#27, #7 Ben Kennedy

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
E

Post by E »

He simply is not going to get any game time with the pies. We used him to facilitate the movement of players to bring in a player who will almost certainly be in our best 22 (I like his chances of beating White out for the third tall forward role).

He is a player capable of having an AFL career for a team not as blessed with talented mids as we are (or at least he has an outstanding shot at being a quality depth player for such a team). Collingwood facilitated a trade to allow him to earn a living.

It doesn't really matter what he is worth or what we got for him.

Its a win-win for player and club that this happened.

I wish him well. Just like I have enjoyed Stanley's modest career at GC Suns, I will similarly hope that Kennedy has a good career at Melbourne (and pray her doesn't save his best game for us).
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 1:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

In many ways, yes. In other ways, no.
User avatar
Tannin
Posts: 18748
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania

Post by Tannin »

E wrote:He simply is not going to get any game time with the pies. We used him to facilitate the movement of players to bring in a player who will almost certainly be in our best 22 (I like his chances of beating White out for the third tall forward role).

He is a player capable of having an AFL career for a team not as blessed with talented mids as we are (or at least he has an outstanding shot at being a quality depth player for such a team). Collingwood facilitated a trade to allow him to earn a living.

It doesn't really matter what he is worth or what we got for him.

Its a win-win for player and club that this happened.

I wish him well. Just like I have enjoyed Stanley's modest career at GC Suns, I will similarly hope that Kennedy has a good career at Melbourne (and pray her doesn't save his best game for us).
You nailed it, Mr E. Kennedy always was a weird selection at #19. I thought so then and nothing has changed my mind since. At, say, Pick 42, you'd reckon Kennedy was a decent pick-up. He's a player who could be and will be a decent mid/forward and will very likely play 150 games as a good ordinary player in a good ordinary side.

But to do that he needs solid game-time; he needs to start in the mix and play every week for half a season, maybe a full season. He could turn out to be a major possession winner (albeit one who sprays it around and frustrates as often as he thrills). And he was never going to get that consistent game time at Collingwood. You have to select your best 22 every week, and although we have our problems, we have too many good mids and forwards to find a spot for Kennedy every week. He is exactly like Danny Stanley: he needs to go to a weaker club, get that senior experience, and then he'll be a genuine AFL standard player. For us though, it wasn't happening. You couldn't leave out youngsters like Broomhead and Adams and De Goey just to give a lesser talent a turn, not every week.

Good luck to him at his new club. He has done his best for Collingwood and hasn't shafted us on the way out, I'll watch his career with interest, just as I have with others who did their bit for this team, then moved on elsewhere. I'll be happy to see him progress, exactly as I like to see good games from Wellingham, the Shaws, Harry and Dawsey at Melbourne, and so on.
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives!
User avatar
Cuthbert Collingwood
Posts: 5186
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 1:53 am
Location: The BBC (Brunswick Bowling Club)

Post by Cuthbert Collingwood »

Raw Hammer wrote:
Cuthbert Collingwood wrote:I'm a big fan of Ben Ken and think we will all rue the day if we let him go. Not happy Jan.
Is it his height, decision making or kicking that makes you feel this way?

Seriously, I watched plenty of VFL football this year and he still couldn't dominate a game due to his limitations.

I wish him well at Melbourne, but he had to be moved on...
To be truthful, it was his performances before this season that I liked him for. This season he was neither here nor there, but I had thought that may well swing back in his favour with another year and not being sub all the time. As far as this deal goes - I am very happy to get Howe, and hope that 68 can be used constructively in getting us Aish / Treloar or just landing a champion late pick like Swanny.

Thanks BK for your service, your attitude, and your great nature. I'm sure you'll be missed around the club.

^ and nice post Tannin lyw
McRae for Governor-General!
User avatar
MightyMagpie
Posts: 3450
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: WA

Post by MightyMagpie »

Luke Ball made a comment on TR this am about BK having to work on his endurance.

Fits in with the sub thing.
All We Can Be
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17138
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 30 times

Post by Culprit »

Kennedy is a battler who is heading to a team that is battling.
User avatar
MagpiesTheGreat
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:56 am

Post by MagpiesTheGreat »

I have got a French dictionary that is worth $20. I can't/don't use it because of whatever. So you can have it for $2.
Thank you and good bye.
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

The annoying thing only was that ben Kennedy was contracted, Howe wanted out and the Dees rated him highly previously and now, yet we failed to leverage that "supply & demand" thing.

Think about this: If Seedsman picked the Suns we would have received pick 19 or 21, yet he picks Crows whom have 28 & 32 and we yield to 32. To combine that with BK who really has gone for "pick 68" despite Hine's protestations, we have really lost on the overall.

With the Freeman (future pick) and our current 26 making up the Aish trade, we shall hope, bloody hope that the Treloar trade shall send back to the Pies pick 20 or 21 they get via Carlton.

Summary:

feel we have lost a second round pick overall.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
User avatar
magpieazza
Posts: 2305
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Griffith N.S.W

Post by magpieazza »

inxs88 wrote:The annoying thing only was that ben Kennedy was contracted, Howe wanted out and the Dees rated him highly previously and now, yet we failed to leverage that "supply & demand" thing.

Think about this: If Seedsman picked the Suns we would have received pick 19 or 21, yet he picks Crows whom have 28 & 32 and we yield to 32. To combine that with BK who really has gone for "pick 68" despite Hine's protestations, we have really lost on the overall.

With the Freeman (future pick) and our current 26 making up the Aish trade, we shall hope, bloody hope that the Treloar trade shall send back to the Pies pick 20 or 21 they get via Carlton.

Summary:

feel we have lost a second round pick overall.
If we end up with pick 20 or 21 it woiuld be a nice way to round out proceedings + Aish and Treloar.
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
SwansWay
Posts: 736
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:01 pm

Post by SwansWay »

Pick 61 for Kennedy, yet watch us pay through the nose to get Aish. Higher draft pick I know, but still didn't establish himself in the seniors much like BK.
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

inxs88 wrote:The annoying thing only was that ben Kennedy was contracted, Howe wanted out and the Dees rated him highly previously and now, yet we failed to leverage that "supply & demand" thing.

Think about this: If Seedsman picked the Suns we would have received pick 19 or 21, yet he picks Crows whom have 28 & 32 and we yield to 32. To combine that with BK who really has gone for "pick 68" despite Hine's protestations, we have really lost on the overall.

With the Freeman (future pick) and our current 26 making up the Aish trade, we shall hope, bloody hope that the Treloar trade shall send back to the Pies pick 20 or 21 they get via Carlton.

Summary:

feel we have lost a second round pick overall.
Kennedy wasn't traded for 68. If that was the case we would have traded pick 32 directly for Howe.

Positioning of these late picks are a small matter, even smaller this year apparently in a shallow draft. In the end we got the player we wanted, got rid of one we didn't rate (Kennedy) and received a decent deal for one who wanted out (Seedsman).

Kennedy was not worth anything close to a second round pick. Seedsman was and that's what we got (we were no certainty of getting 19 or 21 from the Suns). To get Howe we needed to package Kennedy because his value is higher than Seedsman's. There's really nothing wrong with this deal.
Well done boys!
Domesticated_Ape
Posts: 525
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:27 pm

Post by Domesticated_Ape »

It all depends on how Howe plays over the next 5 years compared to Seedsman and and Kennedy. That will be what tells us who won out of this deal.

Important to judge our trade period as a whole too. If we end up getting Treloar and Aish as well as keeping pick 21, then I'll pretty quickly forget about giving BK up cheaply because overall, that would be a good result.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Domesticated_Ape wrote:It all depends on how Howe plays over the next 5 years compared to Seedsman and and Kennedy. That will be what tells us who won out of this deal.

Important to judge our trade period as a whole too. If we end up getting Treloar and Aish as well as keeping pick 21, then I'll pretty quickly forget about giving BK up cheaply because overall, that would be a good result.
I'm actually hoping that a fresh start will be just the tonic for BK & the Seed to re-ignite their careers. Liked them both and was sad to see them depart. Either way, impossible to tell if they would have been able to do that at the Pies so any assessment of the success or otherwise of these trades is very subjective.
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

jackcass wrote:I'm actually hoping that a fresh start will be just the tonic for BK & the Seed to re-ignite their careers. Liked them both and was sad to see them depart. Either way, impossible to tell if they would have been able to do that at the Pies so any assessment of the success or otherwise of these trades is very subjective.
I'm actually hoping that a fresh start will be just the tonic for Howe to re-ignite his career. Hopefully we will get the best out of him. Time will tell.
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
Post Reply