Brad Sewell?

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
WhyPhilWhy?
Posts: 9507
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Location: Location:
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 23 times

Brad Sewell?

Post by WhyPhilWhy? »

An experienced, hard body for a couple of years?

Given he's not in Hawthorn's best 22...
User avatar
Deja Vu
Posts: 4411
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am

Post by Deja Vu »

Really rate him but no
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34676
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 85 times

Re: Brad Sewell?

Post by Pies4shaw »

WhyPhilWhy? wrote:An experienced, hard body for a couple of years?

Given he's not in Hawthorn's best 22...
You can't makes Lukey Ball retire and then bring this old hack in.
Pies2016
Posts: 6749
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 87 times

Post by Pies2016 »

Not to be a smart a**^ but he clearly wasnt in hawks best 22.
Been a great warrior for them but bringing him in would certainly worry me.
As kenny rogers said " you gots to know when to fold em ".
Malcheski or nothing.
Gary Player β€œ the harder I practice, the luckier I get β€œ
Pies2016
Posts: 6749
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 87 times

Post by Pies2016 »

My mistake, thought the post said he was in best 22.
My apologies.
Gary Player β€œ the harder I practice, the luckier I get β€œ
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13355
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
Has liked: 281 times
Been liked: 66 times

Re: Brad Sewell?

Post by piedys »

WhyPhilWhy? wrote:An experienced, hard body for a couple of years?

Given he's not in Hawthorn's best 22...
Phil i asked this question in another trade thread, prior to the Beams bombshell, and got pissed on:

TRADE WEEK PREDICTIONS

http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopi ... ght=sewell
piedys wrote:Anybody open to Sewell, for a very late pick?
Looks like his race might be run at Hawthorn by as early as thursday.
Would be a one-season contract, effectively replacing Ball for extraction, and to take the hits in the centre, as his leg speed is seemingly lost too.
Short term band aid selection only, until we get this Adams and Thomas situation nutted out by 2016.

Dyso
Stupied wrote:No thanks. Why would we get rid of Ball, only to recruit an inferior version of him who's the same age?
RudeBoy wrote: Adams is a better player than Ball. Sewell is inferior to both.
Piesnchess is on board for this too:
Az wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:Look, next year our Baby Pies are gonna be so young, some of us may have to go on Nanny duties down at the Club. ! What we really need, IMHO, is to recruit 2 senior guys, too help guide the young fledglings Pies. Now, if brad sewell misses out on the GF this week, hed be one id definitely want on, say, a 2 year deal, hed take over from Ball. We really need some experienced guys now, what wiith Beams leaving too, we will be the Leagues youngest Creche. !
What a magnificent spit in the face to Bally that would be. Thanks Luke, but you're too old and you'll be playing a lot of VFL next year. Oh by the way, we'll be picking up your 30 year old mate Sewell who is also a slow paced insider with dodgy calfs and hamstrings.
Dyso
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
bwphantom
Posts: 4375
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 7:01 pm
Location: Brisbane QLD
Contact:

Post by bwphantom »

He wants to get away from the cooold melbourne winters...Gold Coast bound.
All this may be summed up in one word - CHARACTER - and if that is not worth developing, nothing is.

Jock McHale
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

could be worse ways to use pick 79 in the upcoming draft!!!
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29176
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 128 times
Been liked: 191 times

Post by Jezza »

Great player but he wouldn't be a part of our long-term future plans. If we got him for literally nothing and he led by example for a year or two with our young list I'd consider it.

Sewell is out of contract at the end of next year by the way so it's not likely we'll pursue him.
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13355
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
Has liked: 281 times
Been liked: 66 times

Post by piedys »

bwphantom wrote:He wants to get away from the cooold melbourne winters...Gold Coast bound.
Then he'd be rather optimistic to think he'd crack their best 22, before ours...
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22074
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:08 pm
Been liked: 73 times

Post by RudeBoy »

No way
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19521
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 163 times
Been liked: 59 times

Post by Presti35 »

He is a perfect fit for GWS/Melb or even GC.

Like others have said, you dont drop Luke Ball and bring in Sewell.

I'd like to see him continue on next year. It'll be interesting to see if he goes to another club. Just hope its not Essendon.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
Big T
Posts: 10181
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am
Location: Torino, Italy
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 58 times

Post by Big T »

I think whatever the case it pays to bring people either on field or off field from the best club in the land, and that is Hawthorn.

Sewell in this case knows how they train, how they meet, how the eat, how they crap. That can be of great benefit.
Buon Giorno
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19521
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 163 times
Been liked: 59 times

Post by Presti35 »

^^

This is true. But that could also work in a development role.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
themonk
Posts: 2223
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 3:12 pm

Post by themonk »

Big T wrote:I think whatever the case it pays to bring people either on field or off field from the best club in the land, and that is Hawthorn.

Sewell in this case knows how they train, how they meet, how the eat, how they crap. That can be of great benefit.
Sewell is past it in terms of providing consistency over a complete season but this is not a bad idea.

Let's not forget we have Macaffer & Scharenberg on the long term injury list next year so we could fit him in for 1 year, he can help out with the development of our younger players a hopefully play 12-16 decent games.
Post Reply