Essendon copping it

Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29544
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 350 times

Post by Jezza »

Think Geelong will beat them comfortably.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19938
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 447 times
Been liked: 222 times

Post by Presti35 »

We were supposed to beat them comfortably.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

^We don't do things easily. And then when we do things the hard way, Nicksters claim our oppo "would have beaten any other team", "were playing their GF", etc. This despite e.g. WB losing 4 games in a row including our game, WC being smashed before (not immediately before) and after playing us, etc.
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

I think everyone will beat them comfortably (except, maybe, Carlton). They’re 1 and 3 since Daniher came back. I bet they’re glad they “managed” him for the Swans’ game.
K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

It's like every team we play loses multiple games before and after playing us, but Nicksters still insist "they would have beaten any other team", "they are premiership favourites" (no, we are), etc. There's no need for panic at all, but why do Nicksters have to believe things that are clearly not true to feel happy about how we're going?
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

I don't know. I am perfectly sanguine about where we are at. We are 8 players short of a team of AFL-standard players. Still, we are mostly winning, so it's mostly fun.
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40243
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by think positive »

Presti35 wrote:To be fair, Essendon have done a good job to turn it around from their round 1 embarrassment Vs GWS and their shock loss to the Saints in round 2.

I guess it goes to show you cant judge too harshly too early on.

In saying that their wins have come against Melbourne, Brisbane and the Kangaroos. Two of those teams occupy the bottom 2.

I honestly feel that Collingwood should have put them away. We were all over them and didnt put it on the scoreboard. Were we the better side? We we just lucky? I think our own mistakes and lack of converting goals kept them in it.

So we'll see how they respond and if they can make the 8.

Here's their next 4:
Vs Cats (MCG)
Vs Swans (SCG)
Vs Freo (Marvel)
Vs Rich (MCG)

We play them again in round 23, and you never know, we might see them again not long after that.

Personally, I hope they go back to their round 1 form.
Whatever it takes!!!

May they rot til the last doper is gone
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

Pies4shaw wrote:I don't know. I am perfectly sanguine about where we are at. We are 8 players short of a team of AFL-standard players. Still, we are mostly winning, so it's mostly fun.
8? You're a hard marker, p4s.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Greenwood, Mihocek, Mayne, Roughead, Thomas, Wills, Reid. That's 7. It becomes 8 when Beams comes back in - I know he replaces one of the seven but he's so bad he counts as 2. :wink:
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

Fair enough. Probably not a lot to argue with there.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19938
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 447 times
Been liked: 222 times

Post by Presti35 »

Unbelievable that a team that has been beaten by 72, 58, 59 and 104 points during the season is in the 8
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29544
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 350 times

Post by Jezza »

We're living through a weak era of football, which started in 2016.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19938
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 447 times
Been liked: 222 times

Post by Presti35 »

I know Essendon have had an extremely bad run with the injuries, but they dont deserve to play finals.

Scrapping past the Suns, North and a few others in recent weeks has given them enough wins to be in for now.

I think Freo and Collingwood will be able to take care of them and they'll miss out.

Lord have mercy if they knock us off.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Essendon's form at the moment is special - apart from the bottom 4 teams, they are the only side in the AFL to have lost the last two games.
Post Reply