If Beams didn't want to leave ...

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

If Beams didn't want to leave ...

Post by John Wren »

... what would the trade period look like for us?

outside of trading h i doubt we'd have been very active at all. given the club was very bouyant at the start of 2014 about our premiershipp prospects i don't think they believe much needs to change with our list. we have replacements - albeit some still a work in prgress - for those that dropped off the list by season'send.

with beams moving on we ultimately pick up a couple of players (b+ and c-) and move higher up the draft order.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Domesticated_Ape
Posts: 525
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:27 pm

Post by Domesticated_Ape »

I reckon we'd just be trying to use H to bring in Greenwood. Apparently we can only afford Varcoe after Beams leaves.

We might have offered our third rounder for Crisp too.
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Yeah I expected a boring trade period given we'd been fairly active in the last two. Thank God for Beams livening things up for us.
Well done boys!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

I still think we would have targeted Greenwood and Varcoe.

Lumumba might have went to North with pick 30 used on Varcoe.

Greenwood would have been a got get even with Beams but now he's essential.

Varcoe is a break even swap for Lumumba.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Woops forget about our supposed salary cap issues.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Post Reply