Crows chasing Scharanberg

Dave The Man · Post by **Dave The Man** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:11 pm

Crows chasing Scharanberg

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...r ... 7343592638

Doc63 · Post by **Doc63** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:19 pm

I'm not surprised. But you'd think he'd stick around for a while after all he's been through.

melliot · Post by **melliot** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:27 pm

I may be silly, but isn't Danger a restricted free agent? So why would we trade Scharenberg for him?

It's a matter of who Danger chooses to play for and if Crows choose to match the offer.

However, if Scharenberg chooses to leave, we can trade or he goes back to the draft. Personally I'd be flawed if he left.

Bob Sugar · Post by **Bob Sugar** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:29 pm

I'd be bitterly disappointed if he left considering the faith we've shown.

Dave The Man · Post by **Dave The Man** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:31 pm

Why was it put here so early in the Season.

I thought it was okay to post that stuff and Stays up for a Week or 2.

Now it will sit here and no one will read it

swoop42 · Post by **swoop42** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:31 pm

I could have sworn he signed a contract extension at the end of last year.

Can't see him leaving.

Bob Sugar · Post by **Bob Sugar** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:37 pm

melliot wrote:I may be silly, but isn't Danger a restricted free agent? So why would we trade Scharenberg for him?

It's a matter of who Danger chooses to play for and if Crows choose to match the offer.

However, if Scharenberg chooses to leave, we can trade or he goes back to the draft. Personally I'd be flawed if he left.

You misread the article, it said the crows would have a spare million to go after the likes of Shazza, but they would still have to please us on the trade table.

Dave The Man · Post by **Dave The Man** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:38 pm

melliot wrote:I may be silly, but isn't Danger a restricted free agent? So why would we trade Scharenberg for him?

It's a matter of who Danger chooses to play for and if Crows choose to match the offer.

However, if Scharenberg chooses to leave, we can trade or he goes back to the draft. Personally I'd be flawed if he left.

Agree - Be massive Surprise IF he asked to be Traded

Post by **RudeBoy** » Thu May 07, 2015 10:53 pm

melliot wrote:I may be silly, but isn't Danger a restricted free agent? So why would we trade Scharenberg for him?

It's a matter of who Danger chooses to play for and if Crows choose to match the offer.

However, if Scharenberg chooses to leave, we can trade or he goes back to the draft. Personally I'd be flawed if he left.

No-one's suggesting we'd trade Scharenberg for Dangerfield. What is being suggested is that if the Crows lose Dangerfield they will have a shit load of money to attract new players, one of them being Scharenberg. We can only hope he plays senior footy in the second half of the season and then wants to stay.

Az · Post by Az » Thu May 07, 2015 11:02 pm

We showed faith in him by taking him with our first pick. Surely he'll return that faith and sign on. He'll get in some solid games in the VFL, work his way into that form that would have had him snapped at pick 2 if not for his feet, and finally play some senior footy. By all accounts he has a decent head on his shoulders, and to turn your back on the club that has helped you through a very big hiccup in your career... kid would be mad to do that even if the lure of home seemed irresistible.

Dave The Man · Post by **Dave The Man** » Thu May 07, 2015 11:11 pm

Az wrote:We showed faith in him by taking him with our first pick. Surely he'll return that faith and sign on. He'll get in some solid games in the VFL, work his way into that form that would have had him snapped at pick 2 if not for his feet, and finally play some senior footy. By all accounts he has a decent head on his shoulders, and to turn your back on the club that has helped you through a very big hiccup in your career... kid would be mad to do that even if the lure of home seemed irresistible.

Agree - He would not look great. IF he left after 2 years.

When we drafted him so Highly when he had Bad Feet Problems

melliot · Post by **melliot** » Thu May 07, 2015 11:15 pm

RudeBoy wrote:
melliot wrote:I may be silly, but isn't Danger a restricted free agent? So why would we trade Scharenberg for him?

It's a matter of who Danger chooses to play for and if Crows choose to match the offer.

However, if Scharenberg chooses to leave, we can trade or he goes back to the draft. Personally I'd be flawed if he left.
No-one's suggesting we'd trade Scharenberg for Dangerfield. What is being suggested is that if the Crows lose Dangerfield they will have a shit load of money to attract new players, one of them being Scharenberg. We can only hope he plays senior footy in the second half of the season and then wants to stay.

Must have misread it. So I'm probably silly.

Will have to be pick 6 or better. But you'd think he'd want to repay the faith after our wait for him to come good.

toovmeister · Post by **toovmeister** » Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 pm

I love the way the dangerfield camp has all and sundry fooled into thinking he's heading to Geelong just because he's from down that way. He'll be coming back to victoria ok, but he ain't heading for the cattery and is going to be some bombshell when he lands at the pies

Culprit · Post by **Culprit** » Fri May 08, 2015 7:51 am

His Manager is behind the leak to increase his pay in negotiations. Suckers.

John Wren · Post by **John Wren** » Fri May 08, 2015 8:37 am

i doubt schazza is going anywhere. it's exciting times at camp westpac.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

Crows chasing Scharanberg

Crows chasing Scharanberg

Re: Crows Chasing Scharanberg