What do you like about It's art?Breadcrawl wrote:It's art.
When it comes to art, I don't know much but I know what I like.
And I like it.
It's classy
Collingwood misses out on Frawley
Moderator: bbmods
- mudlark
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:01 pm
- Location: Maroochydore Qld
- Contact:
Re: Collingwood misses out on Frawley
[quote="collie dog"]How on earth can Geelong or Hawthorn be favoured to have signed James Frawley?
Obviously we've missed out if media reports are on the mark.""
This is your question.We missed no point.
Obviously we've missed out if media reports are on the mark.""
This is your question.We missed no point.
- thompsoc
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm
Oh Gee Breadcrawl I didn't know f....king goats wasBreadcrawl wrote:It's art.
When it comes to art, I don't know much but I know what I like.
And I like it.
It's classy
on the curriculum at stooge camp!
Has this been passed by Ed of Broadmeadows?
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
- Breadcrawl
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/ ... useum.html
Turns out you have to be cultured and also have a sense of humour to not find it offensive.
So I get why we have a problem here
Turns out you have to be cultured and also have a sense of humour to not find it offensive.
So I get why we have a problem here
they can smell what we're cookin'
- thompsoc
- Posts: 6357
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm
The problem breadcrawl is you and your kind take us
"perceptive fellow" too seriously.
Lighten up and take criticism with a pinch of salt.
It is all part of the great tapestry of life.
Accept criticism and we will accept you.
Simple really.
Otherwise it is back to stooge camp for you.
"perceptive fellow" too seriously.
Lighten up and take criticism with a pinch of salt.
It is all part of the great tapestry of life.
Accept criticism and we will accept you.
Simple really.
Otherwise it is back to stooge camp for you.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
- Breadcrawl
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm
Did you think I was being serious?
Oh.
That's embarrassing.
Sorry.
P.S. I have no 'kind'. I have my opinion and others have theirs. Sometimes our opinions align and there are some posters who I might find myself agreeing with more often than not, but there's no one I always agree with. There isn't even anyone I always disagree with, though that is a closer call. It is interesting that most of the less optimistic want to make a diametric argument out of it.
Just then, I was being serious
Oh.
That's embarrassing.
Sorry.
P.S. I have no 'kind'. I have my opinion and others have theirs. Sometimes our opinions align and there are some posters who I might find myself agreeing with more often than not, but there's no one I always agree with. There isn't even anyone I always disagree with, though that is a closer call. It is interesting that most of the less optimistic want to make a diametric argument out of it.
Just then, I was being serious
they can smell what we're cookin'
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:12 pm
why bother?
even if you accepted that frawley was a star (which i dont), and even if he was worth big bucks (which he isnt), why would you get him in the middle of a rebuild - it doesnt align to our strategy or timeframe. Or do people have such short memories that they expect us to be Top 4 next year?
We wont make finals until 2016 at earliest , so getting frawley wouldnt make sense for him or us
We wont make finals until 2016 at earliest , so getting frawley wouldnt make sense for him or us
S'pose you fancy Tristarc at eights?
- The Boy Who Cried Wolf
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:24 am
- Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
Re: why bother?
So you're expecting us to play as bad, or worse next year then? even without the injuries (it couldn't be possible to have it like it's been 4 years in a row... could it??)??dunkers66 wrote:even if you accepted that frawley was a star (which i dont), and even if he was worth big bucks (which he isnt), why would you get him in the middle of a rebuild - it doesnt align to our strategy or timeframe. Or do people have such short memories that they expect us to be Top 4 next year?
We wont make finals until 2016 at earliest , so getting frawley wouldnt make sense for him or us
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
- Flashman
- Posts: 2019
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:03 pm
Bare in mind you are dealing with a poster who found himself getting irate and personal with HAL, that's even after being told that HAL was a spambot.Breadcrawl wrote:Did you think I was being serious?
Oh.
That's embarrassing.
Sorry.
P.S. I have no 'kind'. I have my opinion and others have theirs. Sometimes our opinions align and there are some posters who I might find myself agreeing with more often than not, but there's no one I always agree with. There isn't even anyone I always disagree with, though that is a closer call. It is interesting that most of the less optimistic want to make a diametric argument out of it.
Just then, I was being serious
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:12 pm
Re: why bother?
*********The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:So you're expecting us to play as bad, or worse next year then? even without the injuries (it couldn't be possible to have it like it's been 4 years in a row... could it??)??dunkers66 wrote:even if you accepted that frawley was a star (which i dont), and even if he was worth big bucks (which he isnt), why would you get him in the middle of a rebuild - it doesnt align to our strategy or timeframe. Or do people have such short memories that they expect us to be Top 4 next year?
We wont make finals until 2016 at earliest , so getting frawley wouldnt make sense for him or us
(apologies for poor formatting of reply)
gut feel is we wont play finals next year. can't see more than 1 team dropping out and i think suns, eagles and crows all better placed than us. also i dont believe injuries cost us the brisbane or west coast or hawks games, or the bulldogs and so on. also predict blues will break their recent duck against us
S'pose you fancy Tristarc at eights?
Oops. Too much data.Flashman wrote:Bare in mind you are dealing with a poster who found himself getting irate and personal with HAL, that's even after being told that HAL was a spambot.Breadcrawl wrote:Did you think I was being serious?
Oh.
That's embarrassing.
Sorry.
P.S. I have no 'kind'. I have my opinion and others have theirs. Sometimes our opinions align and there are some posters who I might find myself agreeing with more often than not, but there's no one I always agree with. There isn't even anyone I always disagree with, though that is a closer call. It is interesting that most of the less optimistic want to make a diametric argument out of it.
Just then, I was being serious
- yin-YANG
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:13 pm
Reported that Frawley wants to go to Hawthorn, now and that a free agency offer will be made. This is probably good for Collingwood, not least because the Hawks had reportedly dropped out over salary cap constraints, so - putting 2 and 2 together - it probably means the salary on offer is less likely to justify pick 3 compensation. That might also, of course, affect Melbourne's decision about whether to match the offer etc.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-10-02/f ... -for-hawks
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-10-02/f ... -for-hawks
Well, it's an interesting question but I don't think we have anywhere near enough data to answer it, or even to speculate intelligently. It depends not only on their present position but the salary cap movement for next year and the various contract positions/retirements at Hawthorn etc over the next 12 months.