think positive wrote:The most important part that services have been massively cut for mental health, and he is right.
And I agree, but his explanation for why is totally wrong. Welfare cheats have very little to do with it. It’s all about how and where governments choose to allocate spending and how much of a revenue pool they have access to. There have been a lot of bad deliberate political choices along the line that have gotten us to this point.
Wokko wrote:As for refugees, it's again not that they receive "More", it's that they receive it immediately and stay on welfare after being granted asylum. They also never go back, so we have another sector of generational welfare and the latest arrivals add extremely violent crimes like car jackings and home invasions to those costs, crimes that were pretty much unheard of 20 years ago.
On the contrary, burglary rates have been steadily declining in Australia:
https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi495
While the rate of carjacking remains quite rare, with little indication as to whether it’s on the increase or decrease.
https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi351
Ultimately, the best way to prevent this kind of crime is through better social spending on infrastructure, welfare, support mechanisms etc. So it’s all circular in the end. If you keep people poor, you reap the rewards of higher crime rates, cycles of unemployment, increased healthcare costs, and so on. We’re spending too much on fixing the symptoms and not enough on preventing the illness. In that sense, poverty costs taxpayers big time.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange