Agree. Hurts opposition the other way. Kid can play.BucksIsFutureCoach wrote:Crisp is a better run with player than McCaffer in my opinion. Negates as well as makes his own play. Beams trade is looking better with each week.FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote:Must say, I thought he'd be a fringe plodder after a couple of games but he's growing on me.
Jack Crisp - Crispy
Moderator: bbmods
- jackcass
- Posts: 12529
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Bendigo
And attacks ball and player with venom, and improving game by game.woftam wrote:Agree. Hurts opposition the other way. Kid can play.BucksIsFutureCoach wrote:Crisp is a better run with player than McCaffer in my opinion. Negates as well as makes his own play. Beams trade is looking better with each week.FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote:Must say, I thought he'd be a fringe plodder after a couple of games but he's growing on me.
- piedys
- Posts: 13421
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 100 times
Loving the Crispmeister! Best set of steak-knives since Medhurst!didick wrote:Better every week.
Greenwood may be lucky to get a game this year.
What a trade!!!
Thank you very much Beamsy for farking off.
And thanks to Leppitsch and Swann for playing hard ball!!
Ah, the 2007 trade Tarrant to Freo for pick #8 [Reid] McMeal deal.
Tarrant nicely fitted out with a 4-year homing beacon.
But I digress...
So what did ya do today Beamsy? Maaaaaate, some shit went down at the G today, I tells ya...
Oh.. and playing hard ball with the Bears? Wait to hear what Eddie and Gary have got lined up for you kunts when Aish wants OUT!!
Dyso
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:45 pm
- Been liked: 2 times
- piedys
- Posts: 13421
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 100 times
No let's trade Beams back, play him today, and statistically lose -1700 metres with his over rated backwards +30 disposals to the opposition goal end.Duff Soviet Union wrote:So Crisp is 7 to 9 goals better than Beams?Pies4shaw wrote:Let's call a spade a spade - play Beams in place of Crisp today and Collingwood loses by 3 to 5 goals.
I really like Crisp, but let's not be stupid here.
We miss Beams under the pack getting the hard ball - and NOWHERE else.
Last edited by piedys on Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
- piedys
- Posts: 13421
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 100 times
Thank you linesman, thank you ball boys...swoop42 wrote:I really like this kid.
Hard worker and just bloody hard at the ball.
Finished off the year well for Brisbane so was confident we had something to work with and to think we still have De Goey and Greenwood to come.
Game, set, match Mr. Hine.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
He went to watson today and slowed him right down.
I just dont see this kid not improving further either.
The defensive side of his game is outstanding. When greenwood comes back and he starts to get a bit of outside ball, i think he will be better again for us.
In terms of numbers, I reckon the beams trade could probably return us about 300 to 400 games from that deal in total ( crisp 100 +, greenwood 100, degoey 100 + )
I just dont see this kid not improving further either.
The defensive side of his game is outstanding. When greenwood comes back and he starts to get a bit of outside ball, i think he will be better again for us.
In terms of numbers, I reckon the beams trade could probably return us about 300 to 400 games from that deal in total ( crisp 100 +, greenwood 100, degoey 100 + )
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
-
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 4:36 pm
- Collingwood Crackerjack
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:11 am
- Location: Canberra
- Piethagoras' Theorem
- Posts: 19603
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 17 times
I'm not even sure Beams was that. Seemed more a link up player or finisher offerer. One thing he was brilliant at was kicking goals but Crisp looking more than handy in that area too.piedys wrote:No let's trade Beams back, play him today, and statistically lose -1700 metres with his over rated backwards +30 disposals to the opposition goal end.Duff Soviet Union wrote:So Crisp is 7 to 9 goals better than Beams?Pies4shaw wrote:Let's call a spade a spade - play Beams in place of Crisp today and Collingwood loses by 3 to 5 goals.
I really like Crisp, but let's not be stupid here.
We miss Beams under the pack getting the hard ball - and NOWHERE else.
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.