Decent enough write up.
#2 Jordan De Goey
Moderator: bbmods
Sorry mate but I'm not assuming and understand innocent until proven BUT my point was that another 3 incidents have occurred since then.Mr Miyagi wrote:Beamer09 you’re assuming JDG is guilty! We don’t even know what the incident was, and there’s another bloke charged too. This could be like the Beams rape saga, where he did nothing wrong but his name was dragged through the mud because he was there at the party and he’s at a famous club and it got attention to get the culprit who did do it, otherwise it probably would have gone nowhere and the guilty individual never charged.
COLLINGW09D
-
think positive
- Posts: 40194
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 230 times
- Been liked: 88 times
what three incidents are you referring to?BEAMER09 wrote:OK, JDG was 18/19 or thereabouts when this occurred. Young and coming into the AFL system BUT yet he has managed a further 3 incidents since that time if I'm correct...culture?PyreneesPie wrote:This is a fairly pertinent point doris!!! Just because he's been charged doesn't mean he is guilty or will be convicted. See the case of Majak Daw!!!!doriswilgus wrote:Anyway,we should all remember that a person is innocent until proven guilty,and that should apply in this case as well.
Also, this has very little to do with Collingwood culture. JDG must have been 18 or 19 when this happened and so he would've just only entered the system. So, there is no way that one year at any club could over -ride the influences of the previous 18 or 19 in governing a young person's behaviour at that point in life.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
-
Hiss
- Posts: 4821
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:28 pm
- Location: Geelong
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 3 times
- Contact:
Disgraceful
It disgusts decent people that our putrid sex obsessed media report that people are charged with serious offences even though the law presumes them innocent until otherwise proven to the contrary. Unfortunately most dumb people simply assume someone charged must be guilty . Furthermore innocent people can spend a very long time in jail and have their lives ruined awaiting for an ultimate innocent verdict. A footballer can suffer life changing mental health issues and career ending form while a matter proceeds through the Courts. We are seeing too many historical charges being thrown out which begs a question about the Government and its servants. Of course we cannot comment on any specific cases. I make reference to the matters being already dealt with. We should support our players and always say a prayer for them in their difficult times.
I love this club and I hold anyone in contempt who does not think it is worth fighting for.
-
stui magpie
- Posts: 54667
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 78 times
3 sex related incidents or are you referring to the drink driving and dog ate my finger incidents?BEAMER09 wrote:Sorry mate but I'm not assuming and understand innocent until proven BUT my point was that another 3 incidents have occurred since then.Mr Miyagi wrote:Beamer09 you’re assuming JDG is guilty! We don’t even know what the incident was, and there’s another bloke charged too. This could be like the Beams rape saga, where he did nothing wrong but his name was dragged through the mud because he was there at the party and he’s at a famous club and it got attention to get the culprit who did do it, otherwise it probably would have gone nowhere and the guilty individual never charged.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
-
Piesnchess
- Posts: 26167
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 189 times
- Been liked: 76 times
Adz wrote:Unsubstantiated smearing. It wasn’t too long ago everyone was quick to condemn Geoffrey Rush and John Jarrett. How’d they turn out ?
My thoughts exactly, and the Jarrett one went back FORTY BLOODY YEARS, how the hell can somenone wait that long, then come out with totally unsubstanciated claims, ?? there should be a statute of limitations on this stuf, its getting way out of control now, seems to be the new in thing.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
-
shawthing
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
- Location: Victoria Park
- Has liked: 5 times
- Been liked: 79 times
I said on Friday night there;s a culture problem at Collingwood. This has happened far too often under Eddie and Buck's watch. Time the board asked both for their resignations I think.BEAMER09 wrote:Under Bucks since 2012 in cotton wool lead by Eddie with player misdemeanors by Thomas & L Keefe, Jordan DeGoey x 3, Sam Murray, Jaidyn Stephenson, Brayden Sier, Steele S, L. Dunn and Eddie x many (lost count). And now we have this from JDG and he continued to eff up in the coming years, the pending situation with Heritier, and Eddie again prior to Steele covid-19 where he said players should be fined $100k and suspended for the year so why didn't he do that to Steele?stui magpie wrote:Why?BEAMER09 wrote:TIME for Ed and Bucks to RESIGN...pathetic
The allegation goes back to 2015, it was investigated by Vic Police and the AFL in 2018 (which is hardly covering things up) and now clearly something new had come to light and the Police have decided to press charges.
What's pathetic?
(When Steele get's into trouble - something is not right at this club!!!)
That is an impressive record for an AFL club that is not matched by any other club.
Have been saying for a few years now it's Collingwood Culture - why are we surprised as nothing changes under this leadership.
If not pathetic, what would you call it? unlucky?, bad luck? they hate us?, they are after us? we sell papers?, good for TV ratings? what...?
The only good thing is that they haven't blamed Collingwood for covid-19!!!
1. Dogthink positive wrote:what three incidents are you referring to?BEAMER09 wrote:OK, JDG was 18/19 or thereabouts when this occurred. Young and coming into the AFL system BUT yet he has managed a further 3 incidents since that time if I'm correct...culture?PyreneesPie wrote: This is a fairly pertinent point doris!!! Just because he's been charged doesn't mean he is guilty or will be convicted. See the case of Majak Daw!!!!
Also, this has very little to do with Collingwood culture. JDG must have been 18 or 19 when this happened and so he would've just only entered the system. So, there is no way that one year at any club could over -ride the influences of the previous 18 or 19 in governing a young person's behaviour at that point in life.
2. 0.095
3. Driving while license susp / mobile use
COLLINGW09D
-
billy_picken25
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:58 am
- Location: Boronia, Victoria
Statute of limitations , not applicable
Piesnchess wrote:Adz wrote:Unsubstantiated smearing. It wasn’t too long ago everyone was quick to condemn Geoffrey Rush and John Jarrett. How’d they turn out ?
My thoughts exactly, and the Jarrett one went back FORTY BLOODY YEARS, how the hell can somenone wait that long, then come out with totally unsubstanciated claims, ?? there should be a statute of limitations on this stuf, its getting way out of control now, seems to be the new in thing.
Innocent until proven guilty, he seems to have a history of poor decision making.
I hope you have heard of the "The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse was a royal commission established in 2013 by the Australian government pursuant to the Royal Commissions Act 1902 to inquire into and report upon responses by institutions to instances and allegations of child sexual abuse in Australia." There is no statute of limitations, seems the allegation been in process for a couple of years.
"Go Pies"
-
PyreneesPie
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has liked: 66 times
