Time for Draft to go

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17235
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Time for Draft to go

Post by Culprit »

With so many players experienced players getting dictated to where they should play, it's time to remove the draft or to place a clause that after a certain amount of years at a club like an apprenticeship you have the choice where you go wish to go to if you are not happy where your playing.

The salary cap will keep who goes where in check as it does in rugby as well you increase the penalties for breaching the salary cap as well.

Clubs are being rewarded for mediocrity and hard working clubs are being penalised under the current system.

Compensation may be a sticking point, but if a player does not wish to play for you, you should be asking why not bitching why they wish to move on. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
Daks
Posts: 3243
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:57 pm
Location: Melbourne.
Contact:

Post by Daks »

:? riiiighto
User avatar
GreekLunatic
Posts: 5598
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: doncaster vic australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 17 times

Post by GreekLunatic »

Spot on culprit why reward mediocrity the Afl should reward the teams who make the finals
User avatar
commonwombat
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 7:52 pm
Location: sydney/s.africa
Contact:

Post by commonwombat »

Concept seems fine, Culp. Don't know if abolishing the draft would be viable, but the free agency after 5 yrs service has merit. As you have stated, a resonably set but vigorously policed salary cap is a very strong check on the system.
he's an animal, what can u expect!!!
Bartros
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Bayswater ,Melbourne

Post by Bartros »

The draft is not rewarding mediocrity it helps level the playing field out ... Look what it has done for us since 99 it has made us a top four team instead of a lower half of the ladder side!!!

But I do admit that there should be a limit on it for example 3 years not like St.Kilda who have been there for the last four to five years...

Otherwise you would have clubs like West Coast, Essendon, Adeaide and us just going out and buying players!!! Because we are in a strong financal postion...

And...

To me that is not an even comp!!!!
Long Live the mite and power of
Shane Morwood (member of 1990 team,1988 Vic rep)

RIP Bobby Rose Snr
User avatar
JLC
Posts: 6387
Joined: Tue May 30, 2000 6:01 pm
Location: Keysborough still representing Hot Pies
Been liked: 1 time

Post by JLC »

I want premierships......i dont care about equality. Nothing about the AFL is equal

jlc
The Torres bounce is officially dead. You are walking alone now Fernando.
clokeysneighbour
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: vic

the above

Post by clokeysneighbour »

It is achieving what they want it to achieve - A TRUE "SOCIALIST CAPITALIST COMPETITION"

You cant please all of the people ALL of the time
labrooy
Posts: 1546
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 7:27 pm
Location: Toowoomba, Qld

Post by labrooy »

The system itself is fine but it does show up some inequities. St Kilda is a classic example where they have for years been a lowly placed club, receiving the best young talent in the country but staying a bottom team. They are being rewarded for mediocrity and poor player management decisions.

The other thing that seems ridiculous to me is Carlton, a club caught seriously rorting the system, can receive a priority pick and effectively get the second best young player in the country when they aren't entitled to a first or second round pick. To me that shows that the system should be reviewed.
Post Reply