Eurydice Dixon
Moderator: bbmods
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54842
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 167 times
^
Are they really more common place or is there just less tolerance and higher expectations?
Domestic violence isn't necessarily a bigger thing now, it may even be less, but it's not hushed up and hidden any more. It used to be a dirty secret, common knowledge but not spoken about that if Al left the pub in a bad mood this arvo, the missus was gonna cop flogging when he got home.
I saw an article on line that I can't find now, the day after Eurydice was murdered, about random murder of women in the same are in the 1940's. A US Service man was caught, courtmartialed and hung by the US military, the last execution in Australia not by an Australian judiciary. These kind of vicious attacks on strangers happened, but the reporting of them was far far less.
Edit, found the article.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-o ... 993e1f1fcb
The Brownout Strangler was his moniker, Edward Leonski his name.
http://ergo.slv.vic.gov.au/explore-hist ... -strangler
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_Leonski
In the 40's and 50's, young single women didn't walk the streets at night alone. Married women were home with their husbands.
The expectations of womens rights have changed dramatically, for the better, and the vast majority of males have come along for the ride. Some more reluctantly and slowly than others, but they've come.
The people who commit rape and murder have always been there, we're just no better at preventing them
Are they really more common place or is there just less tolerance and higher expectations?
Domestic violence isn't necessarily a bigger thing now, it may even be less, but it's not hushed up and hidden any more. It used to be a dirty secret, common knowledge but not spoken about that if Al left the pub in a bad mood this arvo, the missus was gonna cop flogging when he got home.
I saw an article on line that I can't find now, the day after Eurydice was murdered, about random murder of women in the same are in the 1940's. A US Service man was caught, courtmartialed and hung by the US military, the last execution in Australia not by an Australian judiciary. These kind of vicious attacks on strangers happened, but the reporting of them was far far less.
Edit, found the article.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-o ... 993e1f1fcb
The Brownout Strangler was his moniker, Edward Leonski his name.
http://ergo.slv.vic.gov.au/explore-hist ... -strangler
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_Leonski
In the 40's and 50's, young single women didn't walk the streets at night alone. Married women were home with their husbands.
The expectations of womens rights have changed dramatically, for the better, and the vast majority of males have come along for the ride. Some more reluctantly and slowly than others, but they've come.
The people who commit rape and murder have always been there, we're just no better at preventing them
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- Mugwump
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
- Location: Between London and Melbourne
^ I knew of the Leonski case, and there was another serial killing spree of girls as children in 1936. There are relatively few stranger murders of women, historically, though of course the Victorian population was substantially smaller then.
I had in mind the Vukotic case, the Meagher case and the Dixon case, all within the last three years. You may be right that these can be attributed to more young women walking alone at night, but the frequency is striking.
Domestic violence rates are historically impossible to compare, I think, given the nature of the crime and its setting, reportability etc.
I had in mind the Vukotic case, the Meagher case and the Dixon case, all within the last three years. You may be right that these can be attributed to more young women walking alone at night, but the frequency is striking.
Domestic violence rates are historically impossible to compare, I think, given the nature of the crime and its setting, reportability etc.
Two more flags before I die!
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54842
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 132 times
- Been liked: 167 times
^
Also factor in alcohol and reasons to be out in the evening.
Back in those days, pubs shut at 6pm. Shops closed at 5pm. Going out to eat at a restaurant wasn't common place, there was little reason to be out after 6pm.
People also didn't walk or jog for exercise back then, they did it for transportation.
Basically, if the number of people inclined to do these kind of acts hasn't increased, the number of potential targets has. Significantly.
I see tonight in the news, a young woman has reported being sexually assaulted during a night out, but can't recall much of the detail as she'd been drinking. https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 4zmwe.html
Also factor in alcohol and reasons to be out in the evening.
Back in those days, pubs shut at 6pm. Shops closed at 5pm. Going out to eat at a restaurant wasn't common place, there was little reason to be out after 6pm.
People also didn't walk or jog for exercise back then, they did it for transportation.
Basically, if the number of people inclined to do these kind of acts hasn't increased, the number of potential targets has. Significantly.
I see tonight in the news, a young woman has reported being sexually assaulted during a night out, but can't recall much of the detail as she'd been drinking. https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 4zmwe.html
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- Mugwump
- Posts: 8787
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
- Location: Between London and Melbourne
Yes, no doubt that all plays a role. As does the decline of patrol-based policing, increasing urban anonymity, the availability of cars to criminals, the widespread use of mind-altering drugs and other things besides.stui magpie wrote:^
Also factor in alcohol and reasons to be out in the evening.
Back in those days, pubs shut at 6pm. Shops closed at 5pm. Going out to eat at a restaurant wasn't common place, there was little reason to be out after 6pm.
People also didn't walk or jog for exercise back then, they did it for transportation.
Basically, if the number of people inclined to do these kind of acts hasn't increased, the number of potential targets has. Significantly.
I see tonight in the news, a young woman has reported being sexually assaulted during a night out, but can't recall much of the detail as she'd been drinking. https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 4zmwe.html
We can speculate on a hundred possible factors, which is partly why I think that prevention strategies are a bit needle-in-a-haystack and unlikely to work.
Given that we cannot unwind the disintegration of our society, I think the only reasonable remedy is to stop releasing people who have a history of violence towards women, and to mete out stern justice to the perpetrators.
Two more flags before I die!
- thesoretoothsayer
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:15 am
- Been liked: 23 times
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969807/
Swedish study but I'm assuming the results are pretty generic.
Here's the deal. If we exterminate 1% of the (mostly male) population we get rid of 63% of violent crime. Do we do it?
Swedish study but I'm assuming the results are pretty generic.
Here's the deal. If we exterminate 1% of the (mostly male) population we get rid of 63% of violent crime. Do we do it?
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Agreed. Correct weight.think positive wrote:i dont, i dont give a shit about titles such as feminism, its as helpful as racist terms.thesoretoothsayer wrote:Two daughters: 18 and 13.
They don't conflate feminism and women. Why do you?
you trivialized sexual assault. you certainly cant compare it to locking your car door or getting swooped by magpies.
if you leave your front door unlocked and you get robbed, the robber is in the wrong, but your stupid, ditto stolen cars, if you have sons too, i hope you've taught them respect for others,
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Thwy got the perpetrator of the graffitti:
No year 12 muck up kid.
31 year old male.
https://www.theage.com.au/melbourne-new ... 4zobs.html
No year 12 muck up kid.
31 year old male.
https://www.theage.com.au/melbourne-new ... 4zobs.html
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- Nick - Pie Man
- Posts: 7194
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:53 pm
- Been liked: 1 time
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
Why introduce an irrelevant comparison to this awful act rahter than adress the act itself? By way of doing so, you intentionally or unintentionally try to make allowance for the pretty f*cked behaviour.swoop42 wrote:While it might have been highly inappropriate, spray painting on a piece of grass in a public park still appears less offensive to me than those who would choose to graffiti a permanent war memorial or an individuals headstone in a cemetery.
It is sadly, another act of another pathetic male.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman