Did anyone else notice at the start of the last quarter when Henry Schade appeared to be on a treadmill as a tiger ball bounced through for a clutch goal?
All Schade needed to do was dive and knock the ball through for a point.
Was absolutely unbelievable. I wanted to throw up.
Post Match. Tigers def. Pies - All comments please
Moderator: bbmods
-
mooretreloar
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm
-
MarkOSuv
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:41 pm
What is a player going to say?mooretreloar wrote:If you don't want to take my opinion on board that the loss on Thursday night was on the players, then listen to two of the club's leadership group:
- Scott 'Bucks can't kick the goals for us' Pendlebury, and
- Taylor 'We let Bucks down' Adams.
The coach cost us the game?
Take what is said in public by the club with a grain of salt. It's worthless.
-
mooretreloar
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm
-
MarkOSuv
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:41 pm
My only agenda is the club winning games of football.mooretreloar wrote:Why don't you stop thinking based on your agenda of getting rid of the coach and actually think what happened in the game on Thursday night?
Your agenda and thinking is laziness of the highest order. Blame the coach, blame the coach, blame the coach is just plain laziness.
But you are putting too much stock into what a player says when asked by the media.
He isn't going to say his true feelings given these are all vetted by the club's PR department.
It's all noise at the end of the day. Actions speak louder than words.
-
What'sinaname
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 34 times
Exactly.MarkOSuv wrote:My only agenda is the club winning games of football.mooretreloar wrote:Why don't you stop thinking based on your agenda of getting rid of the coach and actually think what happened in the game on Thursday night?
Your agenda and thinking is laziness of the highest order. Blame the coach, blame the coach, blame the coach is just plain laziness.
But you are putting too much stock into what a player says when asked by the media.
He isn't going to say his true feelings given these are all vetted by the club's PR department.
It's all noise at the end of the day. Actions speak louder than words.
How many times is a coach sacked soon after having the "full support of the board". What is said in public by anyone in a football club is vetted and moderated.
-
Georgia
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:01 am
Can somebody important do something important and change the destiny of the club? I don't know how boards work and presidents get elected and that stuff but i don't think that when it comes to football they know much. They seem to be good at making money and cool things like that but do they get anything about building a good team? i am really disheartened and it's weird because when i was 16 and we won the premiership i thought we would win every year.
Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative.
-
mooretreloar
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm
^^
Your only agenda is to get rid of Buckley. It is evident in this thread and each and every other thread that you post in.
I am still waiting for you to post a contrary argument, with backup evidence, to my post as to why we lost the game on Friday night. I have a feeling that I will be waiting for a long long time.
Your only agenda is to get rid of Buckley. It is evident in this thread and each and every other thread that you post in.
I am still waiting for you to post a contrary argument, with backup evidence, to my post as to why we lost the game on Friday night. I have a feeling that I will be waiting for a long long time.
-
What'sinaname
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 34 times
Stop obsessing over me....it's creepy.mooretreloar wrote:^^
Your only agenda is to get rid of Buckley. It is evident in this thread and each and every other thread that you post in.
I am still waiting for you to post a contrary argument, with backup evidence, to my post as to why we lost the game on Friday night. I have a feeling that I will be waiting for a long long time.
-
MarkOSuv
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:41 pm
It's like a political party.What'sinaname wrote:Exactly.MarkOSuv wrote:My only agenda is the club winning games of football.mooretreloar wrote:Why don't you stop thinking based on your agenda of getting rid of the coach and actually think what happened in the game on Thursday night?
Your agenda and thinking is laziness of the highest order. Blame the coach, blame the coach, blame the coach is just plain laziness.
But you are putting too much stock into what a player says when asked by the media.
He isn't going to say his true feelings given these are all vetted by the club's PR department.
It's all noise at the end of the day. Actions speak louder than words.
How many times is a coach sacked soon after having the "full support of the board". What is said in public by anyone in a football club is vetted and moderated.
Pendlebury arrived at the club yesterday and a group of reporters were told there would be some public comment.
The PR/Media manager would have vetted Pendlebury what to say so the club controls the message.
You take what is said with a grain of salt. Anyone who doesn't just doesn't get how media teams work.
-
mooretreloar
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm
Wasn't actually talking about you, but not surprised you think I was.What'sinaname wrote:Stop obsessing over me....it's creepy.mooretreloar wrote:^^
Your only agenda is to get rid of Buckley. It is evident in this thread and each and every other thread that you post in.
I am still waiting for you to post a contrary argument, with backup evidence, to my post as to why we lost the game on Friday night. I have a feeling that I will be waiting for a long long time.
-
mooretreloar
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm
You also are not taking into account the integrity of Scott Pendlebury, who always tells it as it is, no matter what any PR tells him to say. Wake up to yourselves.MarkOSuv wrote:It's like a political party.What'sinaname wrote:Exactly.MarkOSuv wrote: My only agenda is the club winning games of football.
But you are putting too much stock into what a player says when asked by the media.
He isn't going to say his true feelings given these are all vetted by the club's PR department.
It's all noise at the end of the day. Actions speak louder than words.
How many times is a coach sacked soon after having the "full support of the board". What is said in public by anyone in a football club is vetted and moderated.
Pendlebury arrived at the club yesterday and a group of reporters were told there would be some public comment.
The PR/Media manager would have vetted Pendlebury what to say so the club controls the message.
You take what is said with a grain of salt. Anyone who doesn't just doesn't get how media teams work.
-
MarkOSuv
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:41 pm
Yeah, nah.mooretreloar wrote:You also are not taking into account the integrity of Scott Pendlebury, who always tells it as it is, no matter what any PR tells him to say. Wake up to yourselves.MarkOSuv wrote:It's like a political party.What'sinaname wrote: Exactly.
How many times is a coach sacked soon after having the "full support of the board". What is said in public by anyone in a football club is vetted and moderated.
Pendlebury arrived at the club yesterday and a group of reporters were told there would be some public comment.
The PR/Media manager would have vetted Pendlebury what to say so the club controls the message.
You take what is said with a grain of salt. Anyone who doesn't just doesn't get how media teams work.
AFL players these days are all scripted.
You are incredibly gulliable if you believe that 6 reporters reported to a non advertised press gathering without being tipped off by the Media Manager.
You are incredibly naive if you believe he hadn't been worded up what to say.
-
mooretreloar
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:05 pm
-
MarkOSuv
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:41 pm
Not doubt he has great integrity but you are a fool if you believe what is said in private is the same as what is said in public.mooretreloar wrote:The word is gullible.
You are incredibly naive if you don't believe Scott Pendlebury only says what Scott Pendlebury wants to say. Unlike a lot of people, he is a person of great integrity and honesty.