#17,#11 Dayne Beams

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Collingwood 4 eternity
Posts: 5271
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:00 am

Post by Collingwood 4 eternity »

didick wrote:So is it confirmed Beams was at a pub in Kew the night of the copeland or was it just a rumour?
Yes he was at the Harp in Kew
1990 Grand Final :
"From the back pocket, this will be probably the last kick, he need not even kick it, the drought is over. 32 years they've waited, let the celebrations begin" Sandy Roberts
Beast
Posts: 2899
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:05 pm

Post by Beast »

Collingwood 4 eternity wrote:
Lazza wrote:Levi Greenwood wants Collingwood.
Surely his nickname iff we get him should be Colin , just drop the Green
His nickname is actually Pig, as in always hungry.

Nice quiet bloke by the way.
User avatar
rocketronnie
Posts: 8821
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: Reservoir

Post by rocketronnie »

Neil Appleby wrote:Have to disagree with RR on the Beams trade worth. Nobody, other than Brisbane, thinks Collingwood is being greedy or asking for 'overs'. Buckley, Hine, Pert and now Eade have delivered a consistent message since the end of last week; that's when it became obvious that the sick father scenario wasn't the real story. Once Beams displayed a total lack of respect to his coaches and team mates, Collingwood started playing hard-ball. Pick 5 and a decent player is all they will contemplate, otherwise Beams can stay with us. Brisane needs to get the deal done to our satisfaction and they have three more days to do it. Does anybody really believe that Collingwood will allow itself to be bent-over on this trade? Brisbane does a deal or Beams finds a home at GC or sits out for a year.
...And then walks to Brisbane in 2015 for nothing when he is out of contract. Wonderful outcome. A triumph for Collingwood that will be. A first round draft pick seems to be what his market value is. I'd take it and be happy with that.
"Only the weak believe that what they do in battle is who they are as men" - Thomas Marshall - "Ironclad".
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
Has liked: 1 time

Post by woftam »

rocketronnie wrote:
Neil Appleby wrote:Have to disagree with RR on the Beams trade worth. Nobody, other than Brisbane, thinks Collingwood is being greedy or asking for 'overs'. Buckley, Hine, Pert and now Eade have delivered a consistent message since the end of last week; that's when it became obvious that the sick father scenario wasn't the real story. Once Beams displayed a total lack of respect to his coaches and team mates, Collingwood started playing hard-ball. Pick 5 and a decent player is all they will contemplate, otherwise Beams can stay with us. Brisane needs to get the deal done to our satisfaction and they have three more days to do it. Does anybody really believe that Collingwood will allow itself to be bent-over on this trade? Brisbane does a deal or Beams finds a home at GC or sits out for a year.
...And then walks to Brisbane in 2015 for nothing when he is out of contract. Wonderful outcome. A triumph for Collingwood that will be. A first round draft pick seems to be what his market value is. I'd take it and be happy with that.
You are easily please then.
Thank god you aren't doing our bidding. Everybody, even the media are saying pick 5 isn't enough.
User avatar
slydog81
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:16 am

Post by slydog81 »

Well he didnt turn up to the B n F so clearly something is up
We're always up to mischief!
Santo
Posts: 262
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:02 pm

Post by Santo »

I am more then happy to not do a trade at all then a lousy draft pick.

If Brisbane act like @&$!S and offer us nothing, I'm sure then if it becomes Collingwood or bust, and we don't blink we send him to GWS. If they act like @&$!S and only offer pick 4 then so be it, they weren't the ones who went behind our backs and approached a contracted player.

If the worst of the worst comes to the worst we retain Beams. We tell him to take a leave, all paid for, to be with his sick dad up until January, then we see what the options are from there. I'm guessing it will be a Mitch Clark situation, in which case we render his contract, leaving more room in the salary cap he sits out a year costing him massive dollars.

In any case, if Bris screw us over he will end up in GWS, he just won't be safe playing in Seaford or playing anywhere else in Melbourne after his disgraceful behaviour.

Sorry was meant fort his thread.
Santo
Posts: 262
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:02 pm

Post by Santo »

One thing Beams has proved is that he is a <snip>, and this would you think bring down his trade currency, a lot of clubs will probably not want such a person playing for their club, he's as toxic as Akermanis, it's just he's a different more introverted person.

He has screwed over all his mates that he had at Collingwood.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Santo wrote:One thing Beams has proved is that he is a <snip>, and this would you think bring down his trade currency, a lot of clubs will probably not want such a person playing for their club, he's as toxic as Akermanis, it's just he's a different more introverted person.

He has screwed over all his mates that he had at Collingwood.
Seriously!
Wilko
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:41 pm

Post by Wilko »

I agree only met Beams once and it wasn't a happy experience
I'll I'll cut him some slack anyway as he is the footballer first and foremost
Probably a good bloke to sit down and have a beer with..who knows but all pies supporters are now starting to get that feeling of been screwed with.
I've seen the good times and the bad and now is the perfect time for Collingwood to make a stand
As of 5pm Friday all deals are off with Brisbane immediate and forseeable
F&@k em !
Wilkinson
User avatar
themonk
Posts: 2225
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:12 pm

Post by themonk »

jackcass wrote:
Santo wrote:One thing Beams has proved is that he is a <snip>, and this would you think bring down his trade currency, a lot of clubs will probably not want such a person playing for their club, he's as toxic as Akermanis, it's just he's a different more introverted person.

He has screwed over all his mates that he had at Collingwood.
Seriously!
:lol: :lol:

Every club would jump at the chance to get Beams
Aker at 24 was a gem, we would have won 2 flags with him in the side
No true mate would stand in the way of seeing a friend make more money

Get a grip
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

themonk wrote:
jackcass wrote:
Santo wrote:One thing Beams has proved is that he is a <snip>, and this would you think bring down his trade currency, a lot of clubs will probably not want such a person playing for their club, he's as toxic as Akermanis, it's just he's a different more introverted person.

He has screwed over all his mates that he had at Collingwood.
Seriously!
:lol: :lol:

Every club would jump at the chance to get Beams
Aker at 24 was a gem, we would have won 2 flags with him in the side
No true mate would stand in the way of seeing a friend make more money

Get a grip
concur. another uninformed character assassination. sigh.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

themonk wrote:
jackcass wrote:
Santo wrote:One thing Beams has proved is that he is a <snip>, and this would you think bring down his trade currency, a lot of clubs will probably not want such a person playing for their club, he's as toxic as Akermanis, it's just he's a different more introverted person.

He has screwed over all his mates that he had at Collingwood.
Seriously!
:lol: :lol:

Every club would jump at the chance to get Beams
Aker at 24 was a gem, we would have won 2 flags with him in the side
No true mate would stand in the way of seeing a friend make more money

Get a grip


:oops:

Thank God, was thinking maybe it's my thinking that's screwed.
User avatar
Member 7167
Posts: 5144
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:21 pm
Location: The Collibran Hideout

Post by Member 7167 »

I would have to say the initially the club was making all the right noises in saying that they would trade Beams to Brisbane providing we received reasonable compensation in the trade. Initially I was fully convinced that most of the motivation in him wanting to move was based around his fathers health. When considering his non attendance at the Copeland Night, the fact that he was at a pub with mates and not in Queensland with his father and talk of wanting to play with his brother my opinions have changed.

I suspect that the dollars on offer by Brisbane are a motivating major factor. Some time ago a rumour emerged that Brisbane were after Beams. It would seem now that this was well founded.

This must firstly call into question his character in wanting to leave any club whilst under contract. The fact that he did not attend the Copeland was also very poor form. I would also like to know how Beams or his management were approached by Brisbane as I was of the understanding it was outside of the AFL rules for a contacted player to be approached in this manner?

Could someone please clarify?
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22174
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 150 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Member 7167 wrote:I would have to say the initially the club was making all the right noises in saying that they would trade Beams to Brisbane providing we received reasonable compensation in the trade. Initially I was fully convinced that most of the motivation in him wanting to move was based around his fathers health. When considering his non attendance at the Copeland Night, the fact that he was at a pub with mates and not in Queensland with his father and talk of wanting to play with his brother my opinions have changed.

I suspect that the dollars on offer by Brisbane are a motivating major factor. Some time ago a rumour emerged that Brisbane were after Beams. It would seem now that this was well founded.

This must firstly call into question his character in wanting to leave any club whilst under contract. The fact that he did not attend the Copeland was also very poor form. I would also like to know how Beams or his management were approached by Brisbane as I was of the understanding it was outside of the AFL rules for a contacted player to be approached in this manner?

Could someone please clarify?
I thought there were rules against approaching contracted players as well. someone on Nicks will know the rules.
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

RudeBoy wrote:
Member 7167 wrote:I would have to say the initially the club was making all the right noises in saying that they would trade Beams to Brisbane providing we received reasonable compensation in the trade. Initially I was fully convinced that most of the motivation in him wanting to move was based around his fathers health. When considering his non attendance at the Copeland Night, the fact that he was at a pub with mates and not in Queensland with his father and talk of wanting to play with his brother my opinions have changed.

I suspect that the dollars on offer by Brisbane are a motivating major factor. Some time ago a rumour emerged that Brisbane were after Beams. It would seem now that this was well founded.

This must firstly call into question his character in wanting to leave any club whilst under contract. The fact that he did not attend the Copeland was also very poor form. I would also like to know how Beams or his management were approached by Brisbane as I was of the understanding it was outside of the AFL rules for a contacted player to be approached in this manner?

Could someone please clarify?
I thought there were rules against approaching contracted players as well. someone on Nicks will know the rules.
Are the AFL poaching laws still in place?
Post Reply