Greatest album of all time remastered and re-released

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Greatest album of all time remastered and re-released

Post by Pies4shaw »

No, I'm afraid not. We're still waiting for the definitive 6-disc edition of Dick Gaughan's "Handful of Earth".

In the meantime, though, I see there has been a 2017 50th anniversary deluxe remastering of a 1967 album by The Beatles. Has anyone heard it? Should I buy it? I have a worn-out vinyl, a replacement vinyl, a Japanese vinyl pressing, the 20th anniversary CD and the remaster from a few years back. Do I need a sixth copy of Pepper in my collection?

Otherwise, here's something to keep you going until 2031 when, no doubt, the deluxe remaster of the actual greatest album of all time will take over the stores.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PInNrFZ ... dI&index=9

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q38wBcV ... UNwQ6kuQdI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML9yQuZnf-E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tP15bKv ... UNwQ6kuQdI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0tPr_GIMd4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppcyTF- ... I&index=22

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUNwQ6kuQdI
User avatar
Mountains Magpie
Posts: 1762
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:50 pm
Location: Somewhere between now and then

Post by Mountains Magpie »

Wasn't a Gary Davis album the best of all time? lol If you're changing then I'll have Hunky Dory :wink: (nb: Quicksand now in my repertoire)

Anyways, no you don't need another version. Aren't all these remasters just laying the compression on thick? I have the original 1987 release. Remember when CDs came out and you had to wait for the 20th anniversary of Beatles albums to actually buy the CD? Ah, old times.....

So, five versions of Peppers. I've got one version of all my CDs, except Thick As A Brick 8) Including bootlegs I have several bazillion Bricks.

I'll be giving Peppers a spin tomorrow + Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields. 50 years, that's incredible and just a little disconcerting.....

MM

PS: You'll find the doco "It Was Twenty Years Ago Today" from 1987 here:

http://diggers.org/it_was_twenty.htm :D
Spiral progress, unstoppable,
exhausted sources replaced by perversion
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Mountains Magpie wrote:Wasn't a Gary Davis album the best of all time? lol If you're changing then I'll have Hunky Dory :wink: (nb: Quicksand now in my repertoire)

Anyways, no you don't need another version. Aren't all these remasters just laying the compression on thick? I have the original 1987 release. Remember when CDs came out and you had to wait for the 20th anniversary of Beatles albums to actually buy the CD? Ah, old times.....

So, five versions of Peppers. I've got one version of all my CDs, except Thick As A Brick 8) Including bootlegs I have several bazillion Bricks.

I'll be giving Peppers a spin tomorrow + Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields. 50 years, that's incredible and just a little disconcerting.....

MM

PS: You'll find the doco "It Was Twenty Years Ago Today" from 1987 here:

http://diggers.org/it_was_twenty.htm :D
Yes, I expect so. As are "Let It Bleed", "Basket of Light", "Liege and Lief", "The Songs of Ewan MacColl", "There Goes Rhyming Siming", "Wheels of Fire", "In the Court of the Crimson King", "Larks Tongues in Aspic", "Bringing it All Back Home" and "Rust in Peace", amongst many others. That's the problem with identifying any "best of". Anyway, "Mad Dogs and Englishmen" and "Beggar's Banquet" are ahead or behind all of the above, as are "Willy and the Poor Boys", "Cosmo's Factory" and "Last of the Brooklyn Cowboys".

As for Pepper, it's a good record but - rather like Paul once said of Ringo as a drummer - not even the "best" album by The Beatles. It probably was rather ground-breaking but there are probably 14 or 15 (note: some possible hint of exaggeration here) better records by them as a group. :wink:
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Shannon Noll That's what I'm talking about?
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Mountains Magpie
Posts: 1762
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:50 pm
Location: Somewhere between now and then

Post by Mountains Magpie »

Of the acres of reading on Peppers I've done over the years, one thing always stays in my mind.

I can't remember where I read it but it was along the lines of "There are no love songs on Peppers (in and of itself unique for a Beatles LP? - my question) but there is love in every track".

MM
Spiral progress, unstoppable,
exhausted sources replaced by perversion
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54843
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 168 times

Post by stui magpie »

The Beatles were over rated.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

You can test that proposition for yourself at home. Write yourself a list of the best 25 songs of all-time. If you are doing it honestly, 90 of them will be written by The Beatles.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54843
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 168 times

Post by stui magpie »

Pies4shaw wrote:You can test that proposition for yourself at home. Write yourself a list of the best 25 songs of all-time. If you are doing it honestly, 90 of them will be written by The Beatles.
With maths like that, I understand how lawyers invoicing works.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

You know nothing about real music. You know nothing about real invoicing. :wink:
User avatar
Mountains Magpie
Posts: 1762
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:50 pm
Location: Somewhere between now and then

Post by Mountains Magpie »

Nah, I reckon if anything the Beatles are under-rated

Their output is not only consistently very good or better, it's concentrated into a relatively small period of time.
Spiral progress, unstoppable,
exhausted sources replaced by perversion
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Less under-rated than Dick Gaughan - but under-rated just the same.
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

Post by Mugwump »

stui magpie wrote:The Beatles were over rated.
Yes, but their best - mostly due to McCartney - was very good in its field, and some of their early songs were mould-breaking for rock and roll ("She Loves You" is way out there for 1963, in terms of its chord progression). I reckon Penny Lane is their masterpiece ; a vivid slice of life, heightened with musical colors like an expressionist painting.

Still, I agree that much of the work has aged badly, and large chunks -including much of Pepper - are dire.
Two more flags before I die!
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

A Day in the Life, though...!

My favourite, personally, is Tomorrow Never Knows. This might seem like faint praise to some, but it sounds kind of like the Chemical Brothers remixed a George Harrison song. I had no idea that music like that existed back then.

https://youtu.be/7UjvdZm-Tu8
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54843
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 168 times

Post by stui magpie »

Mugwump wrote:
stui magpie wrote:The Beatles were over rated.
Yes, but their best - mostly due to McCartney - was very good in its field, and some of their early songs were mould-breaking for rock and roll ("She Loves You" is way out there for 1963, in terms of its chord progression). I reckon Penny Lane is their masterpiece ; a vivid slice of life, heightened with musical colors like an expressionist painting.

Still, I agree that much of the work has aged badly, and large chunks -including much of Pepper - are dire.
Yep. By contrast, the Stones work of the same era holds up generally well.
David wrote:A Day in the Life, though...!

My favourite, personally, is Tomorrow Never Knows. This might seem like faint praise to some, but it sounds kind of like the Chemical Brothers remixed a George Harrison song. I had no idea that music like that existed back then.

https://youtu.be/7UjvdZm-Tu8
They had drugs back then too
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50683
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

Whatever they were on when they wrote that, I want some.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
Post Reply