#35,#1 Jaidyn Stephenson
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:39 pm
I am SO disappointed in some of you.
A young man, 20 years old, did the wrong thing. No financial or sinister implications.
Who hasn’t?
He’s copped a fair old whack and i just know our beautiful club will be around him to stop this spiralling into something dark.
Get on board, instead of flaming the poor kid.
The club has enough reinforcements to take care of the on-field stuff.
A young man, 20 years old, did the wrong thing. No financial or sinister implications.
Who hasn’t?
He’s copped a fair old whack and i just know our beautiful club will be around him to stop this spiralling into something dark.
Get on board, instead of flaming the poor kid.
The club has enough reinforcements to take care of the on-field stuff.
- PyreneesPie
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has liked: 66 times
- Bruce Gonsalves
- Posts: 848
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:17 pm
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 8 times
Poor Jaydo isn't the sharpest tool in the tool shed and he is going to take a massive hit financially. I noticed he won the MOTY nomination for round 12.
Got me thinking, what's involved in pushing his votes up, like Tom Gleeson did with last years Gold Logie, and getting Jaydo up for the end of year prize?
Could it be done?
Got me thinking, what's involved in pushing his votes up, like Tom Gleeson did with last years Gold Logie, and getting Jaydo up for the end of year prize?
Could it be done?
- PyreneesPie
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has liked: 66 times
- tbaker
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:51 am
- Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
Well, not exactly Jezza...there's no doubt he received a discount because of his self-reporting, but the AFL also said that they arrived at the 10 week suspension in consideration of several factors. From the AFL website report:Jezza wrote:The fact that he self-reported means he only misses 10 matches (half a season) compared to a whole season.stoliboy wrote:Punishment is too harsh.
Where is the incentive for other AFL players in the future to self report and come forward... you’re going to lose half the season.
If he didn't self report and the AFL became aware of his activities, he wouldn't have received a reduction in his punishment today.
"Dillon said the fact Stephenson self-reported, along with his age, cooperation in the investigation, remorse and previous cases saw them arrive at the 10-game ban"
I believe this whack will indeed discourage others (and it'd be naive to think there aren't others) from coming forward, especially if they are older players or who have bet on more occasions than Jaidyn did. They'll just go with the 0 week ban option for as long as they can, knowing that self-reporting may now just end their career.
I also believe that if this had been announced 10 games into the season, it'd be a 12 match ban, if it was 14 games in, it'd be an 8 week ban - in other words, the effective sentence just nicely fits the remaining duration of the h&a (and no doubt the club would've helped engineer this outcome, with the threat of legal challenges etc. if the AFL dared go any harder).
I find your lack of faith disturbing
-
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Former England and Manchester United midfielder Paul Scholes has been fined £8,000 after admitting breaking Football Association betting rules.
Scholes was charged after it was alleged that he placed 140 bets on football matches between 17 August 2015 and 12 January 2019.
The FA also warned him as to his future conduct.
"I would like to apologise and I understand and fully accept the fine imposed by the FA," said Scholes.
"It was a genuine mistake and was not done with any deliberate intention to flout the rules.
"I wrongly believed that as long as there was no personal connection between me and any of the matches that I bet upon, then there would be no issue.
Scholes was charged after it was alleged that he placed 140 bets on football matches between 17 August 2015 and 12 January 2019.
The FA also warned him as to his future conduct.
"I would like to apologise and I understand and fully accept the fine imposed by the FA," said Scholes.
"It was a genuine mistake and was not done with any deliberate intention to flout the rules.
"I wrongly believed that as long as there was no personal connection between me and any of the matches that I bet upon, then there would be no issue.
- Rd10.1998_11.1#36
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
- Location: Sevilla, Spain
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 5 times
...and that’s why the relationship would continue, with or without sponsorshipeddiesmith wrote:The betting companies are also happy to help out as they don’t want results fixed that costs them money
It would be great to bring some public pressure on the AFL- and the remaining clubs who still have pokies - to ‘quit’ gambling
- WhyPhilWhy?
