WHO TAKES BRAD OTTENS ??

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
JLC
Posts: 6387
Joined: Tue May 30, 2000 6:01 pm
Location: Keysborough still representing Hot Pies
Been liked: 1 time

WHO TAKES BRAD OTTENS ??

Post by JLC »

After going to the Richmond v Bulldogs game on Friday night and then watching Collingwood v Fremantle last night on TV i have some real concerns over who we have to match up on Brad Ottens.

Brad Ottens is a great kick for goal from anywhere up to about 50 metres and is also a great mark. The only players i believe that could match up are as follows :

1. S. McKee : Has the height but not the speed to go with Ottens.

2. M. Richardson : Will he even be back from injury ??

3. S. Prestigiacomo : Ottens would be too tall

4. B. Kinnear : Ottens would be too tall

Then the other headache is Matthew Richardson. Richardson may be inconsistent but when he plays well he is a match winner.

APA

EVERYONE IS A COLLINGWOOD SUPPORTER ITS JUST THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE IN DENIAL
junkboy75
Posts: 840
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 6:01 pm

Post by junkboy75 »

how about anthony rocca? I recall that he once lined up on tony lockett. just a thought.. it might get him away from gaspar at least.

wakelin should be retained just so he can play on matthew richardson. he gave richo an absolute thrashing earlier this year.

"everyone's a winner hot pies"
User avatar
JLC
Posts: 6387
Joined: Tue May 30, 2000 6:01 pm
Location: Keysborough still representing Hot Pies
Been liked: 1 time

Post by JLC »

Yeah that may be a good move lining up Anthony Rocca on Ottens. The only thing is though we are then robbed of a key forward. Molloy generally doesnt kick many goals in a game. Our other key forward in Tarrant was well beaten last time against Richmond. So it will be an interesting decision facing Malthouse this week.

APA

EVERYONE IS A COLLINGWOOD SUPPORTER ITS JUST THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE IN DENIAL
Joel
Posts: 21161
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 1999 8:01 pm
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Joel »

Sorry to disagree JLC, but I think it would be a stupid move to move Rocca on to Ottens. We can't sacrifice key forwards so we have someone to match up on Ottens. You seem to have forgotten Clement, I think he could do the job.

JDF
User avatar
JLC
Posts: 6387
Joined: Tue May 30, 2000 6:01 pm
Location: Keysborough still representing Hot Pies
Been liked: 1 time

Post by JLC »

I said it "may" be a good move. My first preference would be Presti or Richo with Mckee dropping back to help out. Rocca should start in the forward line as he is taking great pack marks at the moment and showed more good signs in the last quarter.

Clement is not tall enough for Ottens. Clement is more suited to Richardson if Richardson plays up the ground. If Richo starts in the goal square then i would start Shags on him.

But im all for open discussion and its good when people have different opinions as its an opportunity to see things from a different view. So Joel no need to be sorry if you disagree with me

APA

EVERYONE IS A COLLINGWOOD SUPPORTER ITS JUST THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE IN DENIAL
DaicosForever

Post by DaicosForever »

Anyone considered the possiblity of Frazer being thrown on him...Might make for interesting contest. Bring Rich back hopefully next week giving us another defensive option and u just never know...Frazer has the agility and height to go with him, maybey found wanting in the strength dept but frazer will be able to run off him which could have its advantages also especially out of defence.

Louis
User avatar
JLC
Posts: 6387
Joined: Tue May 30, 2000 6:01 pm
Location: Keysborough still representing Hot Pies
Been liked: 1 time

Post by JLC »

The problem with putting Rocca or Fraser or any other forwards is that we have conceded an advantage already to Richmond. We should be thinking who does Richmond have to match up on Rogan if Rogan plays up forward. We have to show confidence in one of our defenders to start the match off with.

APA

EVERYONE IS A COLLINGWOOD SUPPORTER ITS JUST THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE IN DENIAL
User avatar
Clemo
Posts: 4039
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 1998 8:01 pm
Location: Mentone

Post by Clemo »

I reckon Rocca, Rogan & Richo at different parts of the game. Bit of pinch hitting I reckon.

_____________________
Collingwood Forever !
clemo@magpies.net
http://www.netspace.net.au/~clemo
timagpie

Post by timagpie »

wakelin to run off richardson and clement to cut out ottens.
We really need to pressure richscums talls and run off them all night.

GOOD OLD COLLINGWOOD UNITED FOREVER AND EVER AMEN GOD BLESS THEM ALL
User avatar
JLC
Posts: 6387
Joined: Tue May 30, 2000 6:01 pm
Location: Keysborough still representing Hot Pies
Been liked: 1 time

Post by JLC »

Clement is too short for Otto. Clement would be better suited to Joel Bowden in the midfield or another Richmond player.

APA

EVERYONE IS A COLLINGWOOD SUPPORTER ITS JUST THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE IN DENIAL
User avatar
~Madness~
Posts: 4490
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Vic, Au

Post by ~Madness~ »

I think we should play him like we used to play Lockett sometimes way back when.
the loose ruckman in defence stopping the pass...Monky was a monty for it, it worked great on lockett....

ok not always would it stop him, i mean what could? but its a thought...

McKee to take the tap, and drop back? or Josh play loose??

dunno, just a thought..?????
timagpie

Post by timagpie »

i've got a great idea put molly,rocca interchangeable on otto and place clement on rico.
Molly to rough up the richmonds talls would be great and have molly to take richo then take on otto would be great and try to get under the skin of otto and richo and pressure them and unsettel them. This would be great.

GOOD OLD COLLINGWOOD UNITED FOREVER AND EVER AMEN GOD BLESS THEM ALL
the prez

Post by the prez »

If I recall our last meeting,Wakes killed Richo and like wise Richo on Ottens.If Richo(ours) doesn't come up,we have Presto or Clement.I 'd like to see someone like Molly start on Richo for about half a qtr just to try and unsettle him.He loses it very easily and it flows thru his whole night.Maybe Ant can pay him a special visit.Wink.Wink.

GO WOODS
User avatar
Kristin5
Posts: 2117
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2001 6:01 pm

Post by Kristin5 »

I think that it'll be Presti lining up on Ottens - let's face it that Ottens will be too tall for most of our backman, but Presti will probably be closest in height and mobility. I think it's a negative move to put Rocca on Ottens, as that's one less attacking player in the forward line. I think Wakelin should be on Richardson - it's unlikely Wakelin will have two really bad games in a row, and they should match up well in terms of size and mobility. Richardson is pretty useless anyway - how many will he kick out on the full this time?!!!

I'm pretty worried about Gale actually - while he really is a bit of a hack, he always seems to play well against the Pies.
The room service guy

Post by The room service guy »

Presti for sure. Even if he doesn't get one possession, we just need someone who'll sit on Otto the whole game. Presti can do that.
If that doesn't work, perhaps Josh or Steve Mckee. Mckee has done well down back before, and he's been struggling around the ground the last 4 weeks, so he'd be worth a try.

THE RUP IS ON FIRE!!!!!!!!!!
Post Reply