Pies4shaw wrote:Probably not with that kid on that day, though. I don't think it's seriously suggested that he had murderous intent but only had an egg to hand, is it? I assume he wanted to humiliate the "eggee" and make him an object of ridicule but not actually hurt him.
Thanks TP for holding the line.
No, no one is suggesting that this kid had any other intent other than to humiliate the eggee, make a political statement and get attention for himself, hence why he was filming it on his own camera.
If he had of thrown the egg from a few feet away, I'd have far less a problem with it, but coming up behind someone, in this case a public figure, and striking them to the back of the head (even with an egg) is not behaviour that should condoned let alone celebrated. If someone did it to Penny Wong or even Bill Shorten I doubt very much he'd be nominated for Australian of the year, it's only because Anning is an obnoxious weed.
If the behaviour goes unpunished (even a small fine and no conviction would suffice) it sets a bad precedent and the next time it might not be so tame. If someone can get up behind a public figure with an egg, why not a knife, a kosh, a syringe etc.
Anyway, it's only a faulty pixel in the big picture which isn't really about Anning or Egg boi.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.