Jack Watts
Moderator: bbmods
- Breadcrawl
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm
- Tannin
- Posts: 18748
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
- Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
Yup. They believe he is valuable 'coz they paid way too much for him. He must be valuable, right? Look how much they paid!Coxy83 wrote:Melbourne believe he is valuable due to him being the number one pick.
Er ... given what the plumber just charged me, I happen have some of the most expensive turds around. You can have one for .... they must be pretty valuable, look how much I paid for them ..... so ... OK, it's a great price but you can have one for just $500. What a bargain!
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
- stoliboy
- Posts: 4979
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 57 times
He is valuable... worth double for every finals game he's played.
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
- Tannin
- Posts: 18748
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
- Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
^ Nope.
I wouldn't mind a punt on Watts, but when you bet at those odds you don't want to be laying out any big green or yellow notes, just an orange one or a blue one and a pink. He's worth a flutter with second-round pick or a swap with an older proven best-22 player (H, for example, even someone like Goldsack if they threw in a late pick) but we don't want to be throwing away a precious top 10 pick of such a risky proposition.
I wouldn't mind a punt on Watts, but when you bet at those odds you don't want to be laying out any big green or yellow notes, just an orange one or a blue one and a pink. He's worth a flutter with second-round pick or a swap with an older proven best-22 player (H, for example, even someone like Goldsack if they threw in a late pick) but we don't want to be throwing away a precious top 10 pick of such a risky proposition.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
- Breadcrawl
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm
No.swoop42 wrote:Pick 5 for Watts and 12.
Any takers?
Why do you hate pick 5 swoop?
If you aren't trying to pump it up to 2 or 3 you're trying to downgrade it to 12.
The 'clear 4' crap is crap. I'll bet ya one of them slides. Hine's track record turning pick 5s into gold is very very good
they can smell what we're cookin'
There isn't a clear pick 5 this year in my mind.Breadcrawl wrote:No.swoop42 wrote:Pick 5 for Watts and 12.
Any takers?
Why do you hate pick 5 swoop?
If you aren't trying to pump it up to 2 or 3 you're trying to downgrade it to 12.
The 'clear 4' crap is crap. I'll bet ya one of them slides. Hine's track record turning pick 5s into gold is very very good
In Hines there might be and that's all that counts but what if there isn't?
Players like Pickett, Laverde, Ahern, Lever, Weller, could all go anywhere between 5 and 12.
Remember last year with 6 it was always going to be either Scharenberg or Aish for us so unless someone comes from the clouds like Bontempelli last year which was a little unusual then personally I'd be comfortable exchanging pick 5, 30 for 8 and 15 (not likely accepted by GC)
Pick 8 could very well get us the same player we liked at 5 (unlike last year) and 15 could get us someone like a Lamb who be an excellent pick up with big upside but not quite worth pick 5 in most peoples mind.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am