that is just for the sake of criticism. And that is all the dog does. Been that way for years.
Didn't realise the dog had a bitch. Figures though
they can smell what we're cookin'
- John Wren
- Posts: 24186
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm
death by a thousand cuts. these types of posters are diminishing their relevancy with every post they make.Breadcrawl wrote:Trolls getting in behind trolls.thompsoc wrote:Wow breadcrawl you are the master club stooge.Breadcrawl wrote:If we were signing him you'd be questioning his worth and insisting that we were overpaying and crippling ourselves like you are now claiming we did with Cloke.
None of your dodgy tactics will work here, regardless of the account you happen to be using at the time, ever again.
Give up and go away
The grand honcho! !!
Why dont you answer the criticism instead of mouthing off your usual
personal stupid rubbish.
Remember the annual stooge camp is coming soon.
Get in early!
I don't answer criticism that is just for the sake of criticism. And that is all the dog does. Been that way for years.
Didn't realise the dog had a bitch. Figures though
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.