The great big, consolidated Mitch Clark thread

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54830
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 161 times

Post by stui magpie »

Albert Parker wrote:
choppa wrote:Players seem to be choosing Geelong a fair bit over the last few years (who can blame them).

Didn't make logical sense to pick him up as much as I wanted him.

Would of meant picking up Lynch, White and Clark three years in a row....it's odd trying to get 3 CHF's over 3 years.
Taylor Adams didn't choose Geelong over Collingwood

One problem we may have is that we do not have many legendary players around the club from which to learn from either.

Pendles as captain is a jet, young mids may want to learn to be professional like him

Beams is off though, Harry is off, Ball and Maxy retired.

Go to the Cats and there are still the Enright's, Taylors, Selwoods etc to learn from and which have played in multiple premierships
Didn't Taylor Adams say that he chose Collingwood because of Buckley?
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Albert Parker
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:12 pm

Post by Albert Parker »

^Yes, he did. Under 16s coach
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership
User avatar
killer
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Ballarat

Post by killer »

Let's go hard at Frawley now in retaliation to Geelong stealing Mitch Clarke from under our noses.

We can't go into 2015 with the same foward Line
Andrew
Ballarat Victoria
"i'd kill for a nobel peace prize"

Car'n the PIES!!!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34875
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 130 times
Been liked: 181 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Collingwood shouldn't necessarily give up on this bloke, if they really want him. He's engaged in what appear to have been 3 backflips in reasonably quick succession and trade week hasn't even kicked off, so there's plenty of room for further ducking and weaving. Of course, there may be a question whether he could be trusted to commit to Collingwood for more than about 5 games.

Alternatively, they could take the view that he can be inexpensively (for us) parked for a year or two at the Pussiery until we need to prise him out for the next flag tilt- that obviously won't take much.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

killer wrote:Let's go hard at Frawley now in retaliation to Geelong stealing Mitch Clarke from under our noses.

We can't go into 2015 with the same foward Line
Illogical. List numbers are limited so why waste 1 on a player we don't need who'll chew up significant salary cap space.
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
Has liked: 1 time

Post by woftam »

jackcass wrote:
killer wrote:Let's go hard at Frawley now in retaliation to Geelong stealing Mitch Clarke from under our noses.

We can't go into 2015 with the same foward Line
Illogical. List numbers are limited so why waste 1 on a player we don't need who'll chew up significant salary cap space.
This x 100
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54830
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 161 times

Post by stui magpie »

Not unhappy to miss out on Clark, don't want Frawley.

Last year proved we were more than competitive if we had enough cattle on deck.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Post Reply