What would you prefer?

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply

I would take:

Patrick Dangerfield
9
69%
Christian Petracca
4
31%
 
Total votes: 13

User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19908
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 441 times
Been liked: 214 times

What would you prefer?

Post by Presti35 »

Not that either is likely to happen.

But if you had the chance to pull the trigger for only one of these players, (assuming it's a part of the Beams fiasco) which would you take?
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Dangerfield. Proven. And an immediate replacement. Would be an upgrade on Beams.
Well done boys!
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

I am Da Man
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54830
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 161 times

Post by stui magpie »

Dangerfield for the now. Proven player, fits our age profile having offloaded a **** of experience in recent years.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

the age old debate between actuality and potentiality.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
Rexy17
Posts: 595
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Ballarat

Post by Rexy17 »

Both
Petracca this year, Danger as a RFA next
B.U.M.S ROCK...That's Ballarat United Magpies Supporters.....Long trip but even longer hangovers!
Post Reply