Jack Watts

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
Breadcrawl
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm

Post by Breadcrawl »

He'd be a much better return for H than Varcoe.

If he's on the table then he is who we want if they want Lumumba.

If they want much more, they are living in the past
they can smell what we're cookin'
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Could he play the Maxwell role? With Maxy, Heater and H all gone we could use a mobile half back flanker.
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19521
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 163 times
Been liked: 59 times

Post by Presti35 »

All we can offer is pick 30 and/or 48 for him.

(Mind you he's prob worth around pick 30. But I'd still try to get Mullett first).
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
burton
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:45 pm

Post by burton »

+1 on Watts for me. Great aerobic capacity around the ground, can go forward, could 'maybe' pinch hit in the ruck if he put on some size (197cm).
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

Coxy83 wrote:Melbourne believe he is valuable due to him being the number one pick.
Yup. They believe he is valuable 'coz they paid way too much for him. He must be valuable, right? Look how much they paid!


Er ... given what the plumber just charged me, I happen have some of the most expensive turds around. You can have one for .... they must be pretty valuable, look how much I paid for them ..... so ... OK, it's a great price but you can have one for just $500. What a bargain!
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
stoliboy
Posts: 4972
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 47 times

Post by stoliboy »

He is valuable... worth double for every finals game he's played.
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
User avatar
Damien
Posts: 5718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 7:01 pm
Location: Croydon Vic
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 11 times

Post by Damien »

Id be asking the question. Has youth on his side and the change of environs could be his making.
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Pick 5 for Watts and 12.

Any takers?
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

^ Nope.

I wouldn't mind a punt on Watts, but when you bet at those odds you don't want to be laying out any big green or yellow notes, just an orange one or a blue one and a pink. He's worth a flutter with second-round pick or a swap with an older proven best-22 player (H, for example, even someone like Goldsack if they threw in a late pick) but we don't want to be throwing away a precious top 10 pick of such a risky proposition.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
Breadcrawl
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm

Post by Breadcrawl »

swoop42 wrote:Pick 5 for Watts and 12.

Any takers?
No.

Why do you hate pick 5 swoop?

If you aren't trying to pump it up to 2 or 3 you're trying to downgrade it to 12.

The 'clear 4' crap is crap. I'll bet ya one of them slides. Hine's track record turning pick 5s into gold is very very good
they can smell what we're cookin'
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19521
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 163 times
Been liked: 59 times

Post by Presti35 »

swoop42 wrote:Pick 5 for Watts and 12.

Any takers?
No, but if you said Jeremy Cameron....
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Breadcrawl wrote:
swoop42 wrote:Pick 5 for Watts and 12.

Any takers?
No.

Why do you hate pick 5 swoop?

If you aren't trying to pump it up to 2 or 3 you're trying to downgrade it to 12.

The 'clear 4' crap is crap. I'll bet ya one of them slides. Hine's track record turning pick 5s into gold is very very good
There isn't a clear pick 5 this year in my mind.

In Hines there might be and that's all that counts but what if there isn't?

Players like Pickett, Laverde, Ahern, Lever, Weller, could all go anywhere between 5 and 12.

Remember last year with 6 it was always going to be either Scharenberg or Aish for us so unless someone comes from the clouds like Bontempelli last year which was a little unusual then personally I'd be comfortable exchanging pick 5, 30 for 8 and 15 (not likely accepted by GC)

Pick 8 could very well get us the same player we liked at 5 (unlike last year) and 15 could get us someone like a Lamb who be an excellent pick up with big upside but not quite worth pick 5 in most peoples mind.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

^^I remember the last time we did this. Picked up Egan instead of Lewis.
Well done boys!
User avatar
Damien
Posts: 5718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 7:01 pm
Location: Croydon Vic
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 11 times

Post by Damien »

Pendles could have slipped through way beyond 4 and Decka may well have another left field up his sleeve but it'd be a big risk to trade down to 12 to get Watts and take the gamble. In Hine I trust
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Post Reply