- Posts: 9547
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: Location: Location:
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 37 times
Don't bet in the sport you play in is a fairly universal rule - it was plain dumb to do so.
Lucky for him he didn't bet on himself to kick 4 goals and then be found to miss shots after kicking those 4.
But also, don't buy shares in your company based on inside information, don't prescribe for your own family if you're a doctor, don't provide evidence against your own clients if you're a lawyer - all dumb moves.
Lucky for him he didn't bet on himself to kick 4 goals and then be found to miss shots after kicking those 4.
But also, don't buy shares in your company based on inside information, don't prescribe for your own family if you're a doctor, don't provide evidence against your own clients if you're a lawyer - all dumb moves.
- colin_wood
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 11:41 am
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
- Dark Beanie
- Posts: 4859
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 12:41 pm
- Location: A galaxy far, far away.
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 27 times
- WhyPhilWhy?
- Posts: 9547
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: Location: Location:
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 37 times
- LaurieHolden
- Posts: 3842
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:04 am
- Location: Victoria Park
- Has liked: 202 times
- Been liked: 185 times
How many times have we now read statements about he should have known better...e.g. Jordan Lewis taking the moral high ground, I thought that was over the top.
It is clear that players receive education briefings. A 10 year + player would have had countless briefings over his career, with that your obligations as a player sink in even more.
Good on Howe for steering a young man in the right direction, he should receive a Club / broader commendation for that. Just think for a moment if he let it slide and it became a bigger issue.
Think for a moment, a second year player, at 20 y/o. , but his feet probably haven't touched the ground since he walked through the doors.
The gravity of the issue clearly slipped through him and no doubt other players in the AFL.
I don't have an issue re the outcome of the investigation and resultant suspension. The integrity of our game is sacrosanct.
And it is not about Collingwood.
If we should point the finger, start with the AFL, a contradiction in allowing and taking betting sponsorship in one hand and at the same time ignoring the social impact.
Time the AFL take a stand and leave a legacy. They've had a terrible year, rules interpretation and handling of the crowd behaviour as examples.
I'll say it again, time to re-shape the AFL board, too many silvertails and not enough community grounded appointments.
It is clear that players receive education briefings. A 10 year + player would have had countless briefings over his career, with that your obligations as a player sink in even more.
Good on Howe for steering a young man in the right direction, he should receive a Club / broader commendation for that. Just think for a moment if he let it slide and it became a bigger issue.
Think for a moment, a second year player, at 20 y/o. , but his feet probably haven't touched the ground since he walked through the doors.
The gravity of the issue clearly slipped through him and no doubt other players in the AFL.
I don't have an issue re the outcome of the investigation and resultant suspension. The integrity of our game is sacrosanct.
And it is not about Collingwood.
If we should point the finger, start with the AFL, a contradiction in allowing and taking betting sponsorship in one hand and at the same time ignoring the social impact.
Time the AFL take a stand and leave a legacy. They've had a terrible year, rules interpretation and handling of the crowd behaviour as examples.
I'll say it again, time to re-shape the AFL board, too many silvertails and not enough community grounded appointments.
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
2023 AFL Premiers
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
I liked Titus O'Reilys recent tweets:
The AFL is furious with Jaidyn Stephenson for placing a bet.
“We make money off gambling, not the players”
and
"Jaidyn Stephenson has been handed a 22-match ban (12 matches suspended) and fined $20,000. I'm disappointed as I'd backed him to get seven weeks through the AFL's official wagering partner."
Nathan Buckley wow, just wow. That interview on SEN is compelling listening.
The AFL is furious with Jaidyn Stephenson for placing a bet.
“We make money off gambling, not the players”
and
"Jaidyn Stephenson has been handed a 22-match ban (12 matches suspended) and fined $20,000. I'm disappointed as I'd backed him to get seven weeks through the AFL's official wagering partner."
Nathan Buckley wow, just wow. That interview on SEN is compelling listening.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman