Gun laws in USA??

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34877
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 181 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... lta-united

"Speaking at the CPAC conference held near Washington DC last week, Wayne LaPierre, the veteran chief executive of the NRA, warned that "opportunists" had used the shooting to "smear" the gun lobby group.

LaPierre warned his conservative audience that a "tidal wave of new European socialists" standing as Democrats would use a gun control agenda as part of a bid to "eradicate all individual freedoms" in the US."

How unfair - using a "shooting" as a means of smearing a "gun lobby group"! There's no possible link between shootings and guns.
User avatar
ronrat
Posts: 4932
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Thailand

Post by ronrat »

If the next shooting (ie the next 38 seconds) of an American is Wayne Lapeckerhead then the world will be a better place.
Annoying opposition supporters since 1967.
User avatar
Pi
Posts: 999
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:30 pm
Location: SA

Post by Pi »

the second amendment:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

if one believes in the second amendment means anything, it means you read all of it:

the problem is the NRA and most gun owners in the USA is they only read part of it; "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

They have long forgotten the part about "well regulated"

Well regulated in the modern context means federal gun licencing laws in order to make background checks actually effective.

Well regulated means people who own guns are members of of their local gun clubs and shoot regularly with members of their local community who know them well and report any potential crazy f%#@k wit.

well regulated means you don't get to buy a whole heap of guns when you feel like it and stock pile them in a room while having paranoid delusions when using psychotropic drugs.

The second amendment could actually work if it wasn't defined by illiterate fu#$kwits ...
Pi = Infinite = Collingwood = Always
Floreat Pica
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

User avatar
Skids
Posts: 9938
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:46 am
Location: ANZAC day 2019 with Dad.
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 44 times

Post by Skids »

Don't count the days, make the days count.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40237
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 339 times
Been liked: 103 times

Post by think positive »

You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
partypie
Posts: 1171
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:43 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Post by partypie »

I was a bit taken aback recently when an acquaintance who lives in Portland told me that it's almost necessary to own a gun to protect yourself.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54832
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 163 times

Post by stui magpie »

partypie wrote:I was a bit taken aback recently when an acquaintance who lives in Portland told me that it's almost necessary to own a gun to protect yourself.
The thing is, unless you practice with it you're more likely to hurt yourself than protect yourself.

handguns are not as easy to hit targets with as it looks like in the movies and some larger calibre ones have significant recoil. I fired a selection of handguns at a range a few years back and the instructor was impressed at how it didn't kick up for a novice. (if you can shoot a 12 gauge 1 handed, a desert eagle 2 hands is no problem)

A lot of larger gun shops will actually do "fittings" for the first time buyer, picking something that can fit comfortably in their hand and/or handbag and show them how to fire it so the recoil doesn't break their wrist.

Interestingly in Portland, 2 of the 3 gun stores seem to have closed, with 1 store and 2 clubs.

here's the store. They even have pink ones for the ladies. http://thegunbroker.com/product-categor ... /handguns/
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Portland is full of hipster wankers like inner Melbourne, probably pays to carry 24/7. :lol:
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54832
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 126 times
Been liked: 163 times

Post by stui magpie »

Oregon is an open carry state with no licence required unless imposed by a local municipality.

So if you walk around with a glock on your hip wearing a T shirt that says "i hate hipsters" you could have an interesting time. :P
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
K
Posts: 21552
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

stui magpie wrote:
partypie wrote:I was a bit taken aback recently when an acquaintance who lives in Portland told me that it's almost necessary to own a gun to protect yourself.

The thing is, unless you practice with it you're more likely to hurt yourself than protect yourself.


handguns are not as easy to hit targets with as it looks like in the movies and some larger calibre ones have significant recoil. I fired a selection of handguns at a range a few years back and the instructor was impressed at how it didn't kick up for a novice. (if you can shoot a 12 gauge 1 handed, a desert eagle 2 hands is no problem)
...
Even if you practise with one...
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17237
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-a ... 4z1p3.html

The NRA have spoken, nothing will change as they own Trump and the Republicans.
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17237
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

Culprit wrote:https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/nra-pushes-back-against-trump-proposals-to-tighten-us-gun-laws-20180226-p4z1p3.html

The NRA have spoken, nothing will change as they own Trump and the Republicans.
And for Pro Trumpies. He expects us to believe that he man who faked medical injury to avoid Vietnam has grown a spine and would run unarmed into a building with an armed shooter. What a lying sack of shit. He'd be hiding like a baby behind everyone he could.
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Again, how do the NRA 'own' Trump when he's a multi billionaire?

Also

Image

As for draft dodging, he had student deferments followed by being classified 1Y - medical issues meaning he'd only be called up in a national emergency. 15.4 Million kids had deferments or were disqualified. Unlike Bill Clinton who fled the draft, Trump's non service was pretty much routine. He never volunteered, but I'd never hold that against anyone and anyone who did is a bit of a C.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34877
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 181 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Post Reply