Rating our selections. What do you think?

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

How do you rate our drafting this year

Highly pleased
18
32%
Pleased
26
46%
Neither here nor there
9
16%
Disappointed
4
7%
 
Total votes: 57

watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Rating our selections. What do you think?

Post by watt price tully »

Given we are all (more or less) armchair selectors who know little about the draftees on offer what do you think about who we have drafted so far?

I'm pleased with who we have selected.

5 & 30:

Great kicks, tough, with speed & footy players rather than athletes if you can make that distinction.

I need to know more about Goodyear (as though I know about the other two). But the mail has been good on #5 & #30.
Last edited by watt price tully on Thu Nov 27, 2014 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

nfi. a mate of mine involved with oakleigh chargers is rapt we got de goey.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

De Goey does look the goods.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4086
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

Happy with De Goey, wrapt with Maynard, underwhelmed by Goodyear. But as you say, NFI, really.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

5, 9 and 30 highly pleased.

48 Neither here nor there

75 Disappointed.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

Do you know Swoop if passing on 75 gives us an extra pick in the Rookie draft?

If it does there could be a smokey / strategy we are waiting for. Hope it's Yarran if he hasn't gone yet.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22169
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 146 times

Post by RudeBoy »

A little underwhelmed actually......but honestly wtfwik? :roll:
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

watt price tully wrote:
swoop42 wrote:5, 9 and 30 highly pleased.

48 Neither here nor there

75 Disappointed.
Do you know Swoop if passing on 75 gives us an extra pick in the Rookie draft?

If it does there could be a smokey / strategy we are waiting for. Hope it's Yarran if he hasn't gone yet.
we'll take two picks to rookie draft.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

watt price tully wrote:
swoop42 wrote:5, 9 and 30 highly pleased.

48 Neither here nor there

75 Disappointed.
Do you know Swoop if passing on 75 gives us an extra pick in the Rookie draft?

If it does there could be a smokey / strategy we are waiting for. Hope it's Yarran if he hasn't gone yet.
I believe that the list space by our non selection will be filled by Frost as our nominated rookie prior to the start of the season.

Yarran wasn't selected in the national draft.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

Fairly happy without knowing anything really, the Goodyear pick worries me a little, pick 48 is always going to have a flaw or 2.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
User avatar
MagpieBat
Posts: 17846
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:05 pm
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...

Post by MagpieBat »

watt price tully wrote:
swoop42 wrote:5, 9 and 30 highly pleased.

48 Neither here nor there

75 Disappointed.
Do you know Swoop if passing on 75 gives us an extra pick in the Rookie draft?

If it does there could be a smokey / strategy we are waiting for. Hope it's Yarran if he hasn't gone yet.
It does.

But then again, there is no minimum number of rookies a club has to pick either, so theoretically we could just go with Frost/Gault/Armstrong and leave it at that...
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

MagpieBat wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
swoop42 wrote:5, 9 and 30 highly pleased.

48 Neither here nor there

75 Disappointed.
Do you know Swoop if passing on 75 gives us an extra pick in the Rookie draft?

If it does there could be a smokey / strategy we are waiting for. Hope it's Yarran if he hasn't gone yet.
It does.

But then again, there is no minimum number of rookies a club has to pick either, so theoretically we could just go with Frost/Gault/Armstrong and leave it at that...
Thanks for that, did we have a pick 84 as well or some such thing?

BTW, loved your Filth post in BF - what a ripper :D
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

swoop42 wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
swoop42 wrote:5, 9 and 30 highly pleased.

48 Neither here nor there

75 Disappointed.
Do you know Swoop if passing on 75 gives us an extra pick in the Rookie draft?

If it does there could be a smokey / strategy we are waiting for. Hope it's Yarran if he hasn't gone yet.
I believe that the list space by our non selection will be filled by Frost as our nominated rookie prior to the start of the season.

Yarran wasn't selected in the national draft.
Cheers. Hope we rookie list the kid.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

watt price tully wrote:
didick wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:A little underwhelmed actually......but honestly wtfwik? :roll:
I think there should be a wtfwik voting option.
Essentially, that was in the OP: that is, notwithstanding the fact that most of us know SFA about the recruits what is your opinion?
i am waiting for murdoch (or any of a number of nick's posters) to tell me what it is.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
MagpieBat
Posts: 17846
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:05 pm
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...

Post by MagpieBat »

watt price tully wrote: Thanks for that, did we have a pick 84 as well or some such thing?

BTW, loved your Filth post in BF - what a ripper :D
No, we didn't.

Where you might be getting confused is that our pick 75 was originally pick 85, but once the AFL took out the rookie upgrades (which are not read out at the draft anymore), it got kicked up to pick 75.

And thanks for the praise on the other thing. Gave me a good laugh! :lol:
Post Reply