VFL 2nd Semi Final - Collingwood vs Sandringham

The home of conversation about our Reserves team - the second best men's team in the world!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

John Wren wrote:well, that was gutting. feel very flat. :(
Getting Destroyed in Ruck and Clearnces and Having no KPD after Marsh went down and Had no one to Stop Brown.

We where always going to Struggle.

They where the better Side Anyway
I am Da Man
User avatar
MagpieBat
Posts: 17846
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 2:05 pm
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...

Post by MagpieBat »

think positive wrote:Why isn't 70 in our senior team?
Because one Blair is MORE than enough, thank you very much... :shock: :wink: :lol:
I am vengeance. I am the night. I am MagpieBat.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

John Wren wrote:
perthmagpie wrote:It was six points. We lost because our structure was unbalanced: no tall backs of tall forwards. No Marsh, Still, Reid or Moore. Even with one or two of those guys we would playing next week.
incorrect. that's not why we lost.
So we where not good enough then.

Why did Moore not play?
I am Da Man
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4083
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

I also thought Marsh going down lost us the game.

JW, what do you think was the reason?
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

The biggest postive I took was how well Schaz Played
I am Da Man
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40186
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 84 times

Post by think positive »

MagpieBat wrote:
think positive wrote:Why isn't 70 in our senior team?
Because one Blair is MORE than enough, thank you very much... :shock: :wink: :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uSTOHa4Im4
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4083
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

Agree, Dave. Having to play as a KPD when Marsh went down and lack of fitness meant his second half wasn't awesome but I reckon what we saw in the first half is what we will get at afl level, when he gets a pre-season or two under his belt.

Marsh injured again is really disappointing. Really, really disappointing.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

roar wrote:Agree, Dave. Having to play as a KPD when Marsh went down and lack of fitness meant his second half wasn't awesome but I reckon what we saw in the first half is what we will get at afl level, when he gets a pre-season or two under his belt.

Marsh injured again is really disappointing. Really, really disappointing.
Missing so much footy would not be good for Fitness but got to end of Season Fit. So should have his 1st Pre-Season in 3 years be big. Though good for to show what he is Capable of.

Marsh Hammy made the Loss even Worse
I am Da Man
User avatar
GreekLunatic
Posts: 5590
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: doncaster vic australia
Been liked: 15 times

Post by GreekLunatic »

has seedsman played his last game for the club and how did he go
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40186
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 84 times

Post by think positive »

We lost it forward

Now there's something new!

Big cox dropped three gimme marks, but did a nice bash on around his ankles, (strange), so they put Dwyer forward. Had no hope against a. Ugh taller defender. I just don't get it
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

John Wren wrote:
perthmagpie wrote:It was six points. We lost because our structure was unbalanced: no tall backs of tall forwards. No Marsh, Still, Reid or Moore. Even with one or two of those guys we would playing next week.
incorrect. that's not why we lost.
Tend to agree.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

GreekLunatic wrote:has seedsman played his last game for the club and how did he go
That'll play out over the next couple of weeks but he didn't have much impact, certainly not the characteristic dash you'd expect. Be interesting to see if there is surgery in his immediate future as appears to be playing hurt.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

think positive wrote:We lost it forward

Now there's something new!

Big cox dropped three gimme marks, but did a nice bash on around his ankles, (strange), so they put Dwyer forward. Had no hope against a. Ugh taller defender. I just don't get it
We did not Play Moore or Still. We where always going to Struggle up Forward with them out
I am Da Man
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Dave The Man wrote:
John Wren wrote:
perthmagpie wrote:It was six points. We lost because our structure was unbalanced: no tall backs of tall forwards. No Marsh, Still, Reid or Moore. Even with one or two of those guys we would playing next week.
incorrect. that's not why we lost.
So we where not good enough then.

Why did Moore not play?
Moore apparently "general soreness" so I guess they thought he needed a week off.

Reid obviously put into cotton wool for 2016.

Yes, we lost structure when Marsh was hurt but realistically can't predict that or pick the team for that prospect. It likely came down to a choice of Still or Close or Moore and Close got the nod because he had more impact last week than Still and Moore's soreness.

Lost because none of our tall forwards could impose themselves like Brown. To a man, they all almost clunked contested marks.
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

Yes, Close was disappointing.
He did a couple of good things.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Post Reply