#3 Daniel Wells

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 1:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:
Contact HAL

Post by HAL »

Thanks for telling me that gossip. I will remember it.
Top
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40192
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 216 times
Been liked: 86 times

Post by think positive »

Piesnchess wrote:I heard today the wells deal is done and dusted, all done.
Who gets him? Is it us?
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Top
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26159
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 72 times

Post by Piesnchess »

think positive wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:I heard today the wells deal is done and dusted, all done.
Who gets him? Is it us?
Yep, according to my impeccable source it us. 8)
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Top
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15351
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 22 times

Post by Cam »

stui magpie wrote:
Cam wrote:AndrewT = credible source
Since the poor fella's twitter account has been suspended, I guess we get the pleasure of his company until he figures a way to get around the ISP block at Big Footy. :?
I edited my post, apparently he is a credible source.
Get back on top.
Top
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44968
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 5 times
Contact:
Contact Dave The Man

Post by Dave The Man »

AndrewT wrote:I'm the source.. You will soon see anyway <snip, cut out the name calling - bbmods>. Don't question my loyalty. I just know what's happened at the club. You just guess so shut up and listen buddy and you might learn something
Well Talk to people like that and You lose a Bloody Lot of Respect
I am Da Man
Top
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

Post by Mugwump »

Cam wrote:
stui magpie wrote:
Cam wrote:AndrewT = credible source
Since the poor fella's twitter account has been suspended, I guess we get the pleasure of his company until he figures a way to get around the ISP block at Big Footy. :?
I edited my post, apparently he is a credible source.
Huh ? really ?
Two more flags before I die!
Top
mooretreloar
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm

Post by mooretreloar »

AndrewT may be a credible source, but he is not talking to everyone at the club. My view is his opinions are being formed by the person or persons giving him the information, which he is assuming is gospel and representative of every person at the club's view.
He seems to think Buckley got rid of anyone with personality. What he isn't taking into account is what were these players with personality were doing in house. If it is anything like I saw on the field, which was playing like big heads, then that may be your answer.
Top
User avatar
Redlight
Posts: 1801
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:15 pm

Post by Redlight »

AndrewT wrote:I'm the source.. You will soon see anyway Don't question my loyalty. I just know what's happened at the club. You just guess so shut up and listen buddy and you might learn something
"I'm the source"

This is genius. :D
Top
User avatar
The Prototype
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Post by The Prototype »

Redlight wrote: "I'm the source"

This is genius. :D
I think he meant he was on the sauce. :lol:


Seems a lot are trying to suggest Wells is done and dusted and a Pie, would be interesting anyway.
Top
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

Post by Mugwump »

mooretreloar wrote:AndrewT may be a credible source, but he is not talking to everyone at the club. My view is his opinions are being formed by the person or persons giving him the information, which he is assuming is gospel and representative of every person at the club's view.
He seems to think Buckley got rid of anyone with personality. What he isn't taking into account is what were these players with personality were doing in house. If it is anything like I saw on the field, which was playing like big heads, then that may be your answer.
If the players were not committed they would not have performed as they did in the last few rounds. I saw Collingwood in 1976 and that is what happens when a team and club is divided. I cant imagine why anyone sensible like Cam would call AndrewT a credible source ...?
Two more flags before I die!
Top
User avatar
Redlight
Posts: 1801
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:15 pm

Post by Redlight »

Cam wrote:
stui magpie wrote:
Cam wrote:AndrewT = credible source
Since the poor fella's twitter account has been suspended, I guess we get the pleasure of his company until he figures a way to get around the ISP block at Big Footy. :?
I edited my post, apparently he is a credible source.
Credible. Like Donald Trump.
Top
mooretreloar
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm

Post by mooretreloar »

I agree. As I posted earlier this week, at 4-8 at the bye if the team weren't happy with Buckley, then they would have put the cue in the rack and we would have ended up 4-18. It was exactly the opposite, we beat finalists in GWS and WCE, lost by a point to another finalist in Hawthorn and by 3 points to another finalist in the Dogs. Also, competitive against Adelaide. So, rubbish to say they aren't playing for Bucks.
Top
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15351
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 22 times

Post by Cam »

AndrewT is a bit rough and edgy, but is worth listening to.

Mooretreloar is much more refined and polished, and is also worth listening to.
Get back on top.
Top
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Mugwump wrote:
mooretreloar wrote:AndrewT may be a credible source, but he is not talking to everyone at the club. My view is his opinions are being formed by the person or persons giving him the information, which he is assuming is gospel and representative of every person at the club's view.
He seems to think Buckley got rid of anyone with personality. What he isn't taking into account is what were these players with personality were doing in house. If it is anything like I saw on the field, which was playing like big heads, then that may be your answer.
If the players were not committed they would not have performed as they did in the last few rounds. I saw Collingwood in 1976 and that is what happens when a team and club is divided. I cant imagine why anyone sensible like Cam would call AndrewT a credible source ...?
Tongue firmly implanted in cheek I think. All the scuttlebutt suggests Wells to Collingwood so it's not that great a claim to suggest it's a done deal. Hardly makes anyone either creditable or a genius.
Top
User avatar
Redlight
Posts: 1801
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:15 pm

Post by Redlight »

Cam wrote:AndrewT is a bit rough and edgy, but is worth listening to.

Mooretreloar is much more refined and polished, and is also worth listening to.
I give AndrewT (and any previous incarnation) zero credibility.

AndrewT could work at the club, be an ex-player or current administrator for all I care. Having inside info doesn't make the representation of that info honest, reasonable or indicative of the truth.

The world is full of the bitter and the disgruntled.

If one claims inside knowledge, then the onus is on that person to present their credentials so that their credibility can be evaluated.

That, or zip it.

"I'm the source" What a ripper. :D
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Player Forums”