Kreuzer to Pies??

Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
5150
Posts: 8059
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:36 pm

Post by 5150 »

3rd degree wrote:
Darkstranger wrote:I'd take Lobbe, not getting a game at Port because of the mercenary Ryder, so can we?
Yeah Lobbe would be handy , he can kick goals and is harder at it than Mark Seaby!
He is no Tom Derickxxx
User avatar
Magpie-Pep
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:43 pm

Post by Magpie-Pep »

forward to 2017.....

"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....

FULL STOP..
Are we ready for another tilt...
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 148 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Magpie-Pep wrote:forward to 2017.....

"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....

FULL STOP..
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
Has liked: 1 time

Post by woftam »

RudeBoy wrote:
Magpie-Pep wrote:forward to 2017.....

"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....

FULL STOP..
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.
It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience.
neil
Posts: 5083
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Queensland
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 30 times

Post by neil »

woftam wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
Magpie-Pep wrote:forward to 2017.....

"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....

FULL STOP..
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.
It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience.
This is why any talk of trading Witts is insane
You trade from areas you have extra players not a shortage.
Trade Witts and then recruit a ruckman is a no win situation
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum
User avatar
Darkstranger
Posts: 1629
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:06 am

Post by Darkstranger »

You must be watching another game, Grundy & Wiits have never taken a mark overhead let alone a pack mark.
There is Collingwood and then the rest.
User avatar
ronrat
Posts: 4932
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Thailand

Post by ronrat »

What do you mean 'we'?[/quote]

nick's. i thought 'we' were onto something with the open letters.[/quote]

I smell a rat.[/quote]

I am in Thailand and shower up to 3 times a day.And use deoorant.
Annoying opposition supporters since 1967.
User avatar
Piethagoras' Theorem
Posts: 19603
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 17 times

Post by Piethagoras' Theorem »

Magpie-Pep wrote:forward to 2017.....

"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....

FULL STOP..
I'll go with that!
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

neil wrote:
woftam wrote:
RudeBoy wrote: The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground.
It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience.
This is why any talk of trading Witts is insane
You trade from areas you have extra players not a shortage.
Trade Witts and then recruit a ruckman is a no win situation
It could easily be under the right circumstances.

Witts for Carlisle as an example.

Kreuzer for nothing via F/A.

A rapidly developing Cox in reserve.

Our side would be stronger next year IMO if that was to occur.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 148 times

Post by RudeBoy »

The more I think about it the more it makes sense.

Kreuzer is a ready made top line ruckman and at a club like ours a clear match winner. Grundy is a future top ruckman. Meanwhile Cox is progressing faster than expected. That leaves Witts as possible trade bait.

I like it.
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

The kid can play but I'd be worried about his body not holding up to the rigours of afl.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Deja Vu
Posts: 4411
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am

Post by Deja Vu »

Any chance we could use free agency to nab a good player, rather than a broken down fragile hack?

Young. Lynch. Now Kruezer?

Are we trying to repay the Blues for taking Daisy off our hands?

Please...
User avatar
Dangles
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 5:13 am

Post by Dangles »

They obviously want to bring Kruezer in to replace Toovey.
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

roar wrote:The kid can play but I'd be worried about his body not holding up to the rigours of afl.
This is my concern too...
We don't want a karmic-Karlton pay-back for Thoma$, with a renown injured player on big money sitting in the stands watching the seniors, for extended periods of time.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
Post Reply