This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
I don't understand how a player can be dropped after being sub
Previous week & only play one quater. Happened with Blair 3 weeks
Ago also.
Aish to pies, Shazza to crows, crows give Brissy a pick.
We dropped two backs for a forward and a mid, surely that is saying that maybe, just maybe this is about how we want to play the opposing team rather than a veiled message from Bucks that Schazza is off to Adelaide?!?!?
scoobydoo wrote:I hope your right but I think he could have played instead of Sinclair
Sinclair was fantastic early last week. We need his run and carry off the half back line. Schazza may be a potentially good player, but he is rather slow.
RudeBoy wrote:Having declared my skepticism about Scharenberg, I'm going to cease any more commentary, particularly criticism of the kid, until his contract issue is resolved one way or another. As I've said previously, depending on that outcome, I'll either declare him a selfish, ungrateful, slowish half back flanker, or else anoint him as the only true heir to Pendles and future Collingwood captain.
i do enjoy your balanced, even perspective on things.
You call that balance? I'll either be standing inside a chalk-drawn pentacle, mouthing ritual incantations to levitate his heart and liver out of his body, or calling for his immediate appointment to the AFL Hall of Fame.
a graduate of the rudeboy school of balance and perspective?
I just hope Shazza is given a more important role in the VFL this week, he should be our starting mid, he'll get more out of that than playing as an uncontested robot across HB at AFL level.