What made you happy today?

Nick's current affairs & general discussion about anything that's not sport.
Voice your opinion on stories of interest to all at Nick's.

Moderator: bbmods

Locked
User avatar
luvdids
Posts: 3963
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:56 am
Location: work

Post by luvdids »

K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

stui magpie wrote:
K wrote:...
I think domesticated cats are really evil, and had thought that the wild variety did not have that evil element. Is that wrong?

Part of the problem with domesticated cats is their owners, who seem to think it's fine for them to slaughter hundreds of thousands of birds a year (for example).
The animals aren't evil, they just aren't humans and have none of our emotions, morals and hangups.
...
Domestic cats are relatively intelligent and seem to get pleasure from what humans would regard as wanton acts of cruelty and killing. Should we excuse them from the label "evil"?
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54850
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 169 times

Post by stui magpie »

K wrote:
stui magpie wrote:
K wrote:...
I think domesticated cats are really evil, and had thought that the wild variety did not have that evil element. Is that wrong?

Part of the problem with domesticated cats is their owners, who seem to think it's fine for them to slaughter hundreds of thousands of birds a year (for example).
The animals aren't evil, they just aren't humans and have none of our emotions, morals and hangups.
...
Domestic cats are relatively intelligent and seem to get pleasure from what humans would regard as wanton acts of cruelty and killing. Should we excuse them from the label "evil"?
I don't particularly like cats, but yes we should.

They aren't human, they're cats. Do they have fun tormenting an injured bird or mouse? Yes. They have just as much fun doing the same with a toy one.

They have no concept of cruel, or right and wrong for that matter. When people anthromorphise animals and ascribe human emotions and behaviours to them, they're way over complicating something that's just animal behaviour.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

^^^
If cats have no conscience and hence moral responsibility, despite being relatively intelligent, should we then hold their owners morally responsible for acts we consider evil?
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54850
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 169 times

Post by stui magpie »

^

Depends on the act. It's not the owners fault that the cat kills thing, that's their nature. It's the owners fault that the cat is outside and therefore able to kill things.

Feral cats are a massive problem. Can't blame their owners though. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/australia-s ... -day-study

https://www.smh.com.au/environment/cons ... 4zn9p.html
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
luvdids
Posts: 3963
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:56 am
Location: work

Post by luvdids »

K wrote:^^^
If cats have no conscience and hence moral responsibility, despite being relatively intelligent, should we then hold their owners morally responsible for acts we consider evil?
Geez, let it go, domestic cat behaviour has nothing to do with wild lions killing poachers.

However, not ALL domestic cat owners let their pets roam around killing animals. Dogs also kill animals you know, often other pets. And yes, their owners are held responsible. Are the acts considered "evil"? Really? As Stui said, it's in the animals nature, ergo, natural. Just like a lion eating a wildebeest's balls.
K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

^ That's actually what annoys me: dogs are held to a vastly higher standard, an almost impossible-to-meet standard, while cats are allowed to get away with just about anything. The things they put dogs down for... if they applied the same standards to cats, there would hardly be any cats left. As I said previously, it's the domestic cats I've always found despicable, not the wild ones. There are whole bird species being wiped out because cat-owners think it's cruel to keep their cats indoors or to wear collars with bells. How sad.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54850
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 169 times

Post by stui magpie »

^

I'm a dog person, but a large dog is quite capable of severely injuring or even killing a human. That's what they get put down for. The largest domestic cat, can't. They're environmental vandals and I personally wouldn't shed a tear if all of them, domestic and feral, were wiped out in Australia, but an animal that's just acting on it's instincts isn't evil.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

K wrote:
Wokko wrote:Just picked this up :D
<pic>
The man or the car?
Haha! Missed this one. I'm the man in the picture :lol:
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40243
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by think positive »

You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54850
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 169 times

Post by stui magpie »

Last edited by stui magpie on Sat Jul 07, 2018 8:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

All?
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

, t

Post by Mugwump »

Two more flags before I die!
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54850
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 169 times

Post by stui magpie »

^

Killing a lion was always a status symbol, going back to Zulu tribesmen and when lions were plentiful, because they are an apex predator.

Nowdays, with canned hunting and modern rifles, shooting a lion is just an exercise in penis enlargement by wealthy phucktards who have no concept of real hunting.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
Mugwump
Posts: 8787
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Between London and Melbourne

Post by Mugwump »

Two more flags before I die!
Locked