Post match: Pies down again - All comments please.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Monco Matt
Posts: 3093
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:47 am
Location: Sittin, Drinkin, Reloadin & Waitin

Post by Monco Matt »

Should have lost by 10 goals. A very meek, lame, soft, pathetic, heartless effort that. The turnovers were never ending. The skills were appalling and our rucks were barely competitive, destroyed at every center clearance all day. And our mids looked out of their depth, as soon as they stopped their tackling pressure they were cut to ribbons. Another frustrating game of Magpies football, another weekend ruined.
RED "BABY" CAVANAUGH: Didn't hear what the bet was.

MONCO: Your life.
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

Post by Mugwump »

Pies4shaw wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:Not good at all. WC inaccuracy kept the game close but the game represented one of a top 8 versus bottom 8 team.
Funny, that - check out the respective ladder positions.

Collingwood actually played reasonably competitively and the game plan held up well, considering that they had to cover the loss of Cloke, Adams and Elliott. Some of you have ridiculous expectations about what the team will do when its entire forward line gets a calf injury 5 minutes into the first quarter.

It was also great to see one or two of you getting in early to bag Sidebottom: it's always that little bit harder to bag him after the 37 disposal game.
right on all counts. White is not the answer, but the bronx cheers were a much weaker effort than his.
Two more flags before I die!
User avatar
Brenny
Posts: 5253
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:56 pm
Location: Westpac Centre

Post by Brenny »

^^ I thought White was OK. What as he supposed to do with 2 players on him. He did many right things bringing the ball to ground. Didn't think he was bad.

I didn't think much of the game from either side to be honest with you.

I didn't think it was overly exciting by either side.

To be honest, the thought of Etihad and 4:35, I wasn't really feeling it to be honest.

Greenwood is to never leave the side! Brilliant first game.

Varcoe... My god man... brilliant!
Last edited by Brenny on Sat Jul 18, 2015 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20133
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Pies4shaw wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:Not good at all. WC inaccuracy kept the game close but the game represented one of a top 8 versus bottom 8 team.
Funny, that - check out the respective ladder positions.

Collingwood actually played reasonably competitively and the game plan held up well, considering that they had to cover the loss of Cloke, Adams and Elliott. Some of you have ridiculous expectations about what the team will do when its entire forward line gets a calf injury 5 minutes into the first quarter.

It was also great to see one or two of you getting in early to bag Sidebottom: it's always that little bit harder to bag him after the 37 disposal game.
We didn't play like the top 8 team. Even though we are in the 8, our game plan today resembled one of a team trying to not lose by a big margin, rather than trying to win.
Last edited by What'sinaname on Sat Jul 18, 2015 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

I heard tonight that Seeds has been playing injured with regular jabs in his backside / hip area. Dissappointing but we need some persective: better chance for higher draft selections
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
Collingwood Crackerjack
Posts: 3567
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:11 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Collingwood Crackerjack »

Never looked likely, a bad loss but one that wasn't unexpected.

A bit more composure in the forward line and we may have given it a shake
User avatar
Captain_MyCaptain
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: home

Post by Captain_MyCaptain »

Can't beat Eagles. Now sitting 8th.

REALITY CHECK!!!
The window is open my friend!
User avatar
Dangles
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 5:13 am

Post by Dangles »

Wonder how long Cloke and Elliott will be out for? Also wonder what tall they'll bring in to replace Cloke? Gault, Moore or Marsh?
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Marsh.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34885
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 135 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

What'sinaname wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:Not good at all. WC inaccuracy kept the game close but the game represented one of a top 8 versus bottom 8 team.
Funny, that - check out the respective ladder positions.

Collingwood actually played reasonably competitively and the game plan held up well, considering that they had to cover the loss of Cloke, Adams and Elliott. Some of you have ridiculous expectations about what the team will do when its entire forward line gets a calf injury 5 minutes into the first quarter.

It was also great to see one or two of you getting in early to bag Sidebottom: it's always that little bit harder to bag him after the 37 disposal game.
We didn't play like the top 8 team. Even though we are in the 8, our game plan today resembled one of a team trying to not lose by a big margin, rather than trying to win.
Well, yes - that was always going to be the case. I don't quite get how when the completely obvious unfolds so many posters on Nick's seem surprised.
User avatar
MightyMagpie
Posts: 3450
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: WA

Post by MightyMagpie »

We clearly have the ability to limit the scoring of the best scoring teams - the defensive pressure from our mids and our backline in particular is to be commended.

We do get nutted in the midfield more than we should, but this will be a strength of ours when we have Swan, Greenwood, Crisp and Adams all firing together to set up Pendles, Sidebottom, etc

We lack front and centre crumbers in the forward line and that little bit of polish that turns points into goals. I can see potential in De Goey and Broomhead, but Fasolo and Elliott need to add this to their game instead of playing purely as tall marking smalls.

I will be interested to see how we play without Cloke. I don't mind a small forward line with the resting ruck in the goalsquare to bring the ball to ground. We just need crumbers.
All We Can Be
User avatar
think better
Posts: 3113
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 40 times

Post by think better »

HAL wrote:Marsh.
That almost sounded sensible - who are you and what have you done with Hal?
I think therefore I think - I think
User avatar
Dangles
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 5:13 am

Post by Dangles »

HAL wrote:Marsh.
OK. Might as well give him a go.
58pie
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:51 am

Post by 58pie »

Hard too watch with delivery to the opposition. So many errors and fumbles. Sick of Toovey and Blair getting a game. Ben Kennedy did not set the world on fire but he is still young and leaves the other Ben for dead. White was hopeless and needs a spell. Please Bucks get Scharenberg and Karnezis in. Tape up Reid and bring him back in the ones when he is ready. No good stuffing around in the twos. If he doesn't make we should cut him loose. Why wait for this team to develop, just win the rest and have crack.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

think better wrote:
HAL wrote:Marsh.
That almost sounded sensible - who are you and what have you done with Hal?
Can you speak any foreign languages?
Post Reply