He is no Tom Derickxxx3rd degree wrote:Yeah Lobbe would be handy , he can kick goals and is harder at it than Mark Seaby!Darkstranger wrote:I'd take Lobbe, not getting a game at Port because of the mercenary Ryder, so can we?
Kreuzer to Pies??
Moderator: bbmods
- Magpie-Pep
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:43 pm
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.Magpie-Pep wrote:forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP..
It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience.RudeBoy wrote:The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.Magpie-Pep wrote:forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP..
-
- Posts: 5083
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Queensland
- Has liked: 6 times
- Been liked: 30 times
This is why any talk of trading Witts is insanewoftam wrote:It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience.RudeBoy wrote:The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.Magpie-Pep wrote:forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP..
You trade from areas you have extra players not a shortage.
Trade Witts and then recruit a ruckman is a no win situation
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum
- Darkstranger
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:06 am
- ronrat
- Posts: 4932
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 11:25 am
- Location: Thailand
- Piethagoras' Theorem
- Posts: 19603
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 17 times
It could easily be under the right circumstances.neil wrote:This is why any talk of trading Witts is insanewoftam wrote:It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience.RudeBoy wrote: The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.
You trade from areas you have extra players not a shortage.
Trade Witts and then recruit a ruckman is a no win situation
Witts for Carlisle as an example.
Kreuzer for nothing via F/A.
A rapidly developing Cox in reserve.
Our side would be stronger next year IMO if that was to occur.
- Deja Vu
- Posts: 4411
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am
- piedys
- Posts: 13425
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 101 times
This is my concern too...roar wrote:The kid can play but I'd be worried about his body not holding up to the rigours of afl.
We don't want a karmic-Karlton pay-back for Thoma$, with a renown injured player on big money sitting in the stands watching the seniors, for extended periods of time.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever