Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Suggestions, praise, feedback. Need to communicate with the moderators? This is the place. If you need to communicate privately with the moderators, send email to lesbastardssinistres(at)magpies.net

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
John West
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:26 am
Location: Where things get rejected.

Post by John West »

What year are you at school? By my reckoning you're in Year 10. That would mean you haven't experienced many setbacks in life. You will learn that just because something doesn't go right it doesn't mean you have to be so negative about it. Try to look for solutions and the positives in situations. Having a negative attitude is unhealthy.
Power Without Glory
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

stui magpie wrote:Dave, there's constructive criticism and there's destructive venting.

People are entitled to be shitty at how we've been performing, I know I am, but does it add any value to anything by just behaving like an ADD riddled toddler throwing a tantrum?

People get sick to death of people who do nothing but sook, sulk and continually post the same non constructive garbage over and over again.
Quoted for accuracy.
User avatar
Hiss
Posts: 4821
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:28 pm
Location: Geelong
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Hate Posters who Abuse Negative Posts

Post by Hiss »

Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
Dave I generally disagree with you , however you are totally correct this time. People who criticize poor club performances are perfectly entitled to do so without being personally attacked by those you speak of. Piesinchess is a shocker who personally bullies me and others . Gutless
I love this club and I hold anyone in contempt who does not think it is worth fighting for.
User avatar
The_Staunton
Posts: 2374
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:07 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

Post by The_Staunton »

John West wrote:What year are you at school? By my reckoning you're in Year 10. That would mean you haven't experienced many setbacks in life. You will learn that just because something doesn't go right it doesn't mean you have to be so negative about it. Try to look for solutions and the positives in situations. Having a negative attitude is unhealthy.
It's when people say things like "GO and support CARLTON then!!!" - I hate that...it's not a constructive argument, or a point of view. It's people just telling you to virtually shut up.
We just got nutted at the clearances...
User avatar
Damien
Posts: 5718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 7:01 pm
Location: Croydon Vic
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 11 times

Post by Damien »

Jez07 wrote:They embody why Collingwood as a club not openly embraces medricotiy but laps it up. It's no shock that we've won 2 flags in 50 odd years with a supporter and member base that embraces failure.
Why is this <snip> of a troll still on here?
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

Damien wrote:Why is this <snip> of a troll still on here?
I think it's because he's yet to actually break any of the forum rules, being a troll, probably isn't a rule.
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

I'm with you all the way DTM on this.
They love snipping away at certain posters.
Say you think Bux should go and what do you get,
rubbish like "You are not a true supporter".
Unlike you DTM I love a good verbal spat.
One prominent Lollipoper called the SS "pathetic whinging bitches"!
the other night.
And what do you get on this thread " it works both ways"
Well I am sorry it mainly is a one way street.
I think there are some posters who have a number of mates on this board who stick up for each other time and time again.
It is interesting how Jez07 has set the cat amongst the pidgeons.
He has copped a huge amount of abuse.
see the post above.
flog, troll etc...
It really is comical to observe.
He certainly hasn't given much back.
Be like me DTM don't take it personally.
They will see the errors of their ways before the reckoning!
Last edited by thompsoc on Mon May 09, 2016 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
MatthewBoydFanClub
Posts: 5557
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Elwood
Been liked: 1 time

Post by MatthewBoydFanClub »

Dave The Man wrote:
Jez07 wrote:They embody why Collingwood as a club not openly embraces medricotiy but laps it up. It's no shock that we've won 2 flags in 50 odd years with a supporter and member base that embraces failure.
Lot of People on here like Failure as they seem Content with it
I wouldn't call two flags in 30 years a failure. Clubs like StKilda and Bulldogs have had stronger lists than ours in the last 30 years and they haven't won a flag in that time. Then you have teams like Melbourne which have had comparable lists to ours. They haven't won a flag in that time either. Hawthorn, Brisbane and Geelong have won multiple flags in the time frame we're talking about with team lists comparable to the famous Collingwood teams of the twenties and thirties.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

The Prototype wrote:
Damien wrote:Why is this <snip> of a troll still on here?
I think it's because he's yet to actually break any of the forum rules, being a troll, probably isn't a rule.
and Has not Abused anyone.

So like on Bigfooty with ThatsGold. Deadset Troll but does not abuse anyone so can't be Banned
I am Da Man
User avatar
Hiss
Posts: 4821
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:28 pm
Location: Geelong
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

So

Post by Hiss »

Damien wrote:
Jez07 wrote:They embody why Collingwood as a club not openly embraces medricotiy but laps it up. It's no shock that we've won 2 flags in 50 odd years with a supporter and member base that embraces failure.
Why is this <snip> of a troll still on here?
Hey why do you want to censor free speech! We don't have to agree with it! I don't either, but ffs stop trying to shut opinions down you don't like. Let them say what they want! Nicks is not some fascist site like the Chinese Government.
I love this club and I hold anyone in contempt who does not think it is worth fighting for.
User avatar
John West
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:26 am
Location: Where things get rejected.

Post by John West »

Damien wrote:
Jez07 wrote:They embody why Collingwood as a club not openly embraces medricotiy but laps it up. It's no shock that we've won 2 flags in 50 odd years with a supporter and member base that embraces failure.
Why is this <snip> of a troll still on here?
Why do people dignify its comments by responding to it?
Power Without Glory
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Re: So

Post by thompsoc »

Hiss wrote:
Damien wrote:
Jez07 wrote:They embody why Collingwood as a club not openly embraces medricotiy but laps it up. It's no shock that we've won 2 flags in 50 odd years with a supporter and member base that embraces failure.
Why is this <snip> of a troll still on here?
Hey why do you want to censor free speech! We don't have to agree with it! I don't either, but ffs stop trying to shut opinions down you don't like. Let them say what they want! Nicks is not some fascist site like the Chinese Government.
Gee Hiss that hippy water up north is really helping you.
Obviously you are an old red from the 60's.
Anyway that was a wonderful rant. Well done!
Last edited by thompsoc on Mon May 09, 2016 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Jez07
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 2:25 pm

Post by Jez07 »

BucksIsFutureCoach wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
Jez07 wrote:They embody why Collingwood as a club not openly embraces medricotiy but laps it up. It's no shock that we've won 2 flags in 50 odd years with a supporter and member base that embraces failure.
Lot of People on here like Failure as they seem Content with it
I wouldn't call two flags in 30 years a failure. Clubs like StKilda and Bulldogs have had stronger lists than ours in the last 30 years and they haven't won a flag in that time. Then you have teams like Melbourne which have had comparable lists to ours. They haven't won a flag in that time either. Hawthorn, Brisbane and Geelong have won multiple flags in the time frame we're talking about with team lists comparable to the famous Collingwood teams of the twenties and thirties.
For a club that calls itself the biggest and most famous club on a daily basis, it is failure. We aren't the Bulldogs and the Saints.
User avatar
doriswilgus
Posts: 5349
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: the great southern land
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 21 times

Post by doriswilgus »

What about people who attack people who have positive views?There are plenty of them here as well.It works both ways.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26159
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 72 times

Re: Hate Posters who Abuse Negative Posts

Post by Piesnchess »

Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
OK but how about trolls who join NIcks and ten minutes later are bagging the shit outa the whole club, I find that very pathetic too dave. :? :?
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Post Reply