King Malta wrote:CarringbushCigar wrote:King Malta wrote:
Do you think he's better than Beams?
.
Let's put it this way Id rather have Treloar on the list today than Beams.
Given that Id throw in Sinclair if it made it compelling to GWS.
I've made it no secret I have serious concerns over Sinclair
maybe 3rd round as well went too far
Treloar on the list brings genuine positivity and excitement to this football club.
I'd rather have him on the list, but that's now taking into account that it appears Beams is a bit of dick.
I obviously rate Sinclair higher than you so we're going to disagree, but to me he's not a throwaway player we should just include into a trade. He's one of the only lads we've got who possess genuine leg speed, he's also hard at it and he's disposal has been consistently on the up.
He would certainly bring genuine positivity, I agree, but I don't want us to to give more than we have to.
GWS - WILL NOT trade this bloke - he would be one of 3 untouchables if they could guarantee he'd stay and I think he would.
Treloar is the next best thing to Nate Fyfe.
He does it all - wins his own ball, runs and carries, spreads and is a fantastic overhead mark.
In fact at Fyfes age Treloar will be as good - could be better.
He has the potential to win a brownlow and while that might not mean much, he would be one of the few players I WOULD trade in a straight swap for Beams.
We would be better off with this deal. He is as tough, taller, faster, stronger and runs both ways. He is as good a kick at goal in play, and a better set-shot and overhead mark.