1. (I presume) Your parents own their own home (good on them).Mugwump wrote:Best not to start a post with "all due respect" if the remainder of it is largely ad hominem and full of foot-stamping and ignorant assumptions about my "privilege" and what I know and don't know. I don't particularly want to engage you on the basis of such unpleasant attacks, but both of my 87+ year old parents live on the state pension and have done so for many years. So before you lecture me on my ignorance of such matters you might want to project just a little humility amid the self-righteousness, and test your assumptions.watt price tully wrote:With all due respect that is errant nonsense. Do you know much pensioners have to live on & the cost of living. That is supreme ignorance.Mugwump wrote: I don't especially disagree with that, though the condition of the 19th Century poor vs now is really incomparably different. No one in Britain or Australia needs to resort to crime to survive or to live an essentially civilized life. ........
Do you realize how hard it is for young people who are homeless to get access to money to live?
Utter ignorance & spoken from a position of privilege.
The cost of living outweighs the capacity to pay for the poor in a lot of cases. My SIL works in a senior position at Centrelink what they are doing to young people & others is simply horrendous.
My comment compared the conditions of the 19th century poor and today's poor. The latter have state income protection in age and unemployment, minimum wage laws, government pensions, free education to age 18, free health care, workplace health and safety laws, and a plethora of opportunities for self-education. If you want to contest this with actual argument, feel free.
2. if they don't & have to pay rent then there is no way they can live on a pension & afford outgoings with the amount of the common pension provides compared to the cost of living.
3. If you think health is free, if you think state education is free then you're seriously ill informed